| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A murine model of asthma is described in which we examined the role of intercellular adhesion molecule-1
(ICAM-1) in the pathogenesis of airway reactivity, pulmonary eosinophilia, and inflammation. We sensitized wild-type control [C57BL/6J, (+/+)] and ICAM-1 knockout [C57BL/6J-ICAM-1, (
/
)] mice to
ovalbumin (OVA), and challenged them with OVA delivered by aerosol (OVA-OVA) to induce a phenotype consistent with an asthmatic response. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and counts of cell
numbers and measurements of eosinophil content and cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
(BALF) were significantly attenuated in ICAM-1
/
mice as compared with (+/+) mice. We also showed
that the absence of ICAM-1 had no significant affects on the production of serum IgE antibody, but did
have an effect on ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation. Additionally, immunohistochemistry: (1) revealed increased staining for vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) after antigen challenge in the ICAM-1
/
mice but not in the ICAM-1+/+ controls; and (2) confirmed the presence of alternatively spliced forms of
ICAM-1 in the lungs of ICAM-1
/
mice. Thus, despite the availability of alternate adhesion pathways in
ICAM-1
/
mice, the absence of ICAM-1 prevented eosinophils from entering the airways. In summary,
we found that the ICAM-1 knockout mice exhibited a significantly inhibited response to aerosol antigen challenge for most of the parameters examined, and conclude that ICAM-1 is an important ligand mediating T-cell proliferation in response to antigen, eosinophil migration into the airways, and the development
of airway hyperreactivity (AHR) in allergen-sensitized and -challenged mice.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary inflammation characterized by airway eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) are hallmarks of asthma (1). Asthma is also known to be accompanied by an increase in allergen-specific and total IgE, with a cytokine profile in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) that is representative of a Th2-mediated event (2). Several animal models, including the guinea pig, rat, and nonhuman primates, show symptomatic phenotypes similar to that of atopic asthma upon aerosol antigen challenge (3). Recently, mouse models have been shown to reproduce many features of human asthma (7). Moreover, the availability of specific sensitizing protocols for eliciting a Th2-mediated inflammatory process, specific immunologic modifying reagents, systems for measuring pulmonary function, and the availability of genetically engineered animals make murine models of asthma appealing.
In most models, inhaled antigen in sensitized animals initiates a cascade of proinflammatory events and is known to cause an increase in cell-adhesion-molecule expression on both the endothelial surface of the lung vasculature and the epithelial surfaces of the airways (12, 13). The net result is an inflammatory-cell migration into the lung, characterized by an acute neutrophil influx followed by a chronic airway eosinophilia. Both in vitro and in vivo data suggest that the recruited eosinophils release a host of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines that include interleukin (IL)-5, major basic protein (MBP), eosinophilic cation protein (ECP), and eosinophil peroxidase (14). In this regard, upregulation and function of various adhesion molecules are necessary for the diapedesis and migration of leukocytes from the vasculature and into the airways. Eosinophils and neutrophils express both leukocyte integrin (MAC-1) and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), and may therefore migrate via these ligands through intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expressed on the endothelium and pulmonary epithelium (17). The other major pathway, involving very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), has also been described in mediating antigen-induced airway eosinophilia and hyperreactivity in guinea pigs (18) and Brown Norway (BN) rats (19). Expression of VLA-4 is limited to eosinophils and lymphocytes, which may bind VCAM-1 or fibronectin for trafficking to inflammatory sites (12, 20).
The use of genetically altered mice as models of the proinflammatory events in asthma offers a distinct advantage over treatments with monoclonal antibody, which may be complicated by: (1) drug metabolism; (2) inherent sensitization to the antibody, concurrent with the production of neutralizing antibody with chronic treatment; and (3) distribution of the antibody to tissues and targeted cell types. However, limitations in forming conclusions from gene-knockout mice should be considered. As an example, Kumasaka and colleagues have described a role for ICAM-1 in a model of endotoxin-induced lung neutrophilia (21). Antisense oligonucleotides and monoclonal antibodies to ICAM-1 provided inhibition of the lung neutrophilia, whereas the ICAM-1 gene knockout was comparable to the wild type. Given these results, Kumasaka and colleagues have postulated that the upregulation of alternative pathways in the absence of ICAM-1, or additional effects of these agents on endothelium, may account for these disparate results.
Although previous studies have shown the importance of ICAM-1 in the development of airway inflammation and hyperreactivity, the relative contribution of ICAM-1 during sensitization to allergen in these models remains unclear. In our experiments, we sought to further define the role of ICAM-1 in a mouse model of asthma by assessing the integrated effects of antigen recognition, T-cell sensitization, and the subsequent development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and recruitment of eosinophils into the airways of both wild-type mice and mice genetically deficient for the ICAM-1 glycoprotein. Our data provide direct evidence for an important cellular and functional role of ICAM-1 in the induction of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Male wild-type C57BL/6J (ICAM-1+/+) and ICAM-1-deficient C57BL/6J-ICAM-1 < tm1BAY > (ICAM-1
/
) mice
weighing 23 to 25 g were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). They were housed at 10 animals
per cage, allowed food and water ad libitum, and kept under a 12-h light-dark cycle. All experiments were performed according to the directions of the Animal Care and
Use Committee at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Ridgefield, CT, with an approved protocol.
Sensitization and Antigen Challenge
To achieve an immune response mediated by IgE (10), mice were sensitized with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 ml of aluminum hydroxide (Amphogel; Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA) (2 mg/ml) adsorbed to ovalbumin (OVA) (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp., La Jolla, CA) (16 µg/ml) in sterile Ca2+- and Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco BRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). The mice were subsequently boosted, intraperitoneally, with this same mixture 5 d later.
On Day 12 after the initial sensitization, from 8 to 10 mice were placed in a 24 × 34 × 13-cm polypropylene chamber for antigen exposure; this consisted of two exposures, in a single day for 1 h each and separated by 4 h, to an aerosol generated from 0.5% OVA in sterile PBS. This group was termed OVA/OVA. The aerosol was generated with an ultrasonic nebulizer (Devilbiss Ultra Neb 99; Devilbiss Corp., Somerset, PA); a room air bias flow of 0.5 liters/min was maintained through the chamber. Negative controls were sensitized to OVA and challenged with aerosolized PBS, and were designated as OVA/PBS. Following challenge, the mice were returned to their cages for 2 or 3 d, after which time they were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal; Abbott Laboratories, N. Chicago, IL), 70 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection, and were prepared for measurement of bronchial reactivity to methacholine (MCh) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), respectively, as subsequently described in detail.
Measurement of Lung Function
Pulmonary resistance (RL) was determined as previously described by De Sanctis and colleagues (22). Briefly, each mouse was anesthetized and its trachea was cannulated with a 19-gauge tubing adapter. The jugular vein was catheterized for the administration of methacholine (MCh) (as methacholine chloride), and a thoracotomy was performed. Following surgery, each animal was placed in a whole-body plethysmograph and ventilated with a rodent ventilator (Model 683; Harvard Apparatus, Natick, MA); a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 3 cm H2O was provided. RL was calculated by analysis of electrical signals proportional to transpulmonary pressure and lung volume. Changes in lung volume were calculated from the measured changes in plethysmograph pressure, and transpulmonary pressure was measured as the pressure difference between the pressure at the airway opening (Pao) and the pressure within the plethysmograph itself. Dose-response curves for MCh were obtained by administering sequentially increasing doses of MCh (33 µg/kg to 3,300 µg/kg) in volumes based on body weight. The peak RL response occurred in this interval and was used for the evaluation of airway reactivity. The vehicle, PBS, had no effect on RL. From the relationship between the dose of MCh administered and RL, the effective dose that would have resulted in an increase in RL was determined by log-linear interpolation. The dose required to increase the RL to 270% of baseline is termed the ED270 RL, and can be interpreted as an index of pulmonary reactivity (23); because the doses of agonist are given in geometrically increasing amounts, it is common to logarithmically transform the data. Numerically low values of ED270 RL indicate a high level of sensitivity to the administered agonist and are consistent with an asthma-like phenotype. Dose-response curves for MCh were constructed for each animal, and a mean response curve for each group was constructed from these data. From these curves, data were extracted to further describe the physiologic changes of the airways associated with antigen challenge in mice.
In Vitro Spleen-cell Proliferation
Mice were immunized with OVA and aluminum hydroxide as previoulsy described. On Day 12, the animals were killed and the extent of proliferation of splenic lymphocytes upon in vitro challenge with OVA was determined as detailed elsewhere (24). Briefly, spleen cells were isolated and suspended at a concentration of 107/ml in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 25 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. One-hundred microliters of the cell suspension, containing 106 cells, were added per well to flat-bottom microtiter wells (Corning Glassware, Corning NY). The cells were challenged with 100 µl of medium, or with serial 2-fold- diluted OVA (50 to 1.6 mg/ml) or anti-CD3 (Catalog No. 1452C11; Pharmigen, San Diego, CA) at 0.5 µg/ml as a control. The cells were then incubated for 72 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 and 95% air, and were pulsed with 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine during the final 18 h of culture. The cells were harvested on glass-fiber filters, and the extent of [3H]thymidine uptake was determined with a liquid scintillation counter.
Collection and Processing of Samples
For the collection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), separate groups of mice were anesthetized and placed in the supine position, and the trachea was cannulated with a 19-gauge catheter with a beveled tip. The animals were exsanguinated by cutting the brachial artery; for measurements of IgE, blood samples were collected in Microtainer serum separator tubes (Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ). Once bleeding had ceased, the lungs were lavaged three times with 1 ml of Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS. The initial lavage was instilled and retrieved one time, whereas the second and third lavages were each instilled twice. This procedure allowed for a greater number of lung washes with less diluent. Approximately 0.8 ml of lavage fluid was recovered from each of the lavages, for a pooled total of ~ 2.5 ml.
For the measurement of lavage total cell counts, the
samples were centrifuged at 25°C and 1,500 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at
80°C
for measurements of eosinophil peroxidase, total protein,
and IL-5. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml cold
PBS. Lavage total cell counts were made with a Coulter Counter (Model ZM; Coulter Electronics Corp., Hialeah,
FL). Smears of the BAL cells were prepared by placing
~ 50,000 cells into a cytocentrifuge (Cytospin 3; Shandon-Lipshaw, Pittsburgh, PA) at 400 rpm for 10 min. The
smears were air dried and stained with Wright-Giemsa
stain. Differential counts were based on readings of at
least 200 leukocytes.
Measurement of BALF Eosinophil Peroxidase, IL-5, Total Protein, and Serum Total and OVA-specific IgE
Eosinophil peroxidase in BALF was measured colorimetrically according to modified techniques previously described by Strath and colleagues (25). One hundred microliters of sample or of standard (porcine eosinophil peroxidase; ExOxEmis Corp., San Antonio, TX) were pipetted, in duplicate, into the wells of a 96-well plate (Cell Wells; Corning), followed by 100 µl of assay reaction mixture containing 0.05 M Tris buffer (Tris[hydroxymethyl]aminomethane, Trizma; Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO), 0.1 µl 30% H2O2 (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and 0.015% Triton X (Sigma Chemicals), pH = 8.0. The plate was incubated in the dark for 30 min, and the reaction was then terminated with 50 µl of 4 M H2SO4 per well, after which the samples and standards were read on a plate reader (Spectramax Model 340; Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA) at 490 nm. Regression analysis was done with the SOFTmax Pro analysis software package. The lavage IL-5 concentration was determined colorimetrically with a specific mouse IL-5 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (TiterZyme; PerSeptive Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA). The detection limit of the IL-5 assay was > 1 pg/ml, with no cross reactivity with other cytokines.
For the measurement of serum total and OVA-specific IgE, blood was collected in Microtainer serum separator tubes, clotted, and centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 20 min at 25°C. Serum total IgE and OVA-specific IgE were measured with an ELISA, using previously described protocols (26). Antibody titers for OVA-specific IgE were calculated with mouse serum standards, and were reported as ELISA units of optical density as compared with serum standards, as previously described (26). The lower limit of detection for total IgE was ~ 100 pg/ml. Whole blood was collected into ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)- coated Microtainer tubes and analyzed for total white blood cell (WBC) count and differential count, using a Technicon H1E Blood Analyzer (Bayer Corp., Tarrytown, NY).
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
For conventional histology of the lung, separate groups of
animals were sensitized and challenged under the same
protocol as previously described. The trachea was cannulated in each mouse. For light microscopy, the lungs were
gravity-inflated in situ to 25 cm H2O with 10% buffered
formalin (Fisher Scientific). The whole lung was embedded in paraffin, sectioned tangentially at a thickness of 5 µ,
and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The inflammatory infiltrate and ultrastructure of the lungs in each group of animials were evaluated in a blind fashion
by an independent histopathologist. For immunohistochemical staining, the lung tissues were inflated with 50% ornithine carbamyltransferase (OCT)/PBS in situ, embedded
in OCT (Tissue-Tek, Miles, IN), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
70°C. Cryostat sections were fixed
in cold acetone for 10 min and air dried. Nonspecific binding of antibody was blocked with Power Block containing
casein (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA). The slides were incubated overnight with each primary antibody at room temperature, using the Sequenza Immunostaining Center
(Shandon-Lipshaw). The negative control was developed
with tissues incubated with rat IgG (BioGenex). The tissue
was quenched with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol, and immunohistochemical labeling was achieved with the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method (BioGenex). Peroxidase activity was detected with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) and counterstaining with hematoxylin.
Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunohistochemistry
The monoclonal antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were derived from hybridoma cell lines. YN1/1.7 (rat antimouse ICAM-1 [a gift from Dr. Fumio Takei]) and MK 2.7 (rat antimouse VCAM-1 [American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD]) were grown according to standard cell-culture technique, and were subsequently purified. Each antibody was tested for endotoxin with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test, and was then purified so that endotoxin levels were below 5 EU/ml.
Statistical Analysis
The results for each experiment are represented as mean ± SEM. The changes in cellular and biochemical components of the BALF were analyzed with Tukey's multiple comparison test (MCT). The serum IgE and ED270 comparisons were done with Dunnett's t test. MCh dose- response curves were analyzed through a univariate analysis, comparing each dose administered among the groups.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Development of Airway Eosinophilia and Inflammation in ICAM-1+/+ Mice
Evidence of lung inflammation in the mouse model used
in the study was demonstrated by significant changes in
both the cellular and biochemical lavage parameters in
ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA-challenged mice as compared with
ICAM-1+/+ OVA/PBS group controls. OVA challenge resulted in a significant increase in the total cell count recovered in the lavage from the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA as
compared with the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/PBS group (279 ± 66 × 104 cells/ml versus 47 ± 7 × 104 cells/ml; P
0.05)
(Figure 1). This increase in total cells was primarily due to
the influx of eosinophils, as represented by the percent
eosinophil composition in the lavage (66 ± 8% versus 0;
P
0.05) (Figure 1). Additionally, evidence of airway inflammation consistent with a Th2 response in this model
was shown by the presence of IL-5 in the lavage fluid; lavage-fluid IL-5 levels were significantly greater in the OVA/
OVA than in the OVA/PBS mice (113 ± 44 pg/ml versus
39 ± 4 pg/ml [P < 0.05], respectively) (Figure 2). The levels of eosinophil peroxidase were significantly higher in
the BALF of OVA/OVA than in that of OVA/PBS mice
(109 ± 12 pg/ml versus 28 ± 3 pg/ml; P
0.05) (Figure 2).
Furthermore, we observed changes in lavage protein consistent with an altered lung permeability in the OVA/
OVA as compared with the OVA/PBS mice (496 ± 74 mg/
dl versus 172 ± 35 mg/dl, P
0.05) (Figure 3).
|
|
|
Inhibition of Airway Eosinophilia and Inflammation
In ICAM-1-deficient (ICAM-1
/
) Mice
Mice genetically deficient in ICAM-1 showed a significant
reduction in all of the cellular and biochemical factors
measured in the BALF. Values for lavage total cells and
percent eosinophils in the ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA mice
(37 ± 6 × 104 cells/ml and 5 ± 3% eosinophils) were significantly (P
0.05) smaller than those found in the
ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA mice (279 ± 66 × 104 cells/ml and
66 ± 8% eosinophils), and not statistically different from
the values for the OVA/PBS groups (Figure 1). Neither
the percent neutrophils nor the percent lymphocytes were
statistically different in the OVA/OVA+/+ and OVA/
OVA
/
phenotypes. Analysis of IL-5 and eosinophil peroxidase activity in BALF also demonstrated a significant
difference between the ICAM-1
/
mice and the ICAM-1+/+ controls (36 ± 4 pg/ml versus 113 ± 44 pg/ml IL-5,
and 80 ± 5 pg/ml versus 109 ± 12 pg/ml eosinophil peroxidase) (Figure 2). BALF total protein was also attenuated
(Figure 3) in the ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA as compared
with the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA mice (267 ± 44 mg/dl
versus 496 ± 74 mg/dl, respectively, P
0.05).
Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Counts in OVA/OVA
ICAM-1+/+ and ICAM-1
/
Mice
Circulating WBC counts for OVA/OVA ICAM-1
/
(n = 5) and OVA/OVA ICAM-1+/+ (n = 5) mice were evaluated 3 d after antigen challenge. No differences between
the ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+ mice were observed in the
total leukocyte count (8.5 ± 0.8 × 106/ml versus 6.7 ± 0.8 × 106/ml), percent eosinophils (6.5 ± 1.5 versus 5.0 ± 2.4),
percent neutrophils (13.0 ± 3.0 versus 18.2 ± 4.7), or percent monocytes (71.9 ± 3.0 versus 69.2 ± 3.3), respectively.
Induction of OVA-specific Immunity in
ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+ Mice
Active sensitization induced a significant (P < 0.05) increase in both total and OVA-specific IgE in both the
ICAM-1+/+ and ICAM-1
/
animals as compared with unsensitized animals both prior to and 3 d after OVA challenge (Table 1). There were no significant differences observed in the wild type (+/+) versus the ICAM-1-deficient (
/
) mice for serum total or OVA-specific IgE either before or after OVA challenge.
|
To determine whether the reduction in airway inflammation observed in OVA-challenged ICAM-1
/
mice
was associated with inefficient priming of OVA-specific T cells, the extent of in vitro splenocyte proliferation following OVA challenge in ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+ animals was evaluated. Splenocytes from ICAM-1
/
mice
proliferated poorly in response to in vitro OVA challenge when analyzed after 3 d of culture (Figure 4). In contrast,
strong in vitro proliferation in response to OVA was observed with splenocytes isolated from OVA-immunized,
ICAM-1-sufficient mice.
|
Development of AHR in ICAM-1+/+ Mice
Previous studies have indicated a significant change in airway reactivity to MCh in mice following antigen challenge. In the model used in the present study, antigen challenge resulted in a significant increase in airway reactivity in the wild-type mice treated with OVA/OVA as compared with mice treated with OVA/PBS. When dose-response curves for the groups were compared, we found significant (P < 0.05) differences in the peak response to MCh at the 100, 330, 1,000, and 3,300 µg/kg doses. OVA-challenged animals also achieved a higher plateau in the MCh dose- response curve (Figure 5). Log ED270 RL comparisons between the two groups could not be made, since several of the ICAM-1+/+ mice in the OVA/PBS group did not achieve these increases from baseline RL.
|
Inhibition of AHR in ICAM-1
/
Mice
To determine the role of ICAM-1 in the induction of
AHR, we generated MCh dose-response curves 2 d after
antigen challenge in both ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+
mice. The ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA mice did not show a
significant change in airway reactivity as compared with
either ICAM-1+/+ OVA/PBS or ICAM-1
/
OVA/PBS
mice; however, there was a significant increase in their log
ED270 RL when compared with that of ICAM+/+ OVA/
OVA mice (2.65 ± 0.08 versus 2.36 ± 0.07, respectively). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the maximal response to MCh at doses of 100, 330, 1,000 and 3,300 µg/kg in the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA over that of the
ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA mice.
Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation
Examination of the lung 72 h after antigen challenge
showed pathologic differences between the ICAM-1-deficient and wild-type mice. These were characterized by a
large perivascular eosinophil infiltration, airway eosinophilia, and septal-wall and airway-lumen edema in the sensitized ICAM-1+/+ mice challenged with OVA. In contrast, the lungs of sensitized ICAM-1
/
mice challenged
with OVA showed a markedly attenuated inflammatory infiltrate into the perivascular regions and minimal margination to the alveolar spaces (Figure 6). Neither ICAM+/+
OVA/PBS nor ICAM-1
/
OVA/PBS mice showed any
significant histopathologic changes.
|
Immunohistochemistry revealed staining for ICAM-1
in the lungs at both 24 and 72 h after OVA challenge in all
of the groups tested. This feature of the ICAM-1
/
transgenic mouse is consistent with the findings by King and colleagues of novel isoforms of ICAM-1 generated in
this mouse (27). Staining for VCAM-1 was detected in
both of the OVA/OVA-treated groups 1 d after antigen
challenge. More interesting was that the lungs from the
ICAM-1
/
mice treated with OVA/OVA stained positively for VCAM-1, whereas there was no apparent increased staining for VCAM-1 in the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/
OVA mice or either of the PBS-challenged groups at 3 d
after antigen challenge (Figure 7).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The findings in our study demonstrate an important role
for the common isoform of ICAM-1 in the pathogenesis of
AHR and inflammation in a murine model of allergic
asthma. In murine models, airway eosinophilia and inflammation occur as soon as 24 h after antigen challenge, and
may be resolved by Day 14 (10). We have shown that the
response in C57BL/6J mice is accompanied by a significant increase in serum IgE, and by increases in BALF eosinophil peroxidase activity, IL-5, and total protein. In addition, we found a significant increase in airway responsiveness to intravenous MCh in the sensitized and challenged
ICAM-1+/+ mice as compared with the ICAM-1
/
group.
This asthma-like response is specific to allergen challenge, because mice challenged with PBS developed no pathobiologic changes.
Following antigen challenge, sensitized wild-type mice
exhibited significantly greater bronchial reactivity to intravenous MCh than did the ICAM-1-deficient mice. These
changes included changes in the log MCh ED270 RL. Reporting only this value would suggest a shift in the entire
dose-response curve for the ICAM-1
/
group, but this
was not entirely the case. In fact, the response of all animals was similar in magnitude at the lower doses of MCh,
and significant differences between the groups were not
apparent until RL increased by more than 200% from its
baseline value. The most remarkable changes associated
with antigen challenge in the wild-type mice were the significantly greater responses at the higher end of the dose-
response curve. The sensitized and PBS-challenged animals and the sensitized and OVA-challenged ICAM-1
knockout mice achieved a plateau, whereas the wild-type antigen-challenged mice responded in a manner consistent
with severe bronchoconstriction. This analysis of the individual- and combined-group dose-response curves provided valuable information supporting an important role
for ICAM-1 in the pathogenesis of airway dysfunction.
The increase in slope and change in the plateau response
are important components of the human asthma phenotype (28), and indicate that the inflammatory response
that we induced recapitulates critical features of human
asthma.
We also examined the role of ICAM-1 in the induction
of humoral and cellular immune responses to OVA. We
measured serum total and OVA-specific IgE levels in order to determine whether ICAM-1 disruption prevented
the T-cell-dependent sensitization of B cells. Analysis indicated no difference between the and ICAM-1+/+ and
ICAM-1
/
mice in their ability to synthesize IgE, suggesting that the sensitization and associated antigen-processing events were independent of ICAM-1. In addition, we
observed that after immunization with OVA, spleen cells
from ICAM-1
/
mice proliferated poorly in response to
OVA challenge when compared with spleen cells from
ICAM-1-sufficient mice (Figure 4). Thus, it appears that
one contributing factor to the lack of airway inflammation
in ICAM-1
/
mice may be inefficient priming of OVA-specific T-cells. Whether a more vigorous immunization
protocol will sufficiently override this deficit remains to be
determined. It is interesting to note that our observations
made in this model of allergic AHR differ from the observed effects of ICAM-1 gene disruption on the induction and development of immunoinflammatory disease in a
model of collagen-induced arthritis. Bullard and colleagues
(29) showed that arthritis-prone DBA/1 mice homozygous
for the ICAM-1 mutation mounted normal cellular and
humoral immune responses to type II collagen, but did not develop arthritis. It is possible that the genetic background of the mouse strain used in the aforementioned study contributed to the experimental results. Alternatively, the data
of Bullard and colleagues and our current findings suggest
that the target organ and specific immune process may also
dictate the relative dependency on ICAM-1 of the induction and perpetuation of disease.
Several groups have previously reported a significant
role for the ICAM-1 cell-adhesion pathway in animal
models of asthma (5, 17, 34). These studies utilized monoclonal antibodies against either ICAM-1 or the ligands
LFA-1/MAC-1, and showed efficacy in limiting both airway eosinophilia and AHR. The present study supports
the earlier findings but extends them in a more comprehensive model. Mice homozygous for a disrupted ICAM-1
gene do not develop the antigen-induced and eosinophil-mediated airway inflammation that has been recognized as
one of the hallmarks of asthma. We demonstrated inhibition of airway eosinophilia and of lavage IL-5 and eosinophil peroxidase production in the lungs of ICAM-1
/
mice. IL-5 is an important cytokine in human asthma, is
produced by Th2 cells, and is known to stimulate eosinophil maturation, activation, and survival (30). Elevated
levels of eosinophil peroxidase in the lavage fluid of the
ICAM-1+/+ mice, which were attenuated in the ICAM-1
/
mice, most likely reflected the changes in activation state
of the eosinophils in the two groups. The increased presence of these mediators in the lavage fluid of the ICAM-1+/+
but not that of the ICAM-1
/
group is consistent with the
diminished accumulation of eosinophils in the airways of
OVA-challenged mice. Furthermore, the increased lavage-fluid protein in the wild-type ICAM+/+ but not the
mutant ICAM
/
mice may indicate the development of
endothelial-cell injury.
The cell-adhesion pathways for the migration of inflammatory leukocytes in the sensitized and OVA-challenged
ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+ mice were examined with immunohistochemistry. Staining for ICAM-1 was positive in
the lungs of both the ICAM-1
/
and ICAM-1+/+ mice at
3 d after challenge. This feature of the ICAM-1
/
transgenic mouse is consistent with the findings of King and coworkers of the presence of novel isoforms of ICAM-1 generated in this mouse (27). In their study, alternatively
spliced forms of ICAM-1, with an incomplete extracellular
domain structure relative to the common isoform of
ICAM-1, were detected with both reverse transcription-
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry in both wild-type and ICAM-1
/
mutant mice.
Despite the ability of these novel isoforms of ICAM-1 to
bind LFA-1 and antibodies to ICAM-1, there is no evidence of a role of these ligands in the pathogenesis of inflammatory or immune responses in vivo. In fact, evidence
provided by ICAM-1
/
mouse models of arthritis (29)
and of systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by
glomerulonephritis and vasculitis (33) and resembling lupus
erythematosus in humans implicates the common ICAM-1
isoform as essential to the pathogenesis of disease, and extends our findings.
Staining for VCAM-1 revealed increased VCAM-1 in
the ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA mice but not in the ICAM-1+/+
OVA/OVA or PBS-treated animals 3 d after antigen challenge. It is interesting that despite the persistence of
VCAM-1 expression in ICAM-1
/
mice, eosinophils were
not recovered in the BALF at 3 d after airway antigen
challenge. Both OVA-challenged groups of mice in our
study exhibited positive staining for VCAM-1 at 1 d after OVA challenge. These data suggest the persistent availability of VCAM-1-mediated cell-adhesion pathways in
the absence of ICAM-1 in the ICAM-1
/
OVA/OVA animals as compared with the ICAM-1+/+ OVA/OVA mice,
in which staining for VCAM-1 was seen only immediately after challenge. Inflammatory cells may predominantly
utilize ICAM-1 in the latter stages after antigen challenge,
and absence of this adhesion molecule prevents eosinophil
migration in the lung.
In conclusion, our data show that ICAM-1 is critical to the development of antigen-induced AHR, inflammation, and T-cell sensitization to allergen in mice, and provide further support for a role of ICAM-1 in human asthma. These data also support the general concept that pharmacologic inhibition or antagonism of cell-adhesion pathways may alter the progression and pathophysiology not only of asthma, but also of other inflammatory diseases including arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and autoimmune disease.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA; intercellular adhesion molecule-1, ICAM-1; ovalbumin, OVA; phosphate-buffered saline, PBS; vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, VCAM-1.
(Received in original form June 12, 1997 and in revised form September 30, 1997).
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge the technical expertise provided by Danbury Hospital Pathology Laboratory, Danbury, Connecticut, for processing the lung-tissue samples. The analysis of lung resistance was done with software provided by Dr. Andrew Jackson of the Biomedical Engineering Department at Boston University, and all statistical analysis was done by Mr. Tapon Roy at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. The authors wish to especially thank the biotechnology group at Boehringer Ingelheim for generating and purifying the monoclonal antibodies. Drs. De Sanctis and Gelfand are supported by grants HL36110 and HL36577, respectively, from the National Institutes of Health, and by the American Lung Association.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Bradley, B. L., M. Azzawi, M. Jacobson, B. Assoufi, J. V. Collins, A. M. Irani, L. B. Schwartz, S. R. Durham, P. K. Jeffery, and A. B. Kay. 1991. Eosinophils, T-lymphocytes, mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in bronchial biopsy specimens from atopic subjects with asthma: comparison with biopsy specimens from atopic subjects without asthma and normal control subjects and relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 88: 661-674 [Medline].
2.
Drazen, J. M.,
J. P. Arm, and
K. F. Austen.
1996.
Sorting out the cytokines
of asthma [comment].
J. Exp. Med.
183:
1-5
3. Lilly, C. M., R. W. Chapman, S. J. Sehring, P. J. Mauser, R. W. Egan, and J. M. Drazen. 1996. Effects of interleukin-5 induced pulmonary eosinophilia on airway reactivity in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol. 270(Pt. 1): L368-L375.
4. Haczku, A., K. F. Chung, J. Sun, P. J. Barnes, A. B. Kay, and R. Moqbel. 1995. Airway hyperresponsiveness, elevation of serum-specific IgE and activation of T cells following allergen exposure in sensitized Brown-Norway rats. Immunology 85: 598-603 [Medline].
5.
Wegner, C. D.,
R. H. Gundel,
P. Reilly,
N. Haynes,
L. G. Letts, and
R. Rothlein.
1990.
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in the pathogenesis of asthma.
Science
247:
456-459
6. Waserman, S., L. J. Xu, R. Olivenstein, P. M. Renzi, and J. G. Martin. 1995. Association between late allergic bronchoconstriction in the rat and allergen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151(Pt. 1):470-474.
7. Holt, P. G., A. H. Rose, J. E. Batty, and K. J. Turner. 1981. Induction of adjuvant-independent IgE responses in inbred mice: primary, secondary, and persistent IgE responses to ovalbumin and ovomucoid. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 65: 42-50 [Medline].
8.
Gavett, S. H.,
D. J. O'Hearn,
X. Li,
S. K. Huang,
F. D. Finkelman, and
M. Wills-Karp.
1995.
Interleukin 12 inhibits antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation, and Th2 cytokine expression in mice.
J. Exp.
Med.
182:
1527-1536
9.
Foster, P. S.,
S. P. Hogan,
A. J. Ramsay,
K. I. Matthaei, and
I. G. Young.
1996.
Interleukin 5 deficiency abolishes eosinophilia, airways hyperreactivity, and lung damage in a mouse asthma model [see comments].
J. Exp.
Med.
183:
195-201
10. Kung, T. T., H. Jones, G. K. Adams 3rd, S. P. Umland, W. Kreutner, R. W. Egan, R. W. Chapman, and A. S. Watnick. 1994. Characterization of a murine model of allergic pulmonary inflammation. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 105: 83-90 [Medline].
11.
Corry, D. B.,
H. G. Folkesson,
M. L. Warnock,
D. J. Erle,
M. A. Matthay,
J. P. Wiener-Kronish, and
R. M. Locksley.
1996.
Interleukin-4, but not interleukin-5 or eosinophils, is required in a murine model of acute airway
hyperreactivity [see comments].
J. Exp. Med.
183:
109-117
12.
Wegner, C. D.,
R. H. Gundel,
R. Rothlein, and
L. G. Letts.
1992.
Expression and probable roles of cell adhesion molecules in lung inflammation.
Chest
101(Suppl.):
345-395
13. Uyama, O., D. Ihaku, O. Kitada, M. Miyasaka, and M. Sugita. 1995. Role of eosinophils and cell adhesion molecules in the allergen-induced asthmatic response of rats. Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol. 90: 3-15 [Medline].
14. Rochester, C. L., S. J. Ackerman, T. Zheng, J. A. Rankin, and J. A. Elias. 1995. Major basic protein regulation of lung fibroblast cytokine production: role of cytokine synergy and charge. Chest 107(Suppl):117S-118S.
15. Seminano, M. C., and G. J. Gleich. 1994. The role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6: 860-864 [Medline].
16. Wardlaw, A. J., S. Dunnette, G. J. Gleich, J. V. Collins, and A. B. Kay. 1988. Eosinophils and mast cells in bronchoalveolar lavage in subjects with mild asthma: relationship to bronchial hyperreactivity. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 137: 62-69 .
17. Rabb, H. A., R. Olivenstein, T. B. Issekutz, P. M. Renzi, and J. G. Martin. 1994. The role of the leukocyte adhesion molecules VLA-4, LFA-1, and Mac-1 in allergic airway responses in the rat. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149: 1186-1191 [Abstract].
18. Milne, A. A., and P. J. Piper. 1995. Role of the VLA-4 integrins in leukocyte recruitment and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the guinea-pig. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 282: 243-249 [Medline].
19. Laberge, S., H. Rabb, T. B. Issekutz, and J. G. Martin. 1995. Role of VLA-4 and LFA-1 in allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and lung inflammation in the rat. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151(Pt. 1):822-829.
20. Springer, T. A.. 1990. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346: 425-434 [Medline].
21. Kumasaka, T., W. M. Quinlan, N. A. Doyle, T. P. Condon, J. Sligh, F. Takei, and Beaudet Al, C. F. Bennett, and C. M. Doerschuk. 1996. Role of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in endotoxin-induced pneumonia evaluated using ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotides, anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibodies, and ICAM-1 mutant mice. J. Immunol. 97: 2362-2369 .
22. De Sanctis, G. T., M. Merchant, D. R. Beier, R. D. Dredge, J. K. Grobholz, T. R. Martin, E. S. Lander, and J. M. Drazen. 1995. Quantitative locus analysis of airway hyperresponsiveness in A/J and C57BL/6J mice. Nature Genet. 11: 150-154 [Medline].
23. Eum, S. Y., C. Zuany-Amorim, J. Lefort, M. Pretolani, and B. B. Vargaftig. 1997. Inhibition by the immunosuppressive agent FK-506 of antigen- induced airways eosinophilia and bronchial hyperreactivity in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 120: 130-136 [Medline].
24.
Nabozny, G. H.,
J. M. Baisch,
S. Cheng,
D. Cosgrove,
M. M. Griffiths,
H. S. Luthra, and
C. S. David.
1996.
HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice are highly susceptible to collagen-induced arthritis: a novel model for human polyarthritis.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
27-37
25. Strath, M., D. J. Warren, and C. J. Sanderson. 1985. Detection of eosinophils using an eosinophil peroxidase assay: its use as an assay for eosinophil differentiation factors. J. Immunol. Methods 83: 209-215 [Medline].
26. Oshiba, A., B. Hamelmann, K. Takeda, K. L. Bradley, J. E. Loader, G. L. Larsen, and B. W. Gelfand. 1996. Passive transfer of immediate hypersensitivity and airway hyperresponsiveness by allergen-specific immunoglobulin IgE and IgG1 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 1398-1408 [Medline].
27. King, P. D., E. T. Sandberg, A. Selvakumar, P. Fang, A. L. Beaudet, and B. Dupont. 1995. Novel isoforms of murine intercellular adhesion molecule-1 generated by alternative RNA splicing. J. Immunol. 154: 6080-6093 [Abstract].
28. Macklem, P. T.. 1989. Mechanical factors determining maximum bronchoconstriction. Eur. Respir. J. 6(Suppl.): 516S-519S .
29. Bullard, D. C., L. A. Hurley, I. Lorenzo, L. M. Sly, A. L. Beaudet, and N. D. Staite. 1996. Reduced susceptibility to collagen-induced arthritis in mice deficient for intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J. Immunol. 157: 3153-3158 [Abstract].
30.
Yamaguchi, Y.,
T. Suda,
J. Suda,
M. Eguchi,
Y. Miura,
N. Harada,
A. Tominaga, and
K. Takatsu.
1988.
Purified interleukin-5 supports the terminal
differentiation and proliferation of murine eosinophilic precursors.
J. Exp.
Med.
167:
43-56
31.
Sanderson, C. J..
1992.
Interleukin-5, eosinophils, and disease.
Blood
79:
3101-3109
32. Warren, D. J., and M. A. Moore. 1988. Synergism among interleukin 1, interleukin 3, and interleukin 5 in the production of eosinophils from primitive hemopoietic stem cells. J. Immunol. 140: 94-99 [Abstract].
33. Bullard, D. C., P. D. King, M. J. Hicks, B. Dupont, A. L. Beaudet, and K. B. Elkon. 1997. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 deficiency protects MRL/ MpJ~Faslpr mice from early lethality. J. Immunol. 159: 2058-2067 [Abstract].
34. Nagase, T., Y. Fukuchi, T. Matsuse, B. Sudo, H. Matsui, and H. Orimo. 1995. Antagonism of ICAM-1 attenuates airway and tissue responses to antigen in sensitized rats. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151: 1244-1249 [Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Matsubara, C. H. Swasey, J. E. Loader, A. Dakhama, A. Joetham, H. Ohnishi, A. Balhorn, N. Miyahara, K. Takeda, and E. W. Gelfand Estrogen Determines Sex Differences in Airway Responsiveness after Allergen Exposure Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2008; 38(5): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Terawaki, T. Yokomizo, T. Nagase, A. Toda, M. Taniguchi, K. Hashizume, T. Yagi, and T. Shimizu Absence of Leukotriene B4 Receptor 1 Confers Resistance to Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Th2-Type Immune Responses J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4217 - 4225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Kumar and P. S. Foster Modeling Allergic Asthma in Mice: Pitfalls and Opportunities Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., September 1, 2002; 27(3): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Vicentini, P. Mazzi, E. Caveggion, S. Continolo, L. Fumagalli, J. A. Lapinet-Vera, C. A. Lowell, and G. Berton Fgr Deficiency Results in Defective Eosinophil Recruitment to the Lung During Allergic Airway Inflammation J. Immunol., June 15, 2002; 168(12): 6446 - 6454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Chapoval, K. Iijima, E. V. Marietta, M. K. Smart, A. I. Chapoval, A. G. Andrews, and C. S. David Allergic Inflammatory Response to Short Ragweed Allergenic Extract in HLA-DQ Transgenic Mice Lacking CD4 Gene J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 890 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lorenz, M. Jones, C. Wohlford-Lenane, N. Meyer, K. L. Frees, N. C. Arbour, and D. A. Schwartz Genes other than TLR4 are involved in the response to inhaled LPS Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): L1106 - L1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Borchers, J. Crosby, P. Justice, S. Farmer, E. Hines, J. J. Lee, and N. A. Lee Intrinsic AHR in IL-5 transgenic mice is dependent on CD4+ cells and CD49d-mediated signaling Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): L653 - L659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takeda, A. Haczku, J. J. Lee, C. G. Irvin, and E. W. Gelfand Strain dependence of airway hyperresponsiveness reflects differences in eosinophil localization in the lung Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): L394 - L402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. MacLean, G. T. De Sanctis, K. G. Ackerman, J. M. Drazen, A. Sauty, E. DeHaan, F. H. Y. Green, I. F. Charo, and A. D. Luster CC Chemokine Receptor-2 Is Not Essential for the Development of Antigen-Induced Pulmonary Eosinophilia and Airway Hyperresponsiveness J. Immunol., December 1, 2000; 165(11): 6568 - 6575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. LARSEN and P. G. HOLT The Concept of Airway Inflammation Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2000; 162(2): S2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Trifilieff, Y. Fujitani, F. Mentz, B. Dugas, M. Fuentes, and C. Bertrand Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitors Suppress Airway Inflammation in Mice Through Down-Regulation of Chemokine Expression J. Immunol., August 1, 2000; 165(3): 1526 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Matsuse, A. K. Behera, M. Kumar, H. Rabb, R. F. Lockey, and S. S. Mohapatra Recurrent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in Allergen-Sensitized Mice Lead to Persistent Airway Inflammation and Hyperresponsiveness J. Immunol., June 15, 2000; 164(12): 6583 - 6592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Grunstein, H. Hakonarson, N. Maskeri, C. Kim, and S. Chuang Intrinsic ICAM-1/LFA-1 activation mediates altered responsiveness of atopic asthmatic airway smooth muscle Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): L1154 - L1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Schramm, L. Puddington, C. A. Yiamouyiannis, E. G. Lingenheld, H. E. Whiteley, W. W. Wolyniec, T. C. Noonan, and R. S. Thrall Proinflammatory Roles of T-Cell Receptor (TCR)gamma delta and TCRalpha beta Lymphocytes in a Murine Model of Asthma Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, |