|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitric oxide (NO) acts as an endogenous mediator in mature skeletal muscle. In this study, we investigated the regulation of the endothelial (eNOS) and neuronal (nNOS) isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in skeletal-muscle development (rat diaphragm). Muscle NOS activity, nNOS and eNOS protein, and mRNA expressions were markedly increased during the late gestational and early postnatal periods. Expression of both isoforms, however, declined progressively thereafter. Similarly, argininosuccinate lyase and argininosuccinate synthetase, both involved in the recycling of L-citrulline to L-arginine, were expressed at high levels in rat embryonic and neonatal diaphragms, with gradual reduction in their expression during late postnatal development. Immunostaining revealed extensive nNOS expression at the sarcolemma in neonatal and mature diaphragms, whereas eNOS expression was limited to the endothelium. Both neonatal and adult diaphragms expressed an alternatively spliced nNOS isoform with an insert of 34 amino acids between exons 16 and 17. In vitro-generated muscle force rose significantly after NOS inhibition in both neonatal and adult diaphragms, but the magnitude of force augmentation was larger in adult than in neonatal diaphragm. These results indicate that constitutive NOS isoforms are developmentally regulated in skeletal muscles, suggesting multiple roles for NO in developing and mature skeletal-muscle fibers.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO is synthesized by three isoforms of NOS. Two of these NOS isoforms are constitutively expressed in various cells, and were first identified in brain cells (neuronal NOS; nNOS) and endothelial cells (eNOS) (1). A third isoform, inducible NOS (iNOS), has been identified in inflammatory cells and smooth muscles in response to cytokines and bacterial endotoxin (2).
nNOS has recently been identified in skeletal-muscle fibers, and occurs beneath the sarcolemma of fast-twitch fibers (3). The association of nNOS with the sarcolemma is mediated through the interaction of nNOS with the dystrophin complex (6). Disruption of the dystrophin complex in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies results in downregulation of nNOS expression (7, 8), as well as displacement of nNOS from the sarcolemma to the cytoplasm (6). In addition to being enriched in the sarcolemma, nNOS expression is also enriched at the muscular endplate (9). Recent experiments indicate that skeletal-muscle nNOS is an alternatively spliced form that is expressed in brain cells (10). Muscle fibers are also reported to express eNOS, which has a cytoplasmic distribution and is localized mainly in muscle fibers rich in succinate dehydrogenase (11).
A new role for NO was recently discovered in cell differentiation and development. Inhibition of NO release in Drosophila larvae resulted in hypertrophy of organs (12). This finding, along with the transient expression of nNOS in the brain, spinal cord, and alveolar epithelial cells in mammalian embryos, is supportive of NO involvement in cell differentiation (13, 14). Lee and colleagues (15) provided first evidence of NO involvement in the fusion of chick embryo myoblasts under in vivo and in vitro conditions. Apart from these data, little is known about the regulation of various NOS isoforms during the development of mammalian skeletal muscles. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NO production and NOS-isoform expressions are regulated in fetal, neonatal, and mature mammalian muscle fibers. We also investigated the changes in the expression of argininosuccinate synthetase (AS) and argininosuccinate lyase (AL) in the developing skeletal muscle. These two enzymes are essential for the recycling of L-citrulline to L-arginine. Additionally, we compared the structure of nNOS mRNA expressed during early muscle development with that found in adult muscle fibers. We focused on the diaphragm because it is an important ventilatory muscle and because it has been well characterized during prenatal and postnatal development.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents
Materials for the L-citrulline assay were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). L-[2,3-3H]arginine was obtained from Dupont Inc. (Mississauga, ON). Western blotting apparatus and gels were obtained from Novex Inc. (San Diego, CA). Monoclonal anti-nNOS and anti-eNOS antibodies were obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Polyclonal anti-nNOS antibody was raised against homogenous nNOS protein purified from rat cerebellum (13). The enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit was purchased from Amersham Canada (Oakville, ON). The 100-bp DNA marker used in the study was obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD).
Animal Preparation
The procedures used in the study were approved by the
Animal Care Committee of McGill University. Pathogen-free, time-dated, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats at the
gestational age of 18 to 21 d were obtained from Charles
River Laboratories (St.-Constants, QC). Six pregnant rats
were killed (gestational age: 18 d, embryonic Day 18) and
diaphragms from their fetuses were quickly dissected and
frozen in liquid nitrogen. Diaphragms from littermate fetuses were pooled. An additional eight pregnant rats were
allowed to deliver, and their neonatal offspring of both
sexes were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium and
decapitated at 1, 7, and 30 d after delivery (postnatal Days
1, 7, and 30). The fetuses' diaphragms were harvested as
described earlier. Diaphragms were also obtained from
adult male rats (> 115 d). For immunostaining, the diaphragms were sandwiched between liver slices and were
flash frozen in cold isopentane (20 s), and then immersed
in liquid nitrogen and stored at
80°C.
Diaphragm-strip Preparation
The diaphragms of adult and 7-d-old rats were surgically excised with ribs and central tendon attached, and were placed in an equilibrated (95% O2/5% CO2, pH 7.38) Krebs solution chilled to 4°C that had the following composition (mM): 118.0 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 1 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 0.025 d-tubocurarine, and 11.0 glucose. From the central tendon to the rib, a muscle strip (3 to 4 mm wide) was dissected free from the lateral costal portion of the diaphragm. The rib was left attached to the strip and was used to secure the diaphragm strip in the custom built Plexiglas muscle chamber. The strip was mounted in the muscle chamber and the muscle chamber was mounted vertically in a double-jacket gut bath (Kent Scientific Instruments). A No. 4.0 silk thread was used to secure the central tendon to the isometric-force transducer (Kent Scientific Instruments, Litchfield, CT).
Muscle strips were stimulated electrically at constant currents via platinum electrodes mounted in the muscle chamber, which were connected to a square-wave pulse stimulator (Model S48; Grass Instruments, Warwick, RI). After an equilibration period of 30 min (temperature: 22 to 25°C), the organ-bath temperature was increased to 35°C and the maximum current necessary to elicit maximum force at a 120-Hz stimulation frequency (600-ms duration) was identified. Muscle length was then gradually adjusted with a micrometer to the optimal value (Lo) at which maximum isometric muscle force was generated in response to supramaximal stimulation (current: 300 to 350 mA, frequency: 120-Hz). Force-frequency relationships of adult and 7-d-old diaphragms were then constructed by varying the stimulation frequency (between 10 and 120 Hz) while keeping supramaximal current and stimulation duration (600 ms) constant. A second force-frequency relationship was constructed following 30 min of exposure to 1 mM S-methylisothiourea (SMT) (a selective NOS inhibitor). Tetanic contractions were digitized at a frequency of 1 KHz with a personal computer, and the results were stored on the hard disk for later analysis. At the end of the experiment, the strip was blotted dry and weighed. Muscle length (cm) and weight (g) were measured and used to calculate the cross-sectional area. Isometric forces were normalized for estimated muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) by using the value of 1.056 g/cm3 for muscle density (16). The peak force in N/cm2 was measured for each contraction within the force-frequency curve.
L-Citrulline Assay
Frozen tissues were homogenized in 6 volumes (wt/vol)
of homogenization buffer (pH 7.4, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid [HEPES]
buffer, 0.1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid [EDTA], 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride [PMSF], 0.32 mM sucrose, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin A). The crude homogenates were centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant (50 µl) was added to prewarmed
(37°C) 10-ml tubes containing 100 µl of reaction buffer of
the following composition: 50 mM KH2PO4, 60 mM valine, 1.5 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
(NADPH), 10 mM flavine adenine dinucleotide, 1.2 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA),
1 µg/ml calmodulin, 10 µM tetrahydrobiopterin, and 25 µl
of 120 µM stock L-[2,3-3H]arginine (150 to 200 cpm/pmol).
The samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C and the reaction was terminated by the addition of cold (4°C) stop
buffer (pH 5.5, 100 mM HEPES, 12 mM EDTA). To obtain free L-[3H]citrulline for the determination of enzyme
activity, 2 ml of Dowex 50w resin (8% crosslinked, Na+
form) were added to eliminate excess L-[2,3-3H]arginine.
The supernatant was assayed for L-[3H]citrulline through
liquid scintillation counting. Enzyme activity was expressed
in pmol of L-citrulline produced/min/mg total protein. Protein was measured with the Bradford technique, with BSA
as standard (Bio-Rad Inc., Hercules, CA). NOS activity
was also measured in the presence of 1.5 mM each of ethylene glycol-bis-(
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and EDTA, which replaced CaCl2 and
calmodulin in the reaction buffer, and in the presence of
1 mM of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (an
NOS inhibitor) or of 1 mM S-methylisothiourea (SMT).
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent NOS activity was calculated
as the difference between that measured in the presence of
CaCl2 and that measured in EDTA/EGTA buffer. Ca2+/
calmodulin-independent NOS activity was measured in the
presence of EGTA/EDTA.
Immunoblotting
Frozen tissues were homogenized in 6 volumes (wt/vol) of homogenization buffer, as mentioned previously. The homogenates were centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant (100 µg total protein) was heated for 15 min at 90°C and then loaded on gradient (4 to 12%) Tris-glycine-sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked overnight (4°C) with 5% nonfat dry milk, and subsequently incubated with primary monoclonal anti-eNOS (1:1,000), monoclonal anti-nNOS (1:1,000), polyclonal anti-AS (1:2,000) and polyclonal anti-AL (1:500) antibodies. NOS antibodies were raised against 20.4-kD and 22.3-kD protein fragments corresponding to human eNOS and human nNOS sequences, respectively. Our extensive preliminary experiments revealed that these antibodies are selective to their corresponding NOS isoforms in rat tissues. Lysates of human endothelial cells and human pituitary were used as positive controls. Anti-AS and anti-AL antibodies were raised in rabbits against recombinant rat proteins (17). Specific proteins were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse secondary antibody and ECL reagents (Amersham Canada, Oakville, ON). The blots were scanned with an imaging densitometer (Model GS700, 12-bit precision and 42-µm resolution; Bio-Rad Inc.), and optical densities of protein bands were quantified with SigmaGel software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). Predetermined molecular-weight standards (Novex Inc.) were used as markers.
Immunohistochemistry
Air-dried cryostat sections (10 µm) were rehydrated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4, 3 to 5 min) and then blocked for 1 h with normal donkey or horse serum. Sections were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with primary monoclonal anti-eNOS (5 µg/ml in 1% BSA) or polyclonal anti-nNOS (1:1,000 dilution) antibody. After three washings, sections were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat antirabbit or donkey antimouse secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then visualized with a Nikon fluorescence microscope and photographed with a 35 mm camera (Nikon Inc.). A similar protocol was used for negative control sections except that anti-NOS antibodies were replaced by mouse or rabbit IgG.
Reverse-Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples following
the method described by Chomczynski and Sacchi (18).
One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus
(MMLV) reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). Two
types of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed.
First, we used a relatively low concentration of RT-generated complementary DNA (cDNA) (5 ng) to quantify the
changes in mRNA for eNOS, nNOS, and
-actin (both as
an internal standard and as a positive control) during muscle development. Oligonucleotide primers (synthesized in
the McGill University DNA Synthesis Facility) for eNOS
were forward (5'-TACGGAGCAGCAAATCCAC-3') and
reverse (5'-CAGGCTGCAGTCCTTTGATC-3') primers,
which yielded an 819-bp product (19). For nNOS, we used
forward (5'-CACATTTGCATGCATGGGCTCGA-3') and
reverse (5'-CTCTGCAGCGGTATTCATTC-3') primers
that produced a 1,025-bp product. We also amplified
-actin
with forward (5'-AACCCTAAGGCCAACCGTGA-3') and reverse (5'-TCATGAGGTAGTCTGTCAGGT-3')
primers that produced a 240-bp product (20). Our preliminary experiments indicated that 5 ng of cDNA was within
the linear range of the relationship between template concentration (total RNA) and the intensity of the PCR product. Experimental conditions for all PCRs were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of
replication (94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for
1.5 min). This was followed by a final 10-min extension at
72°C. Ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gels were used
to separate PCR products, which were visualized under UV
light. The optical density of DNA bands was scanned with a
densitometer and quantified with SigmaGel software (Jandel Scientific). To verify the accuracy of the amplified sequence, PCR products were cloned in PCRII plasmid (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and sequenced in the McGill
University DNA Sequencing Facility.
Second, we used five pairs of oligonucleotides (Figure 1
and Table 1) to amplify the full coding sequence of nNOS
from diaphragmatic RNA extracted from 1-d-old neonates
and adult rats. These oligonucleotides amplified overlapping sequences. PCR experimental conditions were the
same as described previously, except that 1 µg of first-strand cDNA was used as a template. PCR products were
separated in 1.2% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE)
buffer and then transferred onto Hybond-N membranes
(Amersham Canada). Prehybridization was performed with
0.5 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1 mM EDTA
and 7% SDS at 65°C for 2 to 5 h. The full-length sequence of human nNOS (a generous gift from Dr. P. Marsden,
University of Toronto) was labeled with [
-32P]deoxycytosine triphosphate ([
-32P]dCTP), using the T7 QuickPrime
Kit (Pharmacia Biotech) for membrane hybridization
(65°C overnight). Posthybridization washing with 1× standard saline citrate (SSC) and 0.5% SDS was done at room temperature for 5 min, followed by washing with the same
buffer at 65°C for 2 h. Nonspecific hybridization was removed by high-stringency washing (0.1× SSC and 0.1%
SDS). Autoradiography was performed with Kodak Biomax
(Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) film at room temperature for 4 h.
|
|
|
Data Analysis
Results of NOS activity and diaphragmatic force are presented as means ± SEM. Differences in NOS activity and muscle force between different age groups and different stimulation frequencies were compared through two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Any differences detected were evaluated post hoc with the Student-Neuman-Keuls procedure. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diaphragmatic total NOS activity averaged 42.0 ± 5.5 pM/ min/mg protein at embryonic Day 18, and increased slightly to 44.4 ± 4.5 pmol/min/mg at postnatal Day 1 (Figure 2). NOS activity then declined progressively at postnatal Day 7, Day 30, and in adult diaphragms (Figure 2). NOS activity throughout diaphragmatic development was dependent on the presence of Ca2+ and calmodulin, with Ca2+/calmodulin-independent activity being barely detectable (Figure 2). Incubation with 1 mM of L-NAME or 1 mM of SMT completely inhibited NOS activity in all age groups. Changes in nNOS and eNOS protein expressions during diaphragmatic development are shown in Figure 3. A prominent nNOS protein band (165 kD) was detected in embryonic Day 1 diaphragm, and in several samples a smaller band (150 kD) was seen. At postnatal Day 1, nNOS protein expression rose slightly (118% of embryonic Day 18), but then declined in postnatal Day-7, Day-30, and adult muscles to about 68%, 11%, and 3%, respectively, of that measured on embryonic Day 18 (Figure 3A). By comparison, eNOS protein expression declined progressively to 51%, 20%, 18%, and 13% of its embryonic Day-18 value in postnatal Day-1, Day-7, Day-30, and adult diaphragms, respectively (Figure 3B). Modifications of nNOS and eNOS protein expression during diaphragmatic development appear to have been due to alterations in mRNA levels for these isoforms as detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR (Figure 4). Both eNOS and nNOS mRNA levels rose at postnatal Day 1 as compared with embryonic Day 18, and then declined thereafter (Figure 4).
|
|
|
Figure 5 shows the localization of nNOS protein in 7-d-old (middle) and adult (top) diaphragms. Prominent nNOS expression was evident at the extrajunctional sarcolemma (sarcolemma other than the neuromuscular junction) of both 7-d-old and adult diaphragms (Figure 5). We detected eNOS protein only in the endothelial cells of 7-d-old and adult diaphragms (not shown).
|
The changes in protein expression of AS and AL are shown in Figure 6. Both of these enzymes were highly expressed during the embryonic and early postnatal periods. The expression of both enzymes declined progressively during postnatal development, and only very weak expression was detected in adult muscle (Figure 6).
|
Figure 7 shows force-frequency relationships of in vitro-isolated strips from 7-d-old and adult diaphragm before and after inhibition of NOS with SMT. In the adult diaphragm, incubation with SMT elicited a significant increase in the isometric force generated in response to 10-, 20-, 30-, and 50-Hz stimulation. Maximum tetanic force was not influenced by NOS inhibition. Similarly, isometric force elicited by 10-, 20-, 30-, and 50-Hz stimulation rose significantly after NOS inhibition in 7-d-old diaphragm strips (Figure 7). When the rise in force after SMT incubation was normalized as a percentage of maximum tetanic force (Po), NOS inhibition had a relatively greater effect on force generated in response to high frequencies of stimulation (30 and 50 Hz) in the adult diaphragm than on that of 7-d-old diaphragm (Figure 7).
|
Figure 1 shows the structural diversity of nNOS mRNA obtained from postnatal Day-1 and adult diaphragms. Using five sets of overlapping primers that spanned the full open reading frame of rat brain nNOS, we found that identical nNOS mRNA was expressed in both diaphragms. Upon cloning and sequencing of RT-PCR products, we found that F1R1, F2R2, and F5R5 primers amplified sequences in adult and newborn rat diaphragm that were identical to that of rat-brain nNOS. On the other hand, F3R3 and F4R4 primers amplified sequences in the newborn and adult diaphragm that were 102-bp larger than rat-brain nNOS. Sequencing revealed that these extra bases represented an insert between exons 16 and 17, and coded for 34 amino acids (Figure 8), as described previously for rat skeletal muscles and cultured myotubes (10). These amino acids do not share significant sequence homology with other NOS isoforms or any other known proteins.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main findings of this study are: (1) skeletal muscle NOS activity was significantly higher in the fetal and early neonatal periods than in mature muscle; (2) increased NOS activity in the fetal and neonatal muscles was due to high expression of both eNOS and nNOS, which declined significantly for both isoforms in the adult muscle; (3) AS and AL are both expressed at relatively higher levels in embryonic and neonatal muscles than in mature muscles; (4) an identical, alternatively spliced nNOS isoform was expressed in the neonatal and mature skeletal muscles; (5) nNOS was expressed at the sarcolemma both in neonatal and adult muscles; and (6) NOS activity exerts a negative influence on isometric muscle force in both neonatal and mature muscles.
NOS Expression in Skeletal Muscle
Several investigators have confirmed the existence of nNOS in skeletal-muscle fibers (3, 4, 5, 21, 22). Moreover, a positive correlation between nNOS expression and the percentage of type II fibers has also been reported in rat muscles (4, 23). Existence of the eNOS isoform in skeletal muscle fibers is still debatable. Although Kobzik and coworkers (11) described significant eNOS staining in muscle fibers rich in succinate dehydrogenase, others were unable to detect eNOS in human muscle fibers (5). Recent studies also indicate that in skeletal-muscle fibers, nNOS interacts with syntrophin, which is part of the dystrophin complex (6, 24). The absence of dystrophin in Duchenne muscular dystrophy leads to more cytoplasmic rather than sarcolemmal localization of nNOS (6).
Evidence emerging over the past few years indicates regulation of NO production during development. In the brain, blood vessels, and lungs, both nNOS and eNOS are expressed at relatively higher levels during early and late gestational periods than in adult animals (13, 25, 26). During heart development in rats, peak eNOS expression in the endocardium and in the intima of numerous small vessels was detected at embryonic Day 18 (27). Little is known about the ontogenesis of NOS isoforms in skeletal muscles. Chao and associates (8) reported that nNOS was localized at the extrajunctional sarcolemma of postnatal Day 3 and Day 7 muscles, whereas more abundant nNOS expression was seen at the junctional sarcolemma after postnatal Day 12. Our data indicate that both the eNOS and nNOS isoforms are expressed at greater levels in fetal and neonatal muscles than in mature skeletal muscle. Roles for NO in the developing muscle remain unclear. Investigators have reported that NO may influence neuromuscular transmission (9). Additionally, endogenous NO release appears to exert a negative influence on muscle force (4). Our data confirm the inhibitory effect of endogenous NO release on muscle force generation not only in mature but also in neonatal muscle. The main mechanism through which NO inhibits muscle force is likely to be increased cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) concentration and activation of cGMP-dependent kinases. These kinases are important regulators of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In addition, NO is capable of attenuating Ca2+ influx through ryanodine receptors, inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, and regulation of creatine kinase activity (11, 28, 29).
Despite the abundance of NOS activity in the neonatal muscle, the influence of NOS inhibition on muscle force was smaller than in mature muscle. This finding, together with the localization of nNOS expression at the extrajunctional sarocelmma during development, suggests that nNOS activity in the developing muscle may mediate processes other than regulation of muscle force. One of these processes is likely to be glucose uptake (30). We also speculate that NO production in neonatal muscles may participate in myocyte differentiation. In the developing Drosophila, inhibition of NOS activity causes hypertrophy of organs, whereas ectopic expression of NOS in larvae has the opposite effect (12). These results indicate that NO acts as an antiproliferative agent during development, controlling the balance between cell proliferation and cell differentiation. An increase in NOS activity in developing lungs, blood vessels, bones, and the CNS, coinciding with the cessation of cell proliferation and the beginning of cell differentiation, tends to support this important, newly suggested role of NO (14, 25, 26, 31). Indeed, Lee and colleagues (15) showed that fusion of chick embryonic myoblasts requires the presence of NO. On the basis of these results, we propose that relatively high NO production in fetal and early neonatal muscles is necessary for myocyte differentiation, which is known to continue during the early postnatal period. The mechanisms through which NO influences muscle differentiation remain to be studied.
Our results also indicate that eNOS is regulated during muscle development in a manner similar to that reported in the developing lung and cerebral cortex (25, 26, 32). The importance of endothelial NO production in developing skeletal muscles has recently been emphasized by Pierce and coworkers, who reported a significant increase in the incidence of limb-reduction defects after prenatal inhibition of NOS in rats (33).
For its activity, NOS requires free L-arginine, which derives from a cycle in which L-citrulline is converted to L-arginine through serial catalysis by AS and AL (17). Both AS and AL are heavily expressed in liver cells, with minor expression found in various other organs (17). No information is available about the expression of these enzymes in skeletal-muscle fibers. In macrophages and smooth muscles, exposure to inflammatory cytokines elicits not only the induction of iNOS but induction of AS and AL (34, 35). Our study provides the first evidence that these two enzymes are highly expressed in embryonic and neonatal skeletal muscles. In addition, the fact that expression of AS and AL closely mimics that of constitutive NOS isoforms in developing skeletal muscles suggests that a high rate of L-citrulline turnover to L-arginine exists during skeletal-muscle development, and is designed to maintain a continuous supply of L-arginine to be used as a substrate for NOS isoforms.
Structural Diversity of NOS Isoforms
Although only three genetic NOS loci have been identified, several investigators have reported tissue-specific alternative splicing of nNOS mRNA in brain tissue (36). In addition, a small (144 kD) nNOS protein has been detected in certain areas of the brain during development (31). This small nNOS protein appears to be the product of posttranslational modifications, because only one nNOS mRNA was detected. In skeletal muscles, an alternatively spliced form of nNOS mRNA, named nNOSµ, in which a 102-bp (34 amino acid) insert is located between exons 16 and 17, has been described (10). Recently, nNOSµ transcripts have been located in the penis and lower urinary tract (37). Our study confirms the existence in neonatal and adult diaphragms of a single nNOS mRNA transcript that is identical to the nNOSµ described previously in leg muscles and differentiated myoblasts in culture (10). The functional significance of this alternatively spliced nNOS mRNA species in the regulation of NO production remains to be elucidated. Our data also indicate that eNOS cDNA sequences amplified by RT-PCR are identical in neonatal and adult diaphragms, and exhibit a high identity with the human eNOS cDNA sequence.
In summary, we found significantly increased NOS activity and constitutive NOS isoform expression during late gestational and early postnatal developmental periods in the rat diaphragm. We propose that NO plays a significant role in skeletal-muscle development.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Dr. S. Hussain, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Ave. W., Room L3.05, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1 Canada. E-mail: shussain{at}rvhmed.lan.mcgill.ca
(Received in original form July 28, 1997 and in revised form October 8, 1997).
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada, Quebec Lung Association, and U.S. National Institutes of Health. S. Hussain and A. Comtois are scholars of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (Quebec). The authors are grateful to Ms. J. Long and Ms. R. Carin for secretarial support, and to Ms. L. Fang for technical expertise.
Abbreviations
AL, argininosuccinate lyase;
AS, argininosuccinate synthetase;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
EGTA, ethylene glycol-bis-(
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
NADPH, nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide phosphate;
NOS, nitric oxide synthase;
SMT, S-methylisothiourea;
SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate;
SSC, standard saline
citrate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Knowles, R. G., and S. Moncada. 1994. Nitric oxide synthases in mammals. Biochem. J. 298: 249-258 .
2. Moncada, S.. 1992. The L-arginine: nitric oxide pathway. Acta Physiol. Scand. 145: 201-227 [Medline].
3. Nakane, M., H. H. H. W. Schmidt, J. S. Pollock, U. Forstermann, and F. Murad. 1993. Cloned human brain nitric oxide synthase is highly expressed in skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 316: 175-180 [Medline].
4. Kobzik, L., M. B. Reid, D. S. Bredt, and J. S. Stamler. 1994. Nitric oxide in skeletal muscle. Nature 372: 546-548 [Medline].
5. Frandsen, U., M. Lopez-Figueroa, and Y. Hellsten. 1996. Localization of nitric oxide synthase in human skeletal muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 227: 88-93 [Medline].
6. Brenman, J. E., D. S. Chao, H. Xia, K. Aldape, and D. S. Bredt. 1995. Nitric oxide synthase complexed with dystrophin and absent from skeletal muscle sarcolemma in Duchenne muscle dystrophy. Cell 82: 743-752 [Medline].
7.
Chang, W.,
S. T. Iannaccone,
K. S. Lau,
B. S. S. Masters,
T. J. McCabe,
K. McMillan,
R. C. Padre,
M. J. Spencer,
J. G. Tidball, and
J. T. Stull.
1996.
Neuronal nitric oxide synthase and dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:
9142-9147
8.
Chao, D. S.,
J. R. M. Gorospe,
J. E. Brenman,
J. A. Rafael,
M. F. Peters,
S. C. Froehner,
E. P. Hoffman,
J. S. Chamberlain, and
D. S. Bredt.
1996.
Selective loss of sarcolemmal nitric oxide synthase in Becker muscular
dystrophy.
J. Exp. Med.
184:
609-618
9. Kusner, L. L., and H. J. Kaminski. 1996. Nitric oxide synthase is concentrated at the skeletal muscle endplate. Brain Res. 730: 238-242 [Medline].
10.
Silvagno, F.,
H. Xia, and
D. S. Bredt.
1996.
Neuronal nitric-oxide synthase-µ,
an alternatively spliced isoform expressed in differentiated skeletal muscle.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:
11204-11208
11. Kobzik, L., B. Stringer, J. L. Balligand, M. B. Reid, and J. S. Stamler. 1995. Endothelial type nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscle fibers: mitchondrial relationship. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211: 375-381 [Medline].
12. Kuzin, B., I. Roberts, N. Penuova, and G. Enikolopov. 1996. Nitric oxide regulates cell proliferation during Drosophila development. Cell 87: 639-649 [Medline].
13. Bredt, D. S., and S. H. Snyder. 1994. Transient nitric oxide synthase neurons in embryonic cerebral cortical plate, sensory ganglia, and olfactory epithelium. Neuron 13: 301-313 [Medline].
14.
Xue, C.,
P. R. Reynolds, and
R. A. Johns.
1996.
Developmental expression
of NOS isoform in fetal rat lung: implications for transitional circulation
and pulmonary angiogenesis.
Am. J. Physiol. (Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.)
270:
L88-L100
15.
Lee, K. H.,
M. Y. Baek,
K. Y. Moon,
W. K. Song,
C. H. Chung,
D. B. Ha, and
M. Kang.
1994.
Nitric oxide as a messenger molecule for myoblast fusion.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
14371-14374
16.
Close, R. I..
1972.
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscle.
Physiol. Rev.
52:
129-197
17.
Yu, Y.,
K. Terada,
A. Nagasaki,
M. Takiguchi, and
M. Mori.
1995.
Preparation of recombinant argininosuccinate synthetase and argininosuccinate
lyase: expression of the enzymes in rat tissues.
J. Biochem.
117:
952-957
18. Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi. 1987. Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162: 156-159 [Medline].
19.
Ujiie, K.,
J. Yuen,
L. Hogarth,
R. Danziger, and
R. A. Star.
1994.
Localization and regulation of endothelial NO synthase mRNA expression in rat
kidney.
Am. J. Physiol.
267:
F296-F302
20.
Shankland, S., and
J. Scholey.
1994.
Expression of transforming growth factor-
1 during diabetic renal hypertophy.
Kidney Int.
46:
430-442
[Medline].
21.
Balon, T. W., and
J. L. Nadler.
1994.
Nitric oxide release is present from incubated skeletal muscle preparations.
J. Appl. Physiol.
77:
2519-2521
22. Grozdanovic, Z., G. Nakos, G. Dahrmann, B. Mayer, and R. Gossrau. 1995. Species-independent expression of nitric oxide synthase in the sarcolemma region of visceral and somatic striated muscle fibers. Cell Tissue Res. 281: 493-499 [Medline].
23.
Hussain, S. N. A.,
M. N. Abdul-Hussain, and
D. Sakkal.
1997.
Expression of
nitric oxide synthase isoforms in normal ventilatory and limb muscles.
J.
Appl. Physiol.
83:
348-353
24.
Brenman, J. E.,
D. S. Chao,
S. H. Gee,
A. W. McGee,
S. E. Craven,
D. R. Santillano,
Z. Wu,
F. Huang,
H. Xia,
M. F. Peters,
S. C. Froehner, and
D. S. Bredt.
1996.
Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic
density protein PSD-95 and
1-syntrophin mediated by PDZ domains.
Cell
84:
757-767
[Medline].
25. Miyawaki, T., O. Sohma, M. Mizuguchi, and S. Takashima. 1995. Development of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells in the human cerebellum. Dev. Brain Res. 89: 161-166 [Medline].
26. North, A. J., R. A. Star, T. S. Brannon, K. Ujiie, L. B. Wells, C. J. Lowenstein, S. H. Snyder, and P. W. Shaul. 1996. Nitric oxide synthase type I and type III gene expression are developmentally regulated in rat lung. Am. J. Physiol. (Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.) 266: L635-L641 .
27. Ursel, P. C., and M. Mayes. 1996. Endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase in rat heart increases during development. Anat. Rec. 246: 465-472 [Medline].
28.
Gross, W. L.,
M. I. Bak,
J. S. Ingwall,
M. A. Arstall,
T. W. Smith,
J. Balligand, and
R. A. Kelly.
1996.
Nitric oxide inhibits creatine kinase and regulates rat heart contractile reserve.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:
5604-5609
29. Meszaros, L. G., I. Minarovic, and A. Zahradnikova. 1996. Inhibition of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium release channel by nitric oxide. FEBS Lett. 380: 49-52 [Medline].
30.
Balon, T. W., and
J. L. Nadler.
1997.
Evidence that nitric oxide increases
glucose transport in skeletal muscle.
J. Appl. Physiol.
82:
359-363
31. Ogilvie, P., K. Schilling, M. L. Billingsley, and H. H. H. W. Schmidt. 1995. Induction and variants of neuronal nitric oxide synthase type I during synaptogenesis. FASEB J. 9: 799-806 [Abstract].
32.
Kawai, N.,
D. B. Bloch,
G. Filippov,
D. Rabkina,
H. Suen,
P. D. Losty,
S. P. Janssens,
W. M. Zapol,
S. de la Monte, and
K. D. Bloch.
1995.
Constitutive
endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression is regulated during lung
development.
Am. J. Physiol. (Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.)
268:
L589-L595
33. Pierce, R. L., M. R. Pierce, H. Liu, P. J. Kadowitz, and M. J. S. Miller. 1995. Limb reduction defects after prenatal inhibition of nitric oxide synthase in rats. Pediatr. Res. 38: 905-911 [Medline].
34.
Nussler, A. K.,
T. R. Billiar,
Z. Z. Liu, and
S. M. Morris.
1994.
Coinduction
of nitric oxide synthase and argininosuccinate synthetase in a murine macrophage cell line.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
1257-1261
35.
Hattori, Y.,
E. B. Campbell, and
S. S. Gross.
1994.
Argininosuccinate synthetase mRNA and activity are induced by immunostimulants in vascular
smooth muscle.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
9405-9408
36. Ogura, T., T. Yokoyama, H. Fujisawa, Y. Kurashima, and H. Esumi. 1993. Structural diversity of neuronal nitric oxide synthase mRNA in the nervous system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193: 1014-1022 [Medline].
37. Magee, T., A. M. Fuentes, H. Garban, T. Rajavashisth, D. Marquez, J. A. Rodriguez, J. Rajfer, and J. F. Gonzalez-Cadavid. 1996. Cloning of a novel neuronal nitric oxide synthase expressed in penis and lower urinary tract. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 226: 145-151 [Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pisconti, S. Brunelli, M. Di Padova, C. De Palma, D. Deponti, S. Baesso, V. Sartorelli, G. Cossu, and E. Clementi Follistatin induction by nitric oxide through cyclic GMP: a tightly regulated signaling pathway that controls myoblast fusion J. Cell Biol., January 17, 2006; 172(2): 233 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. T. Hare, C. D. Mazer, W. Mak, R. M. Gorczynski, K. M. Hum, S. Y. Kim, L. Wyard, A. Barr, R. Qu, and A. J. Baker Hemodilutional anemia is associated with increased cerebral neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene expression J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2003; 94(5): 2058 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Stamler and G. Meissner Physiology of Nitric Oxide in Skeletal Muscle Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 209 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Frandsen, L. Hoffner, A. Betak, B. Saltin, J. Bangsbo, and Y. Hellsten Endurance training does not alter the level of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in human skeletal muscle J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1033 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Javeshghani, D. Sakkal, M. Mori, and S. N. A. Hussain Regulation of diaphragmatic nitric oxide synthase expression during hypobaric hypoxia Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): L520 - L527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guo, M. T. Greenwood, B. J. Petrof, and S. N. A. Hussain Expression and Regulation of Protein Inhibitor of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase in Ventilatory Muscles Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 1999; 20(2): 319 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fujii, Y. Guo, and S. N. A. Hussain Regulation of nitric oxide production in response to skeletal muscle activation J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2330 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |