|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Article |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although various methods of immune stimulation have been attempted for treatment of thoracic malignancies, none have proven to be reliably effective (1). In contrast, immune-based therapies have proven more successful in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (4, 5), leading to the misconception that thoracic malignancies are nonimmunogenic and will not be amenable to immunologic interventions. In ground-breaking studies, however, Boon and colleagues found that protective immunity can be generated against nonimmunogenic murine tumors (6, 7). These studies suggest that a tumor's apparent lack of immunogenicity is indicative of a failure to elicit an effective host response rather than a lack of tumor antigen expression (8, 9). Accordingly, a new paradigm emerged that focused on generating antitumor responses by therapeutic vaccination (10, 11). In this setting, vaccination refers to an intervention that unmasks tumor antigens leading to generation of specific host-immune responses against the tumor.
Several techniques have been used to detect tumor antigens (Ags) that are recognized by humoral and/or cellular
immune responses. In this issue of the Red Journal, Robinson and colleagues report results using a technique referred
to as "serologic analysis of recombinant complementary
DNA (cDNA) expression libraries," or SEREX, to identify
tumor antigens (12). This technique identifies antibody responses generated in patients with malignant mesothelioma (MM) by using sera from the patients to interact with tumor
cDNA libraries to identify specific Ags. Of particular interest is the finding of antibodies to topoisomerase II
in 13 of
14 patients with MM. The discovery of shared tumor antigens in patients with MM may have implications for both
the diagnosis and eventual immune targeting of this disease,
and these authors are applauded for initiating this process.
In addition, Robinson and associates found that the number
of serum reactivities correlated with patient survival, but
the significance of this observation will require further
study. In contrast to the use of cloned cell lines used in their
study, the SEREX technique is most often applied with fresh tumors to avoid potential in vitro artifacts. And although SEREX is a powerful method to search for tumor
antigens, certain caveats should be noted. For example, antigenic epitopes that undergo conformational changes when
expressed in bacteria will not be detected (12). Similarly,
glycosylated epitopes will escape detection. Modifications
of the SEREX method are currently being developed to
identify particular classes of antigens (13).
Although tumor reactive antibodies have been reported to have a high frequency in patients with cancer, these antibodies have not always correlated with disease activity or effective immunity (14). For example, Qin and coworkers found that diminished tumor immunogenicity could be caused by nonprotective humoral responses that disable CD4 help for cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)- mediated tumor immunity (15). Thus, B-cell responses may actually inhibit induction of T-cell-dependent immunity, and studies have suggested that antibodies could have a tolerogenic effect on protein Ag (16). In contrast, other studies suggest that humoral tumor antigens can function as rejection antigens. The evidence for this includes antitumor responses in experimental models after monoclonal antibody therapy (20) and the intriguing observation that serum antibodies against p53 correlated with both improved survival and limited stage in lung cancer patients (21).
The SEREX approach has now been used to define many epitopes, and some of these may be important in thoracic malignancies (22, 23). The largest number are serologically defined antigens that correspond to previously unknown genes. Other epitopes identified by SEREX have been previously identified as tumor antigens recognized by CTL. NY-ESO-1 is a SEREX-defined antigen originally found in esophageal carcinoma and subsequently noted to be recognized by CTL in lung cancer (22, 24). Thus, NY-ESO-1 has been suggested as a potential target for lung cancer immunotherapy (24). Tumor antigens originally defined by T-cell responses have also been noted in SEREX evaluation. These include members of the melanoma antigen (MAGE) family, including MAGE-3, which has been noted to be expressed by lung cancers (25, 26). Thus, these findings are evidence of a complex host response to tumor antigens and raise the possibility that those epitopes identified by both serologic and CTL methods may have the potential to be used clinically to exploit this interplay.
Most investigations in this field have sought to identify Ags capable of eliciting a T-cell-mediated immune response (27). The majority of these tumor antigens is detected by first transfecting either genomic DNA or cDNA libraries into cells expressing the appropriate major histocompatibilty complex (MHC) phenotype, and then using antitumor CTL to identify specificity against the transfectants (28). A second technique to identify tumor antigens includes in vitro sensitization of T cells to candidate antigens. These T-cell clones are then assessed for their capacity to respond to tumor cells by either specific release of cytokines or cytolytic activity (28). A third and technically difficult technique is the elutriation of tumor peptides from tumor cells with subsequent assessment of the peptides for their capacity to stimulate CTL (29). In all of these techniques, the critical step is recognition of T-cell responses against antigenic epitopes.
Tumor antigens recognized by T cells can be categorized into four general groups (30). Type I antigens result from somatic mutations in normal gene products. Examples are the point mutations in connexin 37 discovered in Lewis lung carcinoma by Mandelboim and colleagues (31). These peptides, termed MUT1 and MUT2, can be used in lung cancer models to immunize and protect mice against tumor challenge, as well as mediate regression of established lung cancer (32). Type II antigens are those resulting from mutated oncogenes, although it is proposed that the likelihood of a mutation generating an immunodominant epitope is a rare event (35). For example, p53 has been shown to generate CTL responses in lung cancer (36); however, it is not yet known whether these mutations can generate effective, protective immunity. In addition, viral antigens expressed by tumors thought to be of viral origin can also be included among the Type II antigens. Although SV40 proteins have been detected in MM, the role of these proteins in the pathogenesis of this malignancy remains controversial. Waheed and associates (37) recently showed that antisense to SV40 early gene regions induced growth arrest and apoptosis in SV40 T-antigen positive MM. The actual significance of these provocative findings awaits further evaluation. Type III antigens are normal gene products having restricted tissue distribution. These antigens include the MAGE and GAGE antigen families that were initially defined in melanoma, and several of these antigens are expressed in lung cancers (38- 40). Type IV antigens have been referred to as "differentiation antigens" and consist of normal tissue-specific gene products. These antigens have been discovered in melanoma and include tyrosinase and MART-1 (26).
There is good evidence to suggest that tumor antigens recognized by CTL play pivotal roles in tumor rejection (41). CTL have the capacity to discriminate subtle changes in antigens expressed by the MHC class I pathway. Acting in concert with CTL, CD4+ T cells function to induce and extend the CTL response by producing cytokines requisite for a fully functional cell-mediated response (35). CD4 cells may also be responsible for recognition of MHC class II-dependent epitopes (42). However, not all tumor-associated antigens recognized by CTL serve as tumor rejection antigens (30). The most prevalent tumor antigens recognized by T cells are actually self-antigens (43), suggesting that tumor immunity may be viewed as a form of autoimmunity (44). The clinical manifestations of the theory linking tumor immunity and autoimmunity are best exemplified in melanoma; patients who develop vitiligo have a better prognosis and are more likely to respond to therapy (45). Similarly, in vivo tumor model systems have shown that immunotherapy directed against tumor antigens can induce autoimmune disease (46, 47). However, autoimmunity is not a prerequisite because effective tumor reduction can be achieved when tumor immunity and autoimmunity are uncoupled (44).
Despite the identification of a repertoire of tumor antigens, hurdles persist in the pathway to finding successful immune-based therapies. First, an immune response to a malignancy may not develop as a result of tolerance (48). It has been suggested that the single most important determinant of tumor rejection antigen potency is the avidity of the cognate CTL (49). The tolerogenic response appears to eliminate high-avidity T cells but spares the low-avidity CTL effector populations (50). Thus, the most effective cancer immunotherapies may be those interventions that significantly activate the low-avidity T-cell populations. A second major problem, well documented in thoracic and other malignancies, is the active immune suppression induced by the tumor itself (48). Tumor-reactive T cells have been shown to accumulate in lung cancer tissues but fail to respond because of suppressive tumor cell-derived factors (51). Moreover, tumor cells may also direct surrounding inflammatory cells to release suppressive cytokines in the tumor milieu (52, 53). For example, tumor-derived prostaglandin (PG)E2 has been documented to orchestrate an imbalance in the production of suppressive- and immune-potentiating cytokines by lymphocytes and macrophages in the tumor environment (52). Specifically, tumor-derived PGE2 can upregulate the transcriptional rate of interleukin (IL)-10 in human lymphocytes (52), which leads to a decrement in the activities of both T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APC) in the tumor-bearing host (34). Importantly, effective antitumor responses can be restored through abrogation of tumor PGE2 production (54).
Lung cancer cells also have defects in antigen processing and diminished MHC expression (55, 56), rendering them ineffective as APC. Thus, as defined in elegant studies by Huang and colleagues (57), professional APC play a major role in the immune response against cancer. This has led to the recent emphasis on the use of professional APC as the major source of tumor antigen presentation in vivo in genetic immunotherapies. Dendritic cells (DC) are highly specialized professional APC with the potent capacity to capture, process, and present antigen to T cells (58). Unfortunately, tumor cells interfere with host DC maturation and function (59, 60). To circumvent the in vivo inhibition of DC maturation and function, protocols have been developed that enable DC to undergo cytokine-stimulated maturation ex vivo. These cells can then be used to generate antigen-specific CTL responses in a variety of models, as well as in clinical trials (33, 61). In this context, delivery of tumor antigens by ex vivo-stimulated DC may be superior to purified peptides in avoiding CTL tolerization (68), and vaccination with multiple tumor antigens may be superior to the use of a single epitope (68, 69). Thus, another method of exposing the DC to a wide array of tumor antigens is the administration of DC intratumorally after ex vivo maturation. Introducing immune-potentiating cytokine genes into these DC further enhances the antitumor response. For example, intratumorally administered, cytokine gene-modified DC were found to take up antigen at the tumor site, traffick to regional and systemic lymph nodes, and generate systemic antitumor responses and long-term immunity (70). Intratumoral therapy with cytokine gene-modified DC yielded systemic antitumor effects comparable to those achieved with specific tumor-antigen-pulsed DC. This finding may have important implications in human lung cancer, where at this time, specific tumor antigen-based therapies are difficult to achieve (11). Although additional specific tumor antigens may be identified, immunization with individual peptides may contribute to tolerance (68). Peptide-induced tolerization of CTL has resulted in the inability of animals to reject antigen-expressing tumors (68), and strong evidence has been presented for immunoselection of antigen-loss variants in human cancer (5, 71). These limitations could be circumvented by the use of intratumoral DC- based genetic immunotherapies in which the tumor provides an array of immunogenic epitopes in situ. The effective use of activated DC administered intratumorally without antigen pulsing ex vivo implies that cross-presentation, the MHC class I-restricted presentation of exogenous antigens leading to CD8+ T-cell responses (72), is operative. In fact, DC have been implicated as the APC predominantly effective in cross-presentation (73). In accord with these findings, novel tumor antigen delivery systems using cytokine gene-transduced tumor cells and DC (61, 64) or fusion of tumor cells with DC have resulted in induction of antitumor immunity (74, 75). A recent clinical study in which tumor cell-dendritic cell hybrids were administered to 17 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma resulted in seven antitumor responses, including four complete antitumor responses (4).
The identification of new tumor antigens and the results from preliminary clinical trials are reasons for cautious optimism. Despite the recent strides in identification of tumor antigens and the technical advances in genetic immunotherapy, our understanding of the host's failure to respond to these antigens is in its infancy. The pathway to clinical application of these newly defined antigens will require studies that contribute to a more complete picture of the complex tumor-host interactions that foster progressive tumor growth in thoracic malignancies.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Steven M. Dubinett, M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, 37-131 Center for Health Sciences, 10833 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1690. E-mail: sdubinet{at}ucla.edu
(Received in original form March 17, 2000).
Abbreviations: antigens, Ags; antigen presenting cell(s), APC; complementary DNA, cDNA; cytotoxic T lymphocyte(s), CTL; dendritic cells, DC; major histocompatibility complex, MHC; malignant mesothelioma, MM; prostaglandin E2, PGE2; serologic analysis of recombinant cDNA expression libraries, SEREX.| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
O'Reilly, E. M.,
D. H. Ilson,
L. B. Saltz,
R. Heelan,
L. Martin, and
D. P. Kelsen.
1999.
A phase II trial of interferon
-2
and carboplatin in patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma.
Cancer Invest
17:
195-200
[Medline].
2.
Sterman, D. H.,
L. R. Kaiser, and
S. M. Albelda.
1999.
Advances in the
treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Chest
116:
504-520
3. Dubinett, S. M. 1996. The immune response of lung tumors and the effects of cytokine administration on pulmonary immune cells. In Immunopathology of Lung Disease. R. Kradin and B. Robinson, editors. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA. 469-490.
4. Kugler, A, G. Stuhler, P. Walden, G. Zoller, A. Zobywalski, P. Brossart, U. Trefzer, S. Ullrich, C. A. Muller, V. Becker, A. J. Gross, B. Hemmerlein, L. Kanz, G. A. Muller, and R. H. Ringert. 2000. Regression of human metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumor cell-dendritic cell hybrids. Nat. Med. 6: 332-336 [Medline].
5.
Thurner, B.,
I. Haendle,
C. Roder,
D. Dieckmann,
P. Keikavoussi,
H. Jonuleit,
A. Bender,
C. Maczek,
D. Schreiner,
P. von den Driesch,
E. B. Brocker,
R. M. Steinman,
A. Enk,
E. Kampgen, and
G. Schuler.
1999.
Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived
dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of
some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma.
J. Exp. Med.
190:
1669-1678
6.
Van Pel, A., and
T Boon.
1982.
Protection against a nonimmunogenic
mouse leukemia by an immunogenic variant obtained by mutagenesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:
4718-4722
7. Boon, T., and L. Old. 1997. Cancer tumor antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 681-683 [Medline].
8. Boon, T., T. F. Gajewski, and P. G. Coulie. 1995. From defined human tumor antigens to effective immunization? Immunol. Today 16: 334-336 [Medline].
9.
Boon, T., and
P. van der Bruggen.
1996.
Human tumor antigens recognized
by T lymphocytes.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
725-729
10. Pardoll, D.. 1998. Cancer vaccines. Nat. Med. 4(Suppl.): 525-531 [Medline].
11. Dubinett, S. M., P. W. Miller, S. Sharma, and R. K. Batra. 1998. Gene therapy for lung cancer. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 12: 569-594 [Medline].
12. Sahin, U., O. Tureci, and M. Pfreundschuh. 1997. Serological identification of human tumor antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 709-716 [Medline].
13. Tureci, O., U. Sahin, and M. Pfreundschuh. 1997. Serological analysis of human tumor antigens: molecular definition and implications. Mol. Med. Today 3: 342-349 . [Medline]
14. Disis, M. L., and M. A. Cheever. 1996. Oncogenic proteins as tumor antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8: 637-642 [Medline].
15. Qin, Z., G. Richter, T. Schueler, S. Ibe, X. Cao, and T. Blankenstein. 1998. B cells inhibit induction of T cell-dependent tumor immunity. Nat. Med. 4: 627-630 [Medline].
16.
Eynon, E. E., and
D. C. Parker.
1992.
Small B cells as antigen-presenting
cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens.
J. Exp. Med.
175:
131-138
17.
Fuchs, E. J., and
P. Matzinger.
1992.
B cells turn off virgin but not memory
T cells.
Science
258:
1156-1159
18.
Rowley, D. A., and
R. M. Stach.
1993.
A first or dominant immunization: I. Suppression of simultaneous cytolytic T cell responses to unrelated alloantigens.
J. Exp. Med.
178:
835-840
19.
Simitsek, P. D.,
D. G. Campbell,
A. Lanzavecchia,
N. Fairweather, and
C. Watts.
1995.
Modulation of antigen processing by bound antibodies can
boost or suppress class II major histocompatibility complex presentation
of different T cell determinants.
J. Exp. Med.
181:
1957-1963
20.
Hara, I.,
Y. Takechi, and
A. N. Houghton.
1995.
Implicating a role for immune recognition of self in tumor rejection: passive immunization against
the brown locus protein.
J. Exp. Med.
182:
1609-1614
21.
Winter, S. F.,
Y. Sekido,
J. D. Minna,
D. McIntire,
B. E. Johnson,
A. F. Gazdar, and
D. P. Carbone.
1993.
Antibodies against autologous tumor
cell proteins in patients with small-cell lung cancer: association with improved survival.
J. Natl. Cancer. Inst.
85:
2012-2018
22. Chen, Y. T., M. J. Scanlan, U. Sahin, O. Tureci, A. O. Gure, S. Tsang, B. Williamson, E. Stockert, M. Pfreundschuh, and L. J. Old. 1997. A testicular antigen aberrantly expressed in human cancers detected by autologous antibody screening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1914-1918.
23.
Brass, N.,
D. Heckel,
U. Sahin,
M. Pfreundschuh,
G. Sybrecht, and
E. Meese.
1997.
Translation initiation factor elF-4
is encoded by an amplified gene and induces an immune response in squamous cell lung carcinoma.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6:
33-39
24. Lee, L., R. F. Wang, X. Wang, A. Mixon, B. E. Johnson, S. A. Rosenberg, and D. S. Schrump. 1999. NY-ESO-1 may be a potential target for lung cancer immunotherapy. Cancer J. Sci. Am. 5: 20-25 . [Medline]
25. Yoshimatsu, T., I. Yoshino, A. Ohgami, M. Takenoyama, T. Hanagiri, K. Nomoto, and K. Yasumoto. 1998. Expression of the melanoma antigen-encoding gene in human lung cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 67: 126-129 [Medline].
26. Takaki, T., A. Hiraki, A. Uenaka, S. Gomi, K. Itoh, H. Udono, A. Shibuya, T. Tsuji, S. Sekiguchi, and E. Nakayama. 1998. Variable expression on lung cancer cell lines of HLA-A2-binding MAGE-3 peptide recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Int. J. Oncol. 12: 1103-1109 . [Medline]
27. Rosenberg, S. A.. 1999. A new era for cancer immunotherapy based on the genes that encode cancer antigens. Immunity 10: 281-287 [Medline].
28. De Plaen, E., C. Lurquin, B. Lethe, P. van der Bruggen, V. Brichard, J. C. Renauld, P. Coulie, A. Van Pel, and T. Boon. 1997. Identification of genes coding for tumor antigens recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes. Methods 12: 125-142 . [Medline]
29.
Cox, A. L.,
J. Skipper,
Y. Chen,
R. A. Henderson,
T. L. Darrow,
J. Shabanowitz,
V. H. Engelhard,
D. F. Hunt, and
C. L. Slingluff Jr..
1994.
Identification of a peptide recognized by five melanoma-specific human cytotoxic
T cell lines.
Science
264:
716-719
30. Gilboa, E.. 1999. The makings of a tumor rejection antigen. Immunity 11: 263-270 [Medline].
31. Mandelboim, O., G. Berke, M. Fridkin, M. Feldman, M. Eisenstein, and L. Eisenbach. 1994. CTL induction by a tumour-associated antigen octapeptide derived from a murine lung carcinoma. Nature 369: 67-71 [Medline].
32. Mandelboim, O., E. Vadai, M. Fridkin, A. Katz-Hillel, M. Feldman, G. Berke, and L. Eisenbach. 1995. Regression of established murine carcinoma metastases following vaccination with tumour-associated antigen peptides. Nat. Med. 1: 1179-1183 [Medline].
33. Mayordomo, J. I., T. Zorina, W. J. Storkus, L. Zitvogel, C. Celluzzi, L. D. Falo, C. J. Melief, S. T. Ildstad, W. M. Kast, A. B. Deleo, and M. T. Lotze. 1995. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumor peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Nat. Med. 1: 1297-1302 [Medline].
34.
Sharma, S.,
M. Stolina,
Y. Lin,
B. Gardner,
P. W. Miller,
M. Kronenberg, and
S. M. Dubinett.
1999.
T cell-derived IL-10 promotes lung cancer growth by
suppressing both T cell and APC function.
J. Immunol.
163:
5020-5028
35. Yewdell, J. W., and J. R. Bennink. 1999. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17: 51-88 [Medline].
36. Ciernik, I. F., J. A. Berzofsky, and D. P. Carbone. 1996. Human lung cancer cells endogenously expressing mutant p53 process and present the mutant epitope and are lysed by mutant-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2: 877-882 [Abstract].
37.
Waheed, I.,
Z. S. Guo,
G. A. Chen,
T. S. Weiser,
D. M. Nguyen, and
D. S. Schrump.
1999.
Antisense to SV40 early gene region induces growth arrest
and apoptosis in T-antigen-positive human pleural mesothelioma cells.
Cancer Res.
59:
6068-6073
38.
Nakao, M.,
S. Shichijo,
T. Imaizumi,
Y. Inoue,
K. Matsunaga,
A. Yamada,
M. Kikuchi,
N. Tsuda,
K. Ohta,
S. Takamori,
H. Yamana,
H. Fujita, and
K. Itoh.
2000.
Identification of a gene coding for a new squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by the CTL.
J. Immunol.
164:
2565-2574
39. Iwamoto, O., Y. Nagao, S. Shichijo, M. Eura, T. Kameyama, and K. Itoh. 1997. Detection of MAGE-4 protein in sera of patients with head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 70: 287-290 [Medline].
40.
Shichijo, S.,
M. Nakao,
Y. Imai,
H. Takasu,
M. Kawamoto,
F. Niiya,
D. Yang,
Y. Toh,
H. Yamana, and
K. Itoh.
1998.
A gene encoding antigenic
peptides of human squamous cell carcinoma recognized by cytotoxic T
lymphocytes.
J. Exp. Med.
187:
277-288
41. Townsend, A., and H. Bodmer. 1989. Antigen recognition by class I-restricted T lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7: 601-624 [Medline].
42.
Jager, E.,
D. Jager,
J. Karbach,
Y. T. Chen,
G. Ritter,
Y. Nagata,
S. Gnjatic,
E. Stockert,
M. Arand,
L. J. Old, and
A. Knuth.
2000.
Identification of
NY-ESO-1 epitopes presented by human histocompatibility antigen
(HLA)-DRB4*0101-0103 and recognized by CD4(+) T lymphocytes of
patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing melanoma.
J. Exp. Med.
191:
625-630
43.
Houghton, A. N..
1994.
Cancer antigens: immune recognition of self and altered self.
J. Exp. Med.
180:
1-4
44.
Bowne, W. B.,
R. Srinivasan,
J. D. Wolchok,
W. G. Hawkins,
N. E. Blachere,
R. Dyall,
J. J. Lewis, and
A. N. Houghton.
1999.
Coupling and uncoupling of tumor immunity and autoimmunity.
J. Exp. Med.
190:
1717-1722
45. Rosenberg, S. A., and D. E. White. 1996. Vitiligo in patients with melanoma: normal tissue antigens can be targets for cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 19: 81-84 [Medline].
46.
Ludewig, B.,
A. F. Ochsenbein,
B. Odermatt,
D. Paulin,
H. Hengartner, and
R. M. Zinkernagel.
2000.
Immunotherapy with dendritic cells directed
against tumor antigens shared with normal host cells results in severe autoimmune disease.
J. Exp. Med.
191:
795-804
47.
Overwijk, W. W.,
D. S. Lee,
D. R. Surman,
K. R. Irvine,
C. E. Touloukian,
C. C. Chan,
M. W. Carroll,
B. Moss,
S. A. Rosenberg, and
N. P. Restifo.
1999.
Vaccination with a recombinant vaccinia virus encoding a "self" antigen induces autoimmune vitiligo and tumor cell destruction in mice: requirement for CD4(+) T lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:
2982-2987
48. Sogn, J. A.. 1998. Tumor immunology: the glass is half full. Immunity 9: 757-763 [Medline].
49.
Zeh, H. J. III,
D. Perry-Lalley,
M. E. Dudley,
S. A. Rosenberg, and
J. C. Yang.
1999.
High avidity CTLs for two self-antigens demonstrate superior
in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy.
J. Immunol.
162:
989-994
50. Poplonski, L., B. Vukusic, J. Pawling, S. Clapoff, J. Roder, N. Hozumi, and J. Wither. 1996. Tolerance is overcome in beef insulin-transgenic mice by activation of low-affinity autoreactive T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26: 601-609 [Medline].
51.
Yoshino, I.,
T. Yano,
M. Murata,
T. Ishida,
K. Sugimachi,
G. Kimura, and
K. Nomoto.
1992.
Tumor-reactive T-cells accumulate in lung cancer tissues
but fail to respond due to tumor cell-derived factor.
Cancer Res.
52:
775-781
52. Huang, M., S. Sharma, J. T. Mao, and S. M. Dubinett. 1996. Non-small cell lung cancer-derived soluble mediators and prostaglandin E2 enhance peripheral blood lymphocyte IL-10 transcription and protein production. J. Immunol. 157: 5512-5520 [Abstract].
53.
Alleva, D. G.,
C. J. Burger, and
K. D. Elgert.
1994.
Tumor-induced regulation of suppressor macrophage nitric oxide and TNF-
production: role of
tumor-derived IL-10, TGF-
and prostaglandin E2.
J. Immunol.
153:
1674-1686
[Abstract].
54.
Stolina, M.,
S. Sharma,
Y. Lin,
M. Dohadwala,
B. Gardner,
J. Luo,
L. Zhu,
M. Kronenberg,
P. Miller,
J. Lee, and
S. M. Dubinett.
2000.
Specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 restores antitumor immunity by altering the balance of IL-10 and IL-12 synthesis.
J. Immunol.
164:
361-370
55.
Restifo, N. P.,
F. Esquivel,
Y. Kawakami,
J. W. Yewdell,
J. J. Mule,
S. A. Rosenberg, and
J. R. Bennink.
1993.
Identification of human cancers deficient in antigen processing.
J. Exp. Med.
177:
265-272
56.
Hiraki, A.,
T. Kaneshige,
K. Kiura,
H. Ueoka,
H. Yamane,
M. Tanaka, and
M. Harada.
1999.
Loss of HLA haplotype in lung cancer cell lines: implications for immunosurveillance of altered HLA class I/II phenotypes in lung
cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res.
5:
933-936
57.
Huang, A. Y. C.,
P. Golumbek,
M. Ahmadzadeh,
E. Jaffee,
D. Pardoll, and
H. Levitsky.
1994.
Role of bone marrow-derived cells in presenting MHC
class I-restricted tumor antigens.
Science
264:
961-965
58. Banchereau, J., and R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245-252 [Medline].
59. Gabrilovich, D. I., H. L. Chen, K. R. Girgis, H. T. Cunningham, G. M. Meny, S. Nadaf, D. Kavanaugh, and D. P. Carbone. 1996. Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 2: 1096-1103 [Medline].
60.
Kiertscher, S. M.,
J. Luo,
S. M. Dubinett, and
M. D. Roth.
2000.
Tumors
promote altered maturation and early apoptosis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells.
J. Immunol.
164:
1269-1276
61. Miller, P. W., S. Sharma, M. Stolina, K. Chen, L. Zhu, R. W. Paul, and S. M. Dubinett. 1998. Dendritic cells augment granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)/herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase-mediated gene therapy of lung cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 5: 380-389 [Medline].
62. Nestle, F., S. Alijagic, M. Gilliet, Y. Sun, S. Grabbe, R. Dummer, G. Burg, and D. Schadendorf. 1998. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 4: 328-332 [Medline].
63.
Ribas, A.,
L. Butterfield,
W. McBride,
S. Jilani,
L. Bui,
C. Vollmer,
R. Lau,
V. Dissette,
B. Hu,
A. Chen,
J. Glaspy, and
J. Economou.
1997.
Genetic
immunization for the melanoma antigen MART-1/Melan-A using recombinant adenovirus-transduced murine dendritic cells.
Cancer Res.
57:
2865-2869
64. Sharma, S., P. Miller, M. Stolina, L. Zhu, M. Huang, R. Paul, and S. M. Dubinett. 1997. Multi-component gene therapy vaccines for lung cancer: effective eradication of established murine tumors in vivo with interleukin 7/ Herpes simplex thymidine kinase-transduced autologous tumor and ex vivo-activated dendritic cells. Gene Therapy 4: 1361-1370 [Medline].
65.
Zitvogel, L.,
J. I. Mayordomo,
T. Tjandrawan,
A. B. DeLeo,
M. R. Clarke,
M. T. Lotze, and
W. J. Storkus.
1996.
Therapy of murine tumors with tumor peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulation, and T helper cell 1-associated cytokines.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
87-97
66.
Boczkowski, D.,
S. Nair,
D. Snyder, and
E. Gilboa.
1996.
Dendritic cells
pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo.
J. Exp. Med.
184:
465-472
67.
Celluzzi, C. M.,
J. I. Mayordomo,
W. J. Storkus,
M. T. Lotze, and
L. D. Falo Jr..
1996.
Peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induce antigen-specific, CTL-mediated protective tumor immunity.
J. Exp. Med.
183:
283-287
68.
Toes, R.,
E. van der Voort,
S. Schoenberger,
J. Drijfhout,
L. van Bloois,
G. Storm,
W. Kast,
R. Offringa, and
C. Melief.
1998.
Enhancement of tumor
outgrowth through CTL tolerization after peptide vaccination is avoided
by peptide presentation on dendritic cells.
J. Immunol.
160:
4449-4456
69.
Fields, R. C.,
K. Shimizu, and
J. J. Mule.
1998.
Murine dendritic cells pulsed
with whole tumor lysates mediate potent antitumor immune responses in
vitro and in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:
9482-9487
70. Miller, P., S. Sharma, M. Stolina, L. Butterfield, J. Luo, Y. Lin, M. Dohadwala, R. Batra, J. Economou, and S. M. Dubinett. 2000. Intratumoral administration of adenoviral interleukin-7 gene-modified dendritic cells augments specific antitumor immunity and achieves tumor eradication. Human Gene Therapy 11: 53-65 [Medline].
71. Jager, E., M. Ringhoffer, J. Karbach, M. Arand, F. Oesch, and A. Knuth. 1996. Inverse relationship of melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in melanoma tissues and CD8+ cytotoxic-T-cell responses: evidence for immunoselection of antigen-loss variants in vivo. Int. J. Cancer 66: 470-476 [Medline].
72.
Bevan, M. J..
1995.
Antigen presentation to cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo.
J. Exp. Med.
182:
639-641
73. Waldrop, S., C. Pitcher, D. Peterson, V. Maino, and L. Picker. 1997. Determination of antigen-specific memory/effector CD4+ T cell frequencies by flow cytometry. J. Clin. Invest. 99: 1739-1750 [Medline].
74. Gong, J., D. Chen, M. Kashiwara, and D. Kufe. 1997. Induction of antitumor activity by immunization with fusions of dendritic and carcinoma cells. Nat. Med. 3: 558-561 [Medline].
75.
Celluzzi, C., and
L. J. Falo.
1998.
Cutting edge: physical interaction between
dendritic cells and tumor cells results in an immunogen that induces protective and therapeutic tumor rejection.
J. Immunol.
160:
3081-3085
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-C. Yang, R. K. Batra, S. Hillinger, K. L. Reckamp, R. M. Strieter, S. M. Dubinett, and S. Sharma Intrapulmonary Administration of CCL21 Gene-Modified Dendritic Cells Reduces Tumor Burden in Spontaneous Murine Bronchoalveolar Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3205 - 3213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-C. Yang, S. Hillinger, K. Riedl, L. Zhang, L. Zhu, M. Huang, K. Atianzar, B. Y. Kuo, B. Gardner, R. K. Batra, et al. Intratumoral Administration of Dendritic Cells Overexpressing CCL21 Generates Systemic Antitumor Responses and Confers Tumor Immunity Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2891 - 2901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |