Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
Volume 21, Number 5, November 1999 558-561
PERSPECTIVE
Modulation of Host-Bacterial Interactions by Collectins
Erika C.
Crouch
Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Pulmonary defenses against inhaled bacteria are complex,
overlapping, and mechanistically heterogeneous. These
include physical barriers and a diversity of biochemical
and cellular defenses. Acquired humoral and cellular immunity are of obvious importance. However, innate, nonclonal mechanisms play important roles, particularly in the
interval before the development of specific cellular immunity and in various immunodeficiency states. In the absence
of specific immunity, innate mechanisms often determine
whether bacterial inhalation is followed by immediate
clearance, colonization with asymptomatic carriage, mucosal
infection, tissue invasion, or dissemination and sepsis. In
normal hosts and in the absence of exposure to unusually
large numbers of virulent organisms, these natural front-line defenses appear sufficient to allow rapid bacterial clearance without the development of infection.
Innate pulmonary immunity includes cell-mediated mechanisms that involve the activities of the resident and recruited phagocytes. In addition, there are a wide variety of
constitutively or readily inducible proteins and peptides
with antibacterial activities in vitro that accumulate in the
lung in vivo. These substances are synthesized by epithelial
cells, which line the airways and alveoli, and resident leukocytes. Putative pulmonary host-defense molecules include:
cell wall hydrolases; notably, lysozyme
iron-binding proteins, such as lactoferrin and trans-
ferrin
complement components
defensins and cathelicidins
"matrix molecules," such as cellular fibronectin
antiproteases, such as antileukoproteinase
proteases, such as matrilysin, and
surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D).
Lung Collectins
SP-A and SP-D are structurally homologous members of
a family of collagenous, calcium-dependent lectins, which
includes serum mannose-binding lectin (MBL) (1). Human
lung collectins are synthesized by alveolar epithelial cells,
nonciliated bronchiolar cells, some epithelial cells lining
the larger airways, and glands associated with the upper
respiratory and aerodigestive tracts (1, 2). Both collectins
show specific saccharide-dependent interactions with a variety of bacterial, fungal, and viral organisms, and show
specific binding to leukocytes and/or lung epithelial cells
in vitro (1, 3).
Host Defense Roles of Collectins
In many cases, interactions of collectins with microorganisms involve specific binding of the lectin domains of the
collectin to glycoconjugates integral to the microbial cell
wall or envelope. Although the collectins often interact
with the same microbial surface structures, their specific
sites of binding may differ (e.g., SP-A binds to the lipid A
domain of a lipopolysaccharide [LPS], whereas SP-D binds
to core saccharide residues) (4). The collectins may also
interact with different surface structures on the same organism (e.g., SP-A binds to capsular polysaccharides on
specific strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, whereas SP-D
binds to LPS) (7). In addition, some interactions are mediated by the binding of microbial lectins to the collectin.
For example, influenza A and Herpes simplex viruses bind
specifically to N-linked sugars on SP-A (8). Thus, there is
a potential for cooperative, competing, or collectin-specific interactions in vivo.
On the basis of these observations, a wide variety of
potential "antibacterial" defense functions have been
suggested for lung collectins, including opsonization, microbial agglutination with effects on cellular uptake or mucociliary clearance, microbial recognition, modulation of
leukocyte activation, detoxification or presentation of endotoxin, regulation of cytokine production, phagocyte recruitment, and interference with bacterial growth or epithelial adherence (1, 2, 9, 10). A number of potentially
deleterious activities have also been suggested: competition with phagocyte lectins, inhibition or inappropriate activation of LPS-activated defenses, excessive amplification
of inflammatory reactions, enhanced internalization of organisms that are ineffectively killed, and air-space retention of a microorganism (1, 11).
At present, the most compelling evidence for pulmonary collectin-mediated, antibacterial host-defense activity comes from characterization of SP-A-null, transgenic
mice (12). Although the animals showed no discernible
abnormality in surfactant function or homeostasis (15),
host-defense defects have been observed after microbial
challenge. For example, SP-A-null mice show increased proliferation and dissemination and decreased phagocytosis
of Group B streptococci (GBS) strains, and decreased clearance of Staphylococcus aureas and Pseudomonas aeruginosa after intratracheal inoculation. In all these studies,
SP-A-null animals inoculated in the presence of purified
SP-A demonstrated a wild-type phenotype. It has not, however, been established that SP-A is functioning as an opsonin. Other mechanisms, such as modulation of macrophage mannose receptor expression, could be involved (16).
SP-D Interactions with Gram-Negative Bacteria
SP-D is known to interact with the LPS of gram-negative
bacteria, can mediate bacterial agglutination, and has been
shown to enhance the phagocytosis of gram-negative and
gram-positive bacteria by human neutrophils in vitro (4,
17). However, there are no published data that convincingly demonstrate the opsonization (i.e., increased internalization of bacteria with surface-associated SP-D) and
enhanced killing of gram-negative organisms by SP-D. In
fact, Pikaar and coworkers reported that SP-D does not
enhance the internalization of a laboratory strain of E. coli
shown to be aggregated by SP-D (18). Given these activities and the close structural homology with other collectins, we have hypothesized that SP-D contributes to antibacterial host defense or inflammatory and immune
regulation in the lung.
SP-D Interactions with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
In this issue, Restrepo and coworkers describe the interactions of rat SP-D with two strains of P. aeruginosa, one mucoid and one nonmucoid (19). They observed lectin-dependent binding of SP-D to these organisms, as well as an
approximately twofold, concentration-dependent enhancement of internalization. Under these conditions, little enhancement of internalization of a strain of Haemophilus
influenzae was observed. Opsonization experiments, in
which the organisms were preincubated with SP-D and
washed before their addition to the cells, resulted in comparable enhancement in phagocytosis. However, there was
no increase in the uptake of nonopsonized or opsonized
organisms when the macrophages were attached to SP-D-
coated slides. Internalization of the organism was accompanied by a significant decrease in colony-forming units for the mucoid, but not the nonmucoid strain, suggesting
that the nonmucoid organisms were internalized but not
killed. Interestingly, SP-D did not aggregate either strain,
despite efficient aggregation of control E. coli. Thus, the
studies provide evidence for SP-D lectin-dependent, receptor-mediated opsonization and killing of a mucoid
strain of P. aeruginosa.
Potential Clinical Implications
The previously mentioned studies are of particular interest
given the recognized importance of mucoid strains of
P. aeruginosa for the pathogenesis of chronic lung disease
associated with cystic fibrosis. Although recent studies
have focused on the possible role of altered ionic conditions on the activity of defensins and other host-defense
proteins, the possible contributions of deficient collectin
activity merits careful investigation. In this regard, the levels of SP-A and SP-D have been reported to be decreased
in the lung lavages of at least some patients with cystic fibrosis (20). Given the importance of P. aeruginosa in hospital-acquired pneumonia and sepsis, the studies could have much broader implications.
SP-D Receptors
The existence of one or more SP-D receptors on leukocytes was first suggested by studies demonstrating a potent
chemotactic activity of SP-D for neutrophils and monocytic cells (21, 22), and more recently, by SP-D-dependent
alterations in actin polymerization in alveolar macrophages (23). However, the study by Restrepo and associates is the first to implicate a SP-D receptor in bacterial phagocytosis.
The specific mechanism of cellular binding remains to
be elucidated. Calcium-dependent and calcium-independent interactions with monocyte-macrophages have been
described (24). The lectin domain of SP-D can interact in a
calcium-dependent fashion with glycoconjugates expressed
on the macrophage surface, and there is evidence that SP-D-
stimulated monocyte chemotaxis involves such a mechanism (21, 25).
The only characterized SP-D-binding protein is gp-340,
a member of the scavenger receptor superfamily, which binds
to the carboxy-terminal domain of SP-D via a calcium-
dependent mechanism (26). Although gp-340 has been immunologically localized at the surface of alveolar macrophages, it has not yet been shown to mediate SP-D
binding to these cells. Two C1q-binding proteins (C1qR
and C1qRp) known to bind to SP-A and other collectins
do not bind to SP-D (3). Specific interactions with other
SP-A receptors, including a 210-kD receptor implicated in
SP-A-mediated phagocytosis of Mycobacterium bovis (27),
have not yet been described.
Environmental Modulation of the Bacterial Phenotype
There are numerous microbial determinants of host-bacterial interactions. Determinants include not only the innoculum and route of delivery, but also the action of various virulence factors (28). Among these are adhesins that
mediate epithelial attachment. These include attachment
proteins associated with pili or flagella and integral cell-wall components, such as specific LPS or capsular polysaccharides. Bacterial pathogens may also elaborate factors required for epithelial invasion (invasins), proteases
or toxins that facilitate tissue invasion and spreading through
tissue destruction (aggressins), and factors that inhibit host
defense without significant associated tissue damage (impedins) (29).
It is increasingly appreciated that environmental conditions, in vitro or in vivo, can modify the bacterial phenotype
and expression of these molecules, thereby altering the organism's potential for adhesion, colonization, or invasion.
Bacterial phase variation, the spontaneous "on-off" of
specific bacterial genes, allows the rapid selection of variant organisms expressing virulence factors suitable for
specific biologic niches (30). In many cases, the development of lung infection in vivo involves a step-wise process
whereby organisms derived from the skin or GI tract first colonize biofilms associated with upper-airway compartments. Further adaptations and selection of alternative
phase variants may be required for colonization of the
much different and "effectively" sterile environment of
the distal airways and alveoli. Still, additional selection
events may contribute to mucosal invasion and the evasion
of host defenses. Thus, the use of only two, nonisogenic, mucoid, and nonmucoid strains is a potential limitation of
this study.
Observed differences in SP-D binding and killing of mucoid and nonmucoid strains and their corresponding heat-killed organisms are not readily explained. Are differences
attributable to the presence or absence of a capsule, or to
other differences in bacterial structure? The only established ligand for SP-D on gram-negative organisms is LPS
(1), and binding to Pseudomonas LPS has been demonstrated (31). Because abundant mucoid exopolysaccharides might mask LPS-binding sites, the efficient binding
of SP-D to the mucoid strain might suggest interactions
with the mucinous exopolysaccharides. On the other hand,
some isolates of P. aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients
have been reported to be deficient in O-polysaccharides
(32), which might favor binding of SP-D to its binding sites
to the core oligosaccharide. In any case, these studies further emphasize the potential importance of variably expressed surface structures in determining the interactions
of bacteria with host-defense molecules and cells.
Environmental Modulation of Lung Lectin Function
Environmental factors could also influence the function of
SP-D and other lung lectins. For example, Reading and
coworkers have shown that the infectivity of SP-D-sensitive strains of influenza A virus is increased in hyperglycemic, diabetic mice in vivo (33). These effects were observed at glucose concentrations that inhibited the ability
of SP-D to inhibit infectivity in vitro. Thus, inhibition of
pulmonary lectins could account for the increased risk of
diabetic patients for certain bacterial and viral respiratory
infections. Changes in the microenvironmental milieu at
sites of bacterial colonization and infection could similarly
modulate function by modifying the concentrations of various endogenous ligands, such as phosphatidylinositol or the
local accumulation of soluble, bacterial glycoconjugates.
Recently, Mariencheck and coworkers described the degradation of SP-A by a P. aeruginosa-derived protease (34).
Molecular Complexity of the Lung's
Host Defense System
The list of potential host-defense molecules is obviously
large and almost certainly incomplete. Many of the molecules listed previously are elaborated at multiple levels of
the respiratory tract, in a variety of biochemical or cellular
milieus, and probably in differing amounts at different anatomic sites. Some molecules are constitutively secreted,
whereas others are constitutively synthesized but subject
to regulated secretion. In some cases, proteins are constitutively synthesized and secreted at some sites, yet subject
to regulated secretion from glandular or surface epithelial cells. Many factors are induced or significantly amplified
in the setting of lung injury and/or after exposure to microbial products. There is also considerable overlap in the
types of host-defense molecules synthesized by parenchymal cells and resident or recruited leukocytes.
It could prove problematic to discern the relative importance of various defense proteins for different microorganisms, even using contemporary transgenic technologies. Intratracheal challenge models in transgenic animals
deficient in putative host-defense proteins can identify defects and their mechanisms, but cannot readily establish
the biologic importance of the defect. Massive inoculation
of cultured bacteria to the conducting airways will likely
bypass the processes of phase variation relevant to the more usual sequence of colonization and infection. Models
of spontaneous infection will almost certainly be needed.
Because many of the known host-defense proteins and
peptides demonstrate antibacterial activity against the same
strains of bacteria in vitro, considerable redundancy seems
likely. It is possible that the administration of sufficient
concentrations of a number of variety of antibacterial factors might "repair" host-defense defects resulting from a
deficiency of a specific host-defense protein.
Models of SP-D Deficiency
Two laboratories have recently described the development
of transgenic models of SP-D deficiency (35, 36). Although
studies examining the host-defense functions of these animals have not yet been published, the animals show striking
perturbations in surfactant homeostasis with accumulations of surfactant lipid, possible alterations in the production of surfactant proteins, abnormalities in the morphology of alveolar macrophages and type II cells, peribronchial
infiltrates of lymphocytes, and the development of emphysema. Such changes may alter the host response to inhaled organisms (e.g., through enhanced production or altered
activity of other host-defense proteins, antimicrobial effects of surfactant lipids, or prior activation of inflammatory cells) and complicate the interpretation of challenge
experiments similar to those used for SP-A.
Future Directions
Important directions for future research include a further
elucidation of microbial specificity and cellular consequences of binding and internalization, an examination of
potential interactions among antibacterial factors, a more
precise delineation of the cellular localization of specific
collectins and specific multimeric forms of these molecules, and the characterization of mechanisms of cellular
recognition of collectins.
 |
Footnotes |
Address correspondence to: Erika C. Crouch, M.D., Ph.D., Dept. of Pathology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 216 S. Kingshighway, St. Louis, MO
63110-1092.
(Received in original form September 19, 1999).
Abbreviations: lipopolysaccharide, LPS; surfactant protein, SP.
Acknowledgments:
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health
grants HL29594 and HL44015.
 |
References |
1.
Crouch, E. C..
1998.
Collectins and pulmonary host defense.
Am. J. Respir.
Cell Mol. Biol.
19:
177-201
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Wright, J. R..
1997.
Immunomodulatory functions of surfactant.
Physiol.
Rev.
77:
931-962
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Eggleton, P., and
K. B. Reid.
1999.
Lung surfactant proteins involved in innate immunity.
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
11:
28-33
[Medline].
4.
Kuan, S. F.,
K. Rust, and
E. Crouch.
1992.
Interactions of surfactant protein
D with bacterial lipopolysaccharides: surfactant protein D is an Escherichia coli-binding protein in bronchoalveolar lavage.
J. Clin. Invest.
90:
97-106
.
5.
Kalina, M.,
H. Blau,
S. Riklis, and
V. Kravtsov.
1995.
Interaction of surfactant protein A with bacterial lipopolysaccharide may affect some biological functions.
Am. J. Physiol.
268:
L144-L151
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.
Van Iwaarden, J. F.,
J. C. Pikaar,
J. Storm,
E. Brouwer,
J. Verhoef,
R. S. Oosting,
L. M. Van Golde, and
J. A. van Strijp.
1994.
Binding of surfactant
protein A to the lipid A moiety of bacterial lipopolysaccharides.
Biochem.
J.
303:
407-411
.
7.
Ofek, I., and E. Crouch. 1999. Interactions of microbial glycoconjugates
with collectins: implications for pulmonary host defense. In Glycomicrobiology. R. J. Doyle, editor. Plenum Press, London.
8.
Van Iwaarden, J. F.,
J. A. van Strijp,
H. Visser,
H. P. Haagsman,
J. Verhoef, and
L. M. Van Golde.
1992.
Binding of surfactant protein A (SP-A) to herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells is mediated by the carbohydrate
moiety of SP-A.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
25039-25043
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.
Reid, K. B. M..
1998.
Interactions of surfactant protein D with pathogens,
allergens and phagocytes.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Mol. Basis Dis.)
1408:
290-295
.
10.
van Golde, L. M. G..
1995.
Potential role of Surfactant Proteins A and D in
innate lung defense against pathogens.
Biol. Neonate
67:
2-17
.
11.
Phelps, D. S..
1995.
Pulmonary surfactant modulation of host defense function.
Appl. Cardiopul. Pathophysiol.
5:
221-229
.
12.
LeVine, A. M.,
M. D. Bruno,
K. M. Huelsman,
G. F. Ross,
J. A. Whitsett, and
T. R. Korfhagen.
1997.
Surfactant protein A-deficient mice are susceptible to group B streptococcal infection.
J. Immunol.
158:
4336-4340
[Abstract].
13.
LeVine, A. M.,
K. E. Kurak,
M. D. Bruno,
J. M. Stark,
J. A. Whitsett, and
T. R. Korfhagen.
1998.
Surfactant protein-A-deficient mice are susceptible
to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
19:
700-708
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
LeVine, A. M.,
K. E. Kurak,
J. R. Wright,
W. T. Watford,
M. D. Bruno,
G. F. Ross,
J. A. Whitsett, and
T. R. Korfhagen.
1999.
Surfactant protein-A binds group B streptococcus enhancing phagocytosis and clearance from
lungs of surfactant protein-A-deficient mice.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
20:
279-286
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Ikegami, M.,
T. R. Korfhagen,
J. A. Whitsett,
M. D. Bruno,
S. E. Wert,
K. Wada, and
A. H. Jobe.
1998.
Characteristics of surfactant from SP-A-deficient mice.
Am. J. Physiol. (Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.)
19:
L247-L254
.
16.
Chroneos, Z., and
V. L. Shepherd.
1995.
Differential regulation of the mannose and SP-A receptors on macrophages.
Am. J. Physiol.
269:
L721-L726
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Hartshorn, K. L.,
E. Crouch,
M. R. White,
M. I. Colamussi,
A. Kakkanatt,
B. Tauber,
V. Shepherd, and
K. Sastry.
1998.
Pulmonary surfactant proteins A and D enhance neutrophil uptake of bacteria.
Am. J. Physiol.
274:
L958-L969
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Pikaar, J. C.,
L. M. G. van Golde,
J. A. G. van Strijp, and
J. F. Van Iwaarden.
1995.
Opsonic activities of surfactant proteins A and D in phagocytosis of
gram-negative bacteria by alveolar macrophages.
J. Infect. Dis.
172:
481-489
[Medline].
19.
Restrepo, C. I.,
Q. Dong,
J. Savov,
W. I. Mariencheck, and
J. R. Wright.
1999.
Surfactant protein D stimulates phagocytosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by alveolar macrophages.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
21:
576-585
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Postle, A. D.,
A. Mander,
K. B. M. Reid,
J. Y. Wang,
S. M. Wright,
M. Moustaki, and
J. O. Warner.
1999.
Deficient hydrophilic lung surfactant
proteins A and D with normal surfactant phospholipid molecular species
in cystic fibrosis.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
20:
90-98
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21.
Crouch, E. C.,
A. Persson,
G. L. Griffin,
D. Chang, and
R. M. Senior.
1995.
Interactions of pulmonary surfactant protein D (SP-D) with human blood
leukocytes.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
12:
410-415
[Abstract].
22.
Madan, T.,
P. Eggleton,
U. Kishore,
P. Strong,
S. S. Aggrawal,
P. U. Sarma, and
K. B. M. Reid.
1997.
Binding of pulmonary surfactant proteins A and
D to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia enhances phagocytosis and killing by
human neutrophils and alveolar macrophages.
Infect. Immunol.
65:
3171-3179
[Abstract].
23.
Tino, M. J., and
J. R. Wright.
1999.
Surfactant proteins A and D specifically
stimulate directed actin-based responses in alveolar macrophages.
Am. J. Physiol.
276:
L164-L174
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24.
Kuan, S. F.,
A. Persson,
D. Parghi, and
E. Crouch.
1994.
Lectin-mediated interactions of surfactant protein D with alveolar macrophages.
Am. J. Respir.
Cell Mol. Biol.
10:
430-436
[Abstract].
25.
Cai, G. Z.,
G. L. Griffin,
R. M. Senior,
W. J. Longmore, and
M. A. Moxley.
1999.
Recombinant SP-D carbohydrate recognition domain is a chemoattractant for human neutrophils.
Am. J. Physiol.
276:
L131-L136
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Holmskov, U.,
P. Lawson,
B. Teisner,
I. Tornoe,
A. C. Willis,
C. Morgan,
C. Koch, and
K. B. M. Reid.
1997.
Isolation and characterization of a new
member of the scavenger receptor superfamily, glycoprotein-340 (gp-340),
as a lung surfactant protein-d binding molecule.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:
13743-13749
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27.
Chroneos, Z. C.,
R. Abdolrasulnia,
J. A. Whitsett,
W. R. Rice, and
V. L. Shepherd.
1996.
Purification of a cell-surface receptor for surfactant protein A.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:
16375-16383
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Finlay, B. B., and
S. Falkow.
1997.
Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61:
136-169
.
[Abstract]
29.
Henderson, B.,
S. Poole, and
M. Wilson.
1996.
Bacterial modulins: a novel
class of virulence factors which cause host tissue pathology by inducing cytokine synthesis.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:
316-341
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30.
Ofek, I., and J. D. Doyle. 1994. Bacterial Adhesion to Cells and Tissues.
Chapman and Hall, New York.
31.
Lim, B. L.,
J. Y. Wang,
U. Holmskov,
H. J. Hoppe, and
K. B. Reid.
1994.
Expression of the carbohydrate recognition domain of lung surfactant protein D and demonstration of its binding to lipopolysaccharides of gram-negative bacteria.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
202:
1674-1680
[Medline].
32.
Hancock, R. E.,
L. M. Mutharia,
L. Chan,
R. P. Darveau,
D. P. Speert, and
G. B. Pier.
1983.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis: a class of serum-sensitive, nontypable strains deficient in lipopolysaccharide O side chains.
Infect. Immunol.
42:
170-177
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33.
Reading, P. C.,
J. Allison,
E. C. Crouch, and
E. M. Anders.
1999.
Increased
susceptibility of diabetic mice to influenza virus infection: compromise of collectin-mediated host defence of the lung by glucose?
J. Viol.
72:
6884-6887
.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34.
Mariencheck, W., and
J. R. Wright.
1999.
A metalloproteinase secreted by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa degrades pulmonary surfactant protein A (SP-A).
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
159:
A506
.
35.
Korfhagen, T. R.,
V. Sheftelyevich,
M. S. Burhans,
M. D. Bruno,
G. F. Ross,
S. E. Wert,
M. T. Stahlmann,
A. H. Jobe,
M. Ikegami,
J. A. Whitsett, and
J. H. Fisher.
1998.
Surfactant protein-D regulates surfactant phospholipid
homeostasis in vivo.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:
28438-28443
[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36.
Botas, C.,
F. Poulain,
J. Akiyama,
C. Brown,
L. Allen,
J. Goerke,
J. Clements,
E. Carlson,
A. M. Gillespie,
C. Epstein, and
S. Hawgood.
1998.
Altered surfactant homeostasis and alveolar type II cell morphology in mice
lacking surfactant protein D.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:
11869-11874
[Abstract/Free Full Text].