|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although adrenomedullin (ADM) is implicated in the control of airway tone, regulation of ADM release from airway smooth-muscle cells (ASMCs) has not been explored. Preliminary experiments have indicated that human ASMC populations were heterogeneous in their rate of ADM release and expression of endothelin (ET)A and ETB receptors. We isolated these phenotypically distinct ASMCs from explants derived from the same airway segment. ASMCs possessing exclusively ETA receptors appeared smaller and proliferated faster than ETA/ETB isolates. Macroautoradiographic analysis confirmed the presence of both receptors in human bronchi. ADM release and messenger RNA expression was greater in ETA/ETB isolates compared with ETA isolates. No measurable ET release was detected from ASMCs. Exogenous ET-1 (1 to 100 nM) more potently stimulated the release of ADM from ETA/ETB compared with ETA isolates. In addition, ET-3 (1 to 100 nM) stimulated ADM release only from ETA/ETB isolates, implicating the ETB receptor in this response. Exogenous ET-1 potentiated platelet- derived growth factor-stimulated [3H]thymidine uptake in ETA/ ETB but not ETA isolates. ET-3 did not affect [3H]thymidine uptake in either cell type. Possession of ETA/ETB receptors is associated with higher rates of ADM release and slower proliferation, but a capacity for ET-1 stimulated DNA synthesis via ETA receptors. These results support a paracrine role for the regulation of ADM release predominantly via the ETB receptor in human ASMCs.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conditions characterized by airflow obstruction, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there may be structural alterations in the airway wall in addition to alterations in airway tone. The thickening of the bronchial smooth muscle in these conditions contributes to increased tone in the asthmatic airway and ultimately leads to fixed airflow obstruction in COPD (1). Proliferation and hypertrophy of airway smooth-muscle (ASM) cells (ASMCs) are implicit in this process of airway remodeling (2).
Many endogenous mediators have been implicated in the control of airway tone and structure. Of these, endothelin (ET)-1 has an important role in the human airway, being a potent constrictor of ASM (3, 4), and a promoter of ASMC growth (5). ET is expressed and secreted by airway epithelial cells (6, 7) and vascular endothelial cells, as well as inflammatory cells such as macrophages (7). Evidence supporting a role for ET-1 in the pathogenesis of airway disease comes from studies demonstrating increased levels of ET-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma (8), and increased expression of ET-1 in biopsies of asthmatic airways (6). ETA and ETB receptor subtypes have been identified in human ASM (9) and cultured ASMCs (5, 10). Both ETA and ETB receptors have been reported to mediate bronchoconstriction in humans (4, 11), but only the ETA receptor appears to be involved in ASMC proliferation (5).
Another peptide with a potentially important role in the human airway is adrenomedullin (ADM). This recently discovered peptide, originally isolated from human phaeochromocytoma (12), has been intensively studied in the circulation, where it acts as vasodilator (13, 14). It is expressed at a higher level in the lung than in other tissues, except the adrenal glands (15, 16), and is a potent bronchodilator in guinea pigs (17). In human lung, immunohistochemical staining has demonstrated that ADM is expressed in ASM (18), and a high density of ADM receptors has also been demonstrated in rat lung (19). Distinct cross talk has been demonstrated between ADM and ET in vascular cells, where ADM inhibits ET release (20) and ET stimulates ADM release (21). Recently it was shown that ADM secretion by canine aortic endothelial cells is enhanced by activation of the ETB receptor (22).
Despite the potential importance of ADM in the control of airway tone and remodeling, there is no information regarding the regulation of ADM secretion from ASMCs. We hypothesized that ADM is released by human ASM cells and that its secretion may be regulated by the ET system. Our results demonstrate that ADM is expressed and released by human ASM. Further, the rate of ADM release from individual isolates was heterogeneous, higher rates of release being associated with the possession of ETB receptors. Stimulation of ETB receptors also lead to increased ADM secretion. Our findings support the paracrine/autocrine regulation of ADM release by ET in the bronchial wall.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents
Medium 199 (M199), Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM),
fetal bovine serum (FBS), antibiotic/antimycotic solution, trypsin- ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and Trizol reagent were purchased from Life Technologies (Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK). Sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) and ET-3 were from Peninsula Laboratories (St. Helens, UK). ET-1 and BQ123 were from Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp. (Beeston, Nottingham, UK). Na125I, 125I-ET-1 (specific activity = 74 Bq/fmol) ligand, [
-32P]deoxycytidine triphosphate
(dCTP), [methyl-3H]-thymidine (25 Ci/mmol), and the Megaprime
DNA labeling system were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
(Little Chalfont, Bucks, UK). Human ADM(1-52) and human
ADM(22-52) were synthesized by Dr. P. Byfield (CRC, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK). Cy3-conjugated antirabbit immunoglobulin (Ig) G was from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories,
Inc. (West Grove, PA). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-
BB, the monoclonal antibody to
-smooth-muscle actin (IA4) and
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antimouse IgG were
purchased from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, UK) and all other reagents were from Sigma or Merck (Leicestershire, UK).
Isolation of Human ASMC
Proximal segments of lobar bronchi (luminal diameter, approximately 5 to 7 mm) were obtained from resected lung specimens from patients undergoing lung or heart-lung transplantation for fibrosing alveolitis (n = 1), pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to Eisenmenger's syndrome (n = 1), emphysema (n = 1), or COPD (n = 1); or from lobectomy for bronchial carcinoma (n = 3). Further specimens were available from donor tissues at transplantation (n = 1). Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committees of Harefield and Hammersmith Hospitals. Samples of bronchus were placed in M199 for transport to the laboratory and kept at 4°C for up to 12 h. Airways were opened to expose the epithelial surface, which was removed by gentle scraping with a scalpel; the tissue was rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); and the smooth-muscle layer was cut into approximately 2-mm3 cubes. In initial studies, pooled cell populations were obtained from multiple explants from the same airway. Explants were placed at regular intervals in 25-cm2 flasks coated with collagen (Type I rat tail; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and left to adhere overnight. Fresh M199/20% FBS was then added to the flasks. Cells were generally seen growing from explants after 7 to 10 d in culture, and reached confluence by 3 to 4 wk. All cells were grown at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air in a humidified incubator (ICN Model 160; ICN Biomedicals Ltd., Thame, Oxon., UK). At confluence, cells were trypsinized and plated into 75-cm2 flasks in M199/10% FBS. Subsequent passages were carried out at confluence, dividing one flask into three. Cells were used for experiments between passages 3 and 7.
For isolation of cells from individual explants, a cloning ring approach was adopted, based on the method described by Frid and colleagues (23). Explants from the same bronchial segment were placed at least 20 mm apart on a 90-mm petri dish coated with collagen, allowed to adhere overnight, and then incubated in M199/ 20% FBS. When cells were observed growing out of individual explants to cover a diameter of 6 to 7 mm, the medium was removed and small polypropylene cloning rings (internal diameter, 6 mm) were placed over each explant and its surrounding cells. A watertight seal with the petri dish was achieved with silicone grease on the underside of each ring. The cells inside the polypropylene ring were trypsinized as described earlier and the cells from each individual explant were plated into one well of a 12-well plate. On subsequent passages, the cells were transferred into a 25-cm2 flask and, on attaining confluence, into a 75-cm2 flask. Subsequently, cells were grown and passaged as described earlier.
Phenotypic Characterization of Cells
The smooth-muscle phenotype of isolated cells was investigated
with IA4 and a polyclonal antibody to smooth muscle-specific myosin (kindly provided by Dr. Maria Frid, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO) (23). For immunostaining, cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 103 cells/well in
M199/10% FBS in eight-well chamber slides (Life Technologies)
coated with collagen and grown for a further 2 d. Cells were fixed
in methanol at
20°C for 10 min, followed by three brief washes
in PBS at room temperature. Cells were incubated with primary
antibody for 1 h at room temperature and washed three times
with PBS. FITC-conjugated antimouse IgG or Cy3-conjugated antirabbit IgG secondary antibody were added, as appropriate, for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were counterstained with the nuclear stain 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (0.5 µg/ml in PBS) for 2 min, rinsed with PBS, and mounted in PBS/glycerol (1:1). Staining was visualized by fluorescence microscopy.
Serum-Induced Proliferation of ASMCs
To assess the rate of serum-induced proliferation of isolates, cells were seeded at a density of 1.5 × 104 cells/well in M199/10% FBS in 24-well plates. The day of plating was designated Day 0. Cells were replenished with fresh M199/10% FBS every 48 h. On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 13, and 15, three wells were washed with PBS and trypsinized with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA in PBS, and cells were counted by hemocytometer. Viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.
125I-ET-1 Binding Studies on ASMCs
Ligand binding studies in cultured cells were performed as previously described (24). Briefly, ASMCs were seeded at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well in 48-well plates and grown to confluence. For studies of 125I-ET-1 binding, cells were incubated for 120 min at 37°C in 0.5 ml DMEM containing 0.3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 1,000 Bq (50 pM) 125I-ET-1. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of excess (1 µM) unlabeled human ET-1. The proportion of ETA/ETB receptor subtypes present was initially estimated by incubating cells with 125I-ET-1 in the presence or absence of BQ123 (10 nM), a specific ETA receptor antagonist. This concentration of BQ123 was previously determined in our laboratory to completely compete for 125I-ET-1 binding at ETA sites but not at ETB sites. Binding sites were further characterized by competition experiments whereby cells were incubated with 125I-ET-1 (50 pM) in the presence of increasing concentrations (0 to 10 µM) of either BQ123 or ET-3.
After incubation, cells were washed twice with 0.5 ml ice-cold assay buffer and lyzed with 0.2 M NaOH containing 0.1% (wt/ vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for counting bound 125I-peptide. Protein concentration was assayed with the Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad, North Yorkshire, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Binding data were analyzed by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism version 2.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).
Quantitative In Vitro Autoradiographic Analysis of 125I-ET-1 Binding in Human Bronchi
ET binding sites in human bronchi (5 to 7 mm luminal diameter;
n = 8) were localized and characterized using in vitro autoradiography as previously described (25). Briefly, 10-µm-thick cryostat sections were cut at
20°C and thaw-mounted onto Vectabond-coated microscope slides. Sections were preincubated for 10 min
at 20 to 22°C in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL [pH 7.4], 100 mM
NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 28 µM bacitracin), followed by incubation for 120 min in binding buffer containing 0.5% BSA and 100 pM 125I-ET-1. Sections were then washed three times for 5 min
each time in binding buffer at 4°C, and briefly washed in cold distilled water followed by rapid drying under a stream of cold air.
Nonspecific binding was defined as that remaining in adjacent
sections coincubated with 100 nM unlabeled human ET-1. The
proportions of ETA and ETB receptor subtypes were characterized by coincubation of consecutive sections with either BQ123
or S6c. Sections were apposed to Hyperfilm-3H together with radiolabeled standards for 3 d at 4°C. The resulting macroautoradiographic images were quantified using a KS300 Imaging System
(Image Associates, Thame, Oxon., UK). Standard curves were calculated, converting relative grey levels to ligand-bound (amol/ mm2) for each film.
ADM and ET Release from ASMCs
To determine whether ASMCs release ADM or ET, cells were
seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in six-well plates and
grown to 80 to 90% confluence. The cells were serum-starved by
washing once with serum-free M199 (SFM) followed by incubation in SFM for 2 h. For time-course studies, serum-starved cells
were then incubated in 2 ml M199/0.1% FBS for 6, 10, 24, and
48 h. At the designated time point, cells were counted and aliquots (1 ml) of culture media were collected, frozen immediately,
dried by rotary evaporation, and stored at
20°C. The dried samples were resuspended in assay buffer and submitted to radioimmunoassay (RIA) for ADM or ET.
In parallel experiments, we determined the effects of different concentrations of serum on ADM and ET immunoreactivity in ASMC conditioned medium. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 104 cells/well and grown to confluence. Cells were serum-starved for 2 h, followed by incubation for 24 h in 400 µl SFM alone or with 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, or 10% FBS. At the end of this period, medium was collected for RIA. The cells treated with SFM and M199/10% FBS were trypsinized and counted by hemocytometer. Viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.
ADM RIA
Samples were assayed for ADM immunoreactivity using a previously reported specific human RIA (26). Briefly, assays were performed in a final volume of 700 µl assay buffer comprising 0.06 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2) containing 0.3% (wt/vol) BSA, 10 mM EDTA, and 7 mM sodium azide. The antibody (designated FB8) was used at a final dilution of 1:10,000. The tracer was prepared by iodination of synthetic human ADM(22-52) by the Iodogen method and purification of the 125I-ADM(22-52) tracer by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Assays were incubated at 4°C for 3 d. Bound and free tracer were separated using dextran-coated charcoal. The detection limit of the assay was 2 fmol/tube and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.2 and 12.2%, respectively.
Characterization of ADM Immunoreactivity in ASMC Conditioned Medium
Characterization of immunoreactive ADM detected in conditioned medium was performed using Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography (FPLC) (Pharmacia, Herts., UK). For conditioning of medium, cells were grown to 80 to 90% confluence in T75 flasks. The cells were serum-starved for 2 h, followed by incubation in 12 ml of M199/0.1% FBS for 24 h. The conditioned medium was acidified with glacial acetic acid to a concentration of 0.5 M and extracted using Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters, Herts., UK) as previously described (24). FPLC of extracted medium was performed according to a previously published protocol (27). Dried samples were resuspended in water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, loaded onto a Pep-RPC C2/C18 reversed-phase column, and eluted with a linear gradient of 10 to 50% acetonitrile over 60 min. Fractions collected over 1-min periods were dried by rotary evaporation and submitted to RIA for ADM.
Northern Blot Analysis of ADM Messenger RNA
To extract total RNA, 106 to 107 cells were trypsinized, followed by centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min. The cell pellets were lyzed in Trizol Reagent (Life Technologies) and total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (50 µg) was fractionated, using denaturing 3-(N-Morpholino)propanesulfonic acid/formaldehyde/1% agarose gels, and transferred to Hybond-N (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) nylon membranes, followed by ultraviolet crosslinking.
Membranes were hybridized with a 900-base pair complementary DNA (cDNA) probe that included the coding sequence
for human ADM (16). The probe was labeled by the random primer
method using the Megaprime DNA labeling kit. Briefly, 10 ng of
the cDNA probe was mixed with the primers, boiled for 5 min
and cooled on ice. The reaction buffer containing deoxyadenosine triphosphate, deoxythymidine triphosphate, and deoxyguanidine triphosphate was added together with [
-32P]dCTP and the
Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 1 h and terminated by addition of 3 vol of TES
buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], containing 1 mM EDTA [pH
8.0] and 0.1% [wt/vol] SDS). The membranes were prehybridized in 30 ml of 5× saline sodium citrate (SSC) (1× = 0.15 M NaCl
and 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 5× Denhardt's (1× = 0.025%
polyvinylpyrrolidine, 0.02% Ficoll, and 0.02% BSA), 1% SDS,
and 5 ng/ml salmon-sperm DNA (Life Technologies) for 2 h at
60°C. Hybridization was performed overnight at 60°C in 15 ml of
prehybridization buffer plus 10% (wt/vol) dextran sulfate. Membranes were washed once with 2× SSC/0.2% SDS at 22°C for 10 min, followed by 0.2× SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C for 60 min.
Washed membranes were exposed to Kodak Biomax MR-1 film
(Sigma) at
70°C for 1 to 3 d. Membranes were then stripped of
radioactive probe by incubation in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) containing 0.5% (wt/vol) SDS for 15 min at 80°C. Membranes were then probed for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to determine the RNA loading in each lane.
Effect of ADM on Intracellular Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Accumulation
The effect of exogenous ADM on intracellular cyclic adenosine
monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation was measured as an indicator of a functional role for ADM. ASMCs were seeded at a
density of 1.5 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates and grown to confluence. On the day of the experiment, cells were serum-starved
for 3 h, then treated in the absence or presence of 100 nM ADM
in SFM containing 50 µM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine for 15 min
as previously described (24). After treatment, cells were extracted overnight at
20°C in 250 µl acid ethanol (75% ethanol
and 16 mM HCl). Extracts were dried and assayed for cAMP
content using a commercially available RIA kit (DuPont, Stevenage, Herts., UK).
ET RIA
Samples of conditioned media were assayed for ET immunoreactivity using a previously reported specific RIA (28). Briefly, assays were performed in a final volume of 700 µl assay buffer comprising 0.06 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2) containing 0.3% (wt/ vol) BSA, 10 mM EDTA, and 7 mM sodium azide. The antibody (designated BP6) was used at a final dilution of 1:5,000. The 125I- ET-1 tracer was prepared by iodination of synthetic human ET-1 using the Iodogen method and purified by reversed-phase HPLC. Assays were incubated at 4°C for 3 d. Bound and free tracer were separated using dextran-coated charcoal. The detection limit of the assay was 0.05 fmol/tube and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.2 and 11.4%, respectively. This assay cross-reacts fully with ET-1 and displays 60 and 40% cross-reactivity with ET-2 and ET-3, respectively.
Effect of ET on ADM Release from ASMCs
To investigate whether there was cross talk between the ET and
ADM systems, the effects of different concentrations of ET-1 and
ET-3 on basal ADM release by ASMCs were examined. For these experiments, cells were seeded in 48-well plates at a density of
5 × 103 cells/well and grown to confluence. Cells were serum-starved for 2 h, followed by incubation for 24 h in 400 µl M199/
0.1% FBS containing 0.01 to 100 nM ET-1 or ET-3 with 0.1%
FBS alone as a control. At the end of this period, 300 µl of the
medium was frozen immediately, dried by rotary evaporation,
and stored at
20°C until RIA for ADM. Cells treated with
M199/0.1% FBS alone, M199/0.1 %FBS containing 100 nM ET-1,
or M199/0.1% FBS containing 100 nM ET-3 were all counted by
hemocytometer. Viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.
Effect of ET on DNA Synthesis
The growth response of human ASM cells was determined by measurement of [3H]thymidine incorporation, representing DNA synthesis. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well, grown to 80 to 90% confluence, and then quiesced by serum-starvation for 2 h, followed by incubation in M199/ 0.1% FBS for 72 h. To determine the effect of treatments upon DNA synthesis, quiescent cells were incubated in the presence of 0.25 µCi/well [3H]thymidine for 24 h. To examine the effect of ET-1 or ET-3 on basal or PDGF-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation, quiescent cells were incubated in M199/0.1% FBS with or without 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB for 24 h in the presence or absence of 100 nM of each peptide. At the end of this period, the cells were rapidly washed three times with PBS at 4°C, followed by addition of 1 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 4°C, to each well. The plate was left at 4°C for 30 min, the TCA was discarded, and the TCA insoluble fraction was dissolved in 0.2 M NaOH. The plate was stored at 4°C overnight, after which the [3H]thymidine content of the lysates was determined by scintillation counting.
To assess whether ET-1 or ET-3 potentiated the PDGF-induced proliferation of ASMCs, cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 104 cells, grown to approximately 30 to 40% confluence, and quiesced for 72 h as described earlier. Quiescent cells were then incubated in M199/0.1% FBS with or without 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB in the presence or absence of 100 nM of either ET-1 or ET-3, which were replenished every 2 d. Cells were counted at Days 2, 4, and 7 by hemocytometer. Viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.
Statistical Analyses
To compare responses between isolates and concentration-response data within isolates, data were compared by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's test using GraphPad Prism version 2.01 (GraphPad Software).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heterogeneity between ASMC Isolates
For our initial studies, we used isolates from six separate
subjects (one secondary PH, one emphysema, one fibrosing alveolitis, and three carcinoma), each comprising a
pooled population of cells from multiple explants from the
same individual. All populations demonstrated > 90% positive immunofluorescent staining for
-smooth-muscle actin
and smooth muscle-specific myosin (not shown). However, there were evident phenotypic differences as the cells of
four populations (one secondary PH, one emphysema, one
fibrosing alveolitis, and one carcinoma) grew to confluence more rapidly and appeared smaller and more densely
packed than the other two populations (two carcinoma).
BQ123, an ETA-selective antagonist, completely inhibited
125I-ET-1 binding in the faster-growing populations (designated ETA cells). In the slower-growing populations (designated ETA/ETB cells), BQ123 only partially inhibited binding, implying that a proportion of the sites were likely to
be of the ETB subtype (Figure 1A). In addition, we demonstrated that all the ASMC populations secreted immunoreactive ADM into the culture medium (Figure 1B). However, the rate of release differed markedly between
the two cell populations, secretion from ETA/ETB cells being 3- to 5-fold higher than that from ETA cells.
|
Subsequently, cloning rings were used to isolate these
two ASMC phenotypes from the same individuals by isolating cells growing from individual explants. Using this
technique, two explant isolates were obtained from one individual (donor) and six from a second individual (COPD).
Initial characterization of these cells using competition
with 10 nM BQ123 to distinguish between 125I-ET-1 binding to receptor subtypes indicated that 50% of the isolates
from each individual possessed ETA receptors and 50% possessed a mixed population of ETA/ETB receptors. All
isolates demonstrated > 90% positive immunofluorescent
staining for
-smooth-muscle actin and smooth muscle-
specific myosin, confirming their smooth-muscle phenotype
(data not shown).
Characterization of ASMCs: Morphology and Serum-Induced Growth
When ETA and ETA/ETB ASMCs were grown to a confluent monolayer, differences were noted in their morphology under phase-contrast illumination. The ETA isolates (Figure 2A) appeared smaller and more densely packed than the ETA/ETB isolates (Figure 2B). In addition, the ETA ASMCs demonstrated a higher doubling rate (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; 1.73 ± 0.12 d) than ETA/ETB cells (mean ± SEM; 3.16 ± 0.68 d) in the presence of 10% FBS (Figure 2C). Further, the plateau density of the ETA ASMCs (71.9 ± 8.3 cells/mm2) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than that of the ETA/ETB ASMCs (25.3 ± 4.0 cells/mm2).
|
Analysis of 125I-ET-1 Binding Sites on ASMCs
To confirm the ET receptor profiles of the isolated ASMCs, we examined competition for 125I-ET-1 binding using the ETA-selective antagonist BQ123 and the ETB-selective agonist ET-3. Specific binding of 125I-ET-1 to ETA ASMCs (Figure 3A) demonstrated concentration-dependent competition by both BQ123 and ET-3 with nonlinear regression analysis of the competition data, indicating that binding curves were best explained by a single-site model. The affinity of this site was higher for BQ123 (concentration for half-maximal inhibition [IC50] = 5.21 ± 2.53 nM) than ET-3 (IC50 = 327.7 ± 94.1 nM) (n = 3 per group), indicating these cells possess ETA receptors alone. In contrast, analysis of the competition curves for ETA/ETB cells revealed that the binding was best explained by a two-site model (Figure 3B). The ETA sites were defined according to their high affinity for BQ123 (IC50 = 3.75 ± 2.12 nM) and low affinity for ET-3 (IC50 = 622.7 ± 89 nM), whereas the ETB sites displayed high affinity for ET-3 (IC50 = 0.25 ± 0.07 nM) and low affinity for BQ123 (> 1 µM). The relative proportions of ETA and ETB sites were 31 ± 3% and 69 ± 3%, respectively. In addition, the density of equilibrium 125I-ET-1 binding (50 pM) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in ETA/ETB ASMCs (84.6 ± 15.1 fmol/mg protein; n = 4) than in ETA ASMCs (25.8 ± 7.6 fmol/mg protein; n = 4).
|
ET Receptor Localization in Human Bronchi
To determine the ET receptor profile in human bronchial smooth muscle in vitro, we performed macroautoradiographic analysis of 125I-ET-1 binding sites to bronchi in cryostat sections (Figure 4). ET binding was localized to the bronchial smooth muscle and epithelium as well as the lung parenchyma and pulmonary vasculature. Competition for ET binding in serial sections using BQ123 and S6c to eliminate ETA and ETB binding, respectively, demonstrated ETA binding in the airway epithelium and bronchial vessels and a relatively low level of ETA binding to bronchial smooth muscle. In contrast, binding to ETB sites predominated in bronchial smooth muscle. Equilibrium 125I-ET-1 binding to bronchial smooth muscle was determined as 271.9 ± 50.8 amol/mm2, whereas the nonspecific binding was 7.3 ± 1.0 amol/mm2 (n = 8). The density of ETA binding sites was 50.4 ± 12.3 amol/mm2 and that of ETB binding sites was 213 ± 34.5 amol/mm2. The proportion of total binding sites was 19.2 ± 2.9% ETA and 80.7 ± 5.0% ETB.
|
ADM and ET Release from ASMCs
All ASMC isolates secreted immunoreactive ADM into the culture medium at a linear rate, but the amount released differed markedly between the ETA and ETA/ETB isolates (Figure 5A). The rate of immunoreactive ADM release by ETA/ETB ASMCs (mean 261 ± 16 fmol/105 cells/24 h; n = 4) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than by ETA ASMCs (mean = 57 ± 12 fmol/105 cells/24h; n = 4) (Figure 5B). ADM release was modulated by the serum concentration in both cell types, release in the presence of 0.1 to 0.3% FBS being significantly greater (140 to 150%; P < 0.05) than in the absence of serum. In contrast, serum concentrations of 3 and 10% significantly inhibited 24-h ADM release in both cell types to approximately 80 and 35% (P < 0.01), respectively, of that measured in the absence of serum. FPLC analysis of conditioned medium from both ETA and ETA/ETB confirmed that the majority of the immunoreactive ADM co-eluted with synthetic human ADM (not shown).
|
In contrast, there was no detectable immunoreactive ET in the conditioned medium from any ASMC isolate of either phenotype over a 48-h period in M199/0.1% FBS or over 24 h in any of the serum concentrations tested.
Expression of ADM Messenger RNA in ASMCs
Northern blot analysis of total RNA from each isolate probed for ADM messenger RNA (mRNA) demonstrated a band of the expected 1.6 kb (16) in all eight explant isolate ASMCs (Figure 6A). Steady-state mRNA levels for ADM were consistently higher in the ETA/ETB ASMCs than in the ETA ASMCs.
|
Effect of ADM on Intracellular cAMP in ASMCs
To establish whether ETA and ETA/ETB ASMCs demonstrate functional responses to ADM, the effect of ADM on intracellular cAMP accumulation was assessed. In ETA cells treated with ADM, cAMP was elevated to approximately 250% of the SFM control (5.67 ± 0.61 pmol/105 cells versus 2.41 ± 0.24 pmol/105 cells; P < 0.05). In contrast, there was no effect of ADM on cAMP levels in ETA/ETB ASMCs (3.65 ± 0.18 pmol/105 cells versus 3.28 ± 0.11 pmol/105 cells).
Effect of ETs on ADM Release by ASMCs
To determine whether ADM release by ETA and ETA/ ETB ASMCs was modulated via ET receptors, we studied the effects of ET-1 (nonselective ETA and ETB) or ET-3 (ETB-selective) on 24-h ADM release. At a dose of 100 nM, ET-1 elicited a modest dose-dependent stimulation of ADM release by ETA ASMCs (Figure 7A). A stimulatory effect on ADM release from ETA ASMCs was observed only with a dose of 100 nM ET-3, whereas lower concentrations had no effect. In contrast, both ET-1 and ET-3 elicited concentration-dependent increases (> 150% of basal) in ADM release by ETA/ETB ASMCs (Figure 7B).
|
Effect of ETs on [3H]Thymidine Uptake by ASMCs
To determine whether ET-1 or ET-3 modulates DNA synthesis in ETA and ETA/ETB ASMCs, the effects of these peptides were studied on either basal (Figure 8A) or PDGF-BB-stimulated [3H]thymidine uptake over 24 h (Figure 8B). In ETA ASMCs, no effects of 100 nM ET-1 or ET-3 were observed upon either basal or PDGF-BB (10 ng/ml) stimulated DNA synthesis. In addition, 100 nM ET-1 or ET-3 did not significantly affect basal DNA synthesis in ETA/ETB ASMCs. In contrast, 100 nM ET-1, but not ET-3, significantly (P < 0.05) potentiated PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis in ETA/ETB cells to 140% of the response observed with PDGF-BB alone.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main finding of this study is that two subpopulations of smooth-muscle cells derived from the human airway are distinct with regard to their expression of ET receptors and ADM release. These subpopulations were also distinct with regard to cell morphology and serum-stimulated proliferation.
Explant isolates with mixed ETA/ETB receptors grew more slowly and released more ADM than ETA ASMCs. In addition, ETA/ETB ASMCs demonstrated enhanced secretion of ADM, predominantly in response to the ETB receptor agonist ET-3. Further, exogenous ET-1 potentiated PDGF-BB-stimulated DNA synthesis in ETA/ETB ASMCs, but not in ETA ASMCs. At first sight this implicates the ETB receptor in the observed responses. However, ET-3, an ETB agonist, had no effect on [3H]thymidine incorporation. Thus our favored explanation is an ETA mediated effect limited to ETA/ETB cells. This is plausible because differences in intracellular signaling pathways determining growth and differentiation between our populations are more likely to determine the outcome of a given mitogenic stimulus rather than simply the expression of cell-surface receptors.
In initial experiments studying isolates comprising pooled cells from individual subjects, we determined that there were phenotypic differences between populations on the basis of their ET-binding characteristics and rates of ADM release. In subsequent experiments, we successfully isolated distinct subpopulations of ASMC from individual explants derived from the same segment of airway wall, suggesting that these subpopulations exist in vivo. Using the cloning ring technique, we were able to isolate ETA and ETA/ETB populations from both patients studied. From our observations, the reason for isolating ETA cells more frequently using standard explant techniques is that ETA cells tend to proliferate faster from the explants than do the ETA/ETB cells and are thus over-represented in mixed culture.
Studies of isolated animal ASMCs have consistently shown that they possess a mixed ETA/ETB receptor population (29). In culture, human ASMCs possessing only ETA receptors were isolated from the bronchus (30), whereas tracheal cells with a mixture of ETA and ETB receptors have been demonstrated (5). In the present study, each ASMC isolate exhibited either ETA receptors alone or ETA and ETB receptors, and the existence of these two cell phenotypes may explain the apparent discrepancies between previous reports. Our study has not determined whether the ETA/ ETB cultures comprise cells that express both receptor subtypes or instead a mixed population of cells that are exclusively ETA or ETB. This will require further evaluation, but cell morphology by light microscopy indicated a homogeneous population of cells. Our results further demonstrate that human ASMCs secrete immunoreactive ADM but at different rates, according to their ET receptor profile. The concept of cellular heterogeneity in the human airway is well known, with groups reporting morphologically and pharmacologically distinct ASMC subtypes (30, 32). Heterogeneity is recognized between cells isolated from proximal and distal bronchi. In addition, distinct subpopulations of cell types are found at the same anatomical site in the bovine pulmonary artery (23). Evidence for a similar heterogeneity of airway smooth muscle is now emerging with evidence for biochemical, morphologic, and functional differences in cells isolated from the same airway segment (33). In addition, ASM demonstrates considerable plasticity of phenotype in culture, which makes comparison between phenotypes of cultured and in vivo cells difficult. However, our results indicate that stable differences in cell phenotype can be maintained in cell culture systems and suggest important functional differences between cells in the airway wall.
To characterize ET receptor profiles, full competition curves for 125I-ET-1 were derived using the specific ETA antagonist BQ123 and the selective ETB agonist ET-3. In each case, half of the isolates displayed typical high-affinity ETA receptors (ETA ASMCs) and half displayed a mixed population of ETA and ETB receptors (ETA/ETB ASMCs). The relative proportions of ETA and ETB receptors (31 versus 69%) in the ETA/ETB cells were similar to previously reported ratios in rat ASMCs (30) and human tracheal ASMCs (5). In addition, the density of ET receptors in ETA/ETB ASMCs was approximately 3-fold higher than ETA cells, which suggests that the density of ETA receptors was equivalent in both populations. We did not observe any change in the relative proportions of ETA and ETB receptors on ETA/ETB cells, a phenomenon reported in ovine ASMCs (31). The consistency of the ratio of ETA to ETB sites implies that the ETA/ETB isolates are a homogeneous population, inasmuch as cells that express only ETA receptors proliferate faster. Our data regarding localization of 125I-ET-1 binding sites in the ASM, airway epithelium, and lung parenchyma by in vitro macroautoradiography are consistent with previously reported studies (7, 9). We determined the relative proportions of ETA and ETB sites to be 19.2 and 80.7%, respectively, in bronchial smooth muscle, which is similar to a previous report (9).
Immunostaining for ADM has been demonstrated previously in human ASM (18), although secretion from isolated ASMCs has not been reported. We have now shown that ASMCs secrete authentic ADM at a linear rate, with the ETA/ETB ASMCs releasing ADM at a significantly faster rate than the ETA isolates. This difference in release rates was consistent with the relative levels of ADM mRNA expression by individual isolates. ADM release was stimulated in low (0.1 to 0.3%) concentrations of serum but inhibited at concentrations > 1%. Because serum controls were used in the RIA, it is unlikely this observation is an artifact due to serum cross-reactivity. A similar profile of serum responsiveness was previously reported in rat vascular endothelial cells (34). The implications of this effect have yet to be established regarding whether proliferation affects serum-stimulated proliferation or vice versa.
We examined the effect of ADM on cAMP elevation in the ASMC isolates as an indicator of receptors demonstrating a functional response to this peptide (20, 24). ADM stimulated cAMP accumulation in ETA ASMCs, whereas no response was observed in ETA/ETB ASMCs. This does not exclude the possibility of functional receptors on the ETA/ ETB ASMCs, inasmuch as their high rate of ADM release could mask a cAMP response. However, our observation of cAMP elevation in response to ADM in ETA ASMCs implies a functional role for ADM in ASM. ADM may act as a bronchodilator (17), but can also inhibit cell proliferation (35) and inhibit ET-1 release (20). Therefore the contribution of ADM as a regulator of muscle tone or modulator of remodelling, or its involvement in other aspects of airway physiology, have yet to be established.
In contrast to the high-level ADM release, we did not observe ET release from any of the ASMC isolates. It has been shown that ovine tracheal smooth-muscle cells express prepro-ET-1 and secrete ET-1 (36). Failure to detect ET-1 may be due to very low levels of release or an absence of ET-1 production, and indicates that there may be species differences in ET expression in ASMCs. In addition, our observation is consistent with immunohistochemical studies indicating a lack of ET immunoreactivity in human ASM (6, 7).
We investigated whether stimulation of ET receptor subtypes is involved in the regulation of ADM secretion in ASMCs. ET-1 is a weak stimulator of ADM release by rat vascular smooth-muscle cells (21) and enhances ADM secretion by human coronary artery cells by ETB receptor activation (22). In ETA cells, ET-1 elicited a weak concentration-dependent increase in ADM release, whereas ET-3 stimulated release only at a concentration of 100 nM, which is known to stimulate the ETA receptor (37). In contrast, both ET-1 and ET-3 elicited a concentration-dependent stimulation of ADM secretion by ETA/ETB cells. The effects of both peptides were comparable in ETA/ETB cells, implying that the ETB receptor was mediating this response. The functional significance of these findings remains to be determined. However, it is conceivable that ETB-stimulated ADM release is involved in homeostatic regulation of ASM tone, and partly attenuates the ETB-mediated bronchoconstriction reported in human airways (11).
We investigated whether ET-1 or ET-3 stimulates mitogenesis in human ASMCs. ET-1 is a potent mitogen to ASMCs isolated from experimental animals (29, 38), although the involvement of the ETA and ETB receptors in this response differs between reports (29, 38). ET-1 did not affect basal DNA synthesis in ETA or ETA/ETB ASMCs in the present study, and did not alter PDGF-BB-stimulated DNA synthesis in ETA cells. However, in ETA/ETB ASMCs, ET-1 potentiated the response to PDGF-BB by approximately 40%, whereas ET-3 had no effect, indicating that the response to ET-1 was mediated via the ETA receptor. Previous studies have demonstrated mitogenic (39) or comitogenic (5) effects of ET-1 on human ASMCs, ET-1 acting via the ETA receptor. As in the current study, no mitogenic effect was observed after ETB stimulation with ET-3 or S6c. However, our finding that ETA-mediated [3H]thymidine uptake is restricted to isolates with a mixed population of ETA and ETB receptors suggests that the ETB receptor may be a marker for a cell type possessing ETA-mediated signaling pathways coupled to growth and/or differentiation.
In summary, two phenotypically distinct smooth-muscle cell populations were isolated from explants of human ASM. These two populations differed both morphologically and in their rates of proliferation to serum, and could be differentiated by their expression of ET receptor subtypes and rates of ADM release. Interactions between the ET and ADM systems were established in ASMCs and demonstrated a stimulatory effect of ET on ADM release mainly via ETB receptors and a comitogenic effect of ET via ETA receptors. These observations provide further support for heterogeneity of human ASM and provide functional evidence for paracrine interactions between the ADM and ET systems within the human airway.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Nicholas W. Morrell, M.D., Dept. of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 157, Level 5, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail: nwm23{at}cam.ac.uk
(Received in original form October 17, 2000 and in revised form April 5, 2001).
Abbreviations: adrenomedullin, ADM; airway smooth muscle, ASM; ASM cell, ASMC; bovine serum albumin, BSA; cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cAMP; complementary DNA, cDNA; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA; endothelin, ET; fetal bovine serum, FBS; concentration for half-maximal inhibition, IC50; immunoglobulin, Ig; Medium 199, M199; messenger RNA, mRNA; phosphate-buffered saline, PBS; platelet-derived growth factor, PDGF; radioimmunoassay, RIA; Sarafotoxin 6c, S6c; sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS; standard error of the mean, SEM; serum-free M199, SFM.Acknowledgments: This study was supported by a grant from the British Heart Foundation (PG/99013). One author (N.W.M.) was a Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellow. The authors acknowledge Professor Sir M. Y. Yacoub and the transplant group at Harefield Hospital for providing tissue samples. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Xudong Yang for his technical assistance with primary cell culture, Dr. S. Sharma (Department of Metabolic Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine) for providing the human ADM cDNA, and Dr. A. Edgar (Department of Histochemistry, Imperial College School of Medicine) for supplying the GAPDH probe.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Lambert, R. K.,
B. R. Wiggs,
K. Kuwano,
J. C. Hogg, and
P. D. Pare.
1993.
Functional significance of increased airway smooth muscle in asthma and
COPD.
J. Appl. Physiol.
74:
2771-2781
2. Halayko, A. J., and N. L. Stephens. 1994. Potential role for phenotypic modulation of bronchial smooth muscle cells in chronic asthma. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 72: 1448-1457 [Medline].
3. Goldie, R. G., P. J. Henry, J. W. Paterson, J. M. Preuss, and P. J. Rigby. 1990. Contractile effects and receptor distributions for endothelin-1 (ET-1) in human and animal airways. Agents Actions Suppl. 31: 229-232 [Medline].
4. McKay, K. O., J. L. Black, L. M. Diment, and C. L. Armour. 1991. Functional and autoradiographic studies of endothelin-1 and endothelin-2 in human bronchi, pulmonary arteries, and airway parasympathetic ganglia. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 17(Suppl. 7):S206-S209.
5. Panettieri, R. A. J., R. G. Goldie, P. J. Rigby, A. J. Eszterhas, and D. W. Hay. 1996. Endothelin-1-induced potentiation of human airway smooth muscle proliferation: an ETA receptor-mediated phenomenon. Br. J. Pharmacol. 118: 191-197 [Medline].
6. Redington, A. E., D. R. Springall, Q. H. Meng, A. B. Tuck, S. T. Holgate, J. M. Polak, and P. H. Howarth. 1997. Immunoreactive endothelin in bronchial biopsy specimens: increased expression in asthma and modulation by corticosteroid therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 100: 544-552 [Medline].
7. Marciniak, S. J., C. Plumpton, P. J. Barker, N. S. Huskisson, and A. P. Davenport. 1992. Localization of immunoreactive endothelin and proendothelin in the human lung. Pulm. Pharmacol. 5: 175-182 [Medline].
8. Mattoli, S., M. Soloperto, M. Marini, and A. Fasoli. 1991. Levels of endothelin in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with symptomatic asthma and reversible airflow obstruction. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 88: 376-384 [Medline].
9. Goldie, R. G., P. J. Henry, P. G. Knott, G. J. Self, M. A. Luttmann, and D. W. Hay. 1995. Endothelin-1 receptor density, distribution, and function in human isolated asthmatic airways. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152: 1653-1658 [Abstract].
10. Henry, P. J.. 1999. Endothelin receptor distribution and function in the airways. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 26: 162-167 [Medline].
11. Fukuroda, T., S. Ozaki, M. Ihara, K. Ishikawa, M. Yano, T. Miyauchi, S. Ishikawa, M. Onizuka, K. Goto, and M. Nishikibe. 1996. Necessity of dual blockade of endothelin ETA and ETB receptor subtypes for antagonism of endothelin-1-induced contraction in human bronchi. Br. J. Pharmacol. 117: 995-999 [Medline].
12. Kitamura, K., K. Kangawa, M. Kawamoto, Y. Ichiki, S. Nakamura, H. Matsuo, and T. Eto. 1993. Adrenomedullin: a novel hypotensive peptide isolated from human pheochromocytoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 192: 553-560 [Medline].
13.
Heaton, J.,
B. Lin,
J. K. Chang,
S. Steinberg,
A. Hyman, and
H. Lippton.
1995.
Pulmonary vasodilation to adrenomedullin: a novel peptide in humans.
Am. J. Physiol.
268:
H2211-H2215
14. Ishiyama, Y., K. Kitamura, Y. Ichiki, S. Nakamura, O. Kida, K. Kangawa, and T. Eto. 1993. Hemodynamic effects of a novel hypotensive peptide, human adrenomedullin, in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 241: 271-273 [Medline].
15. Ichiki, Y., K. Kitamura, K. Kangawa, M. Kawamoto, H. Matsuo, and T. Eto. 1994. Distribution and characterization of immunoreactive adrenomedullin in human tissue and plasma. FEBS Lett. 338: 6-10 [Medline].
16. Kitamura, K., J. Sakata, K. Kangawa, M. Kojima, H. Matsuo, and T. Eto. 1993. Cloning and characterization of cDNA encoding a precursor for human adrenomedullin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194:720-725. [Published erratum Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994 202:643]
17. Kanazawa, H., N. Kurihara, K. Hirata, S. Kudoh, T. Kawaguchi, and T. Takeda. 1994. Adrenomedullin, a newly discovered hypotensive peptide, is a potent bronchodilator. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205: 251-254 [Medline].
18. Martinez, A., M. J. Miller, E. J. Unsworth, J. M. Siegfried, and F. Cuttitta. 1995. Expression of adrenomedullin in normal human lung and in pulmonary tumors. Endocrinology 136: 4099-4105 [Abstract].
19. Owji, A. A., D. M. Smith, H. A. Coppock, D. G. Morgan, R. Bhogal, M. A. Ghatei, and S. R. Bloom. 1995. An abundant and specific binding site for the novel vasodilator adrenomedullin in the rat. Endocrinology 136: 2127-2134 [Abstract].
20.
Kohno, M.,
H. Kano,
T. Horio,
K. Yokokawa,
K. Yasunari, and
T. Takeda.
1995.
Inhibition of endothelin production by adrenomedullin in vascular
smooth muscle cells.
Hypertension
25:
1185-1190
21. Sugo, S., N. Minamino, H. Shoji, K. Kangawa, and H. Matsuo. 1995. Effects of vasoactive substances and cAMP related compounds on adrenomedullin production in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 369:311-314. [Published erratum FEBS Lett. 1996 379:201]
22.
Jougasaki, M.,
J. A. Schirger,
R. D. Simari, and
J. C. Burnett.
1998.
Autocrine role for the endothelin-B receptor in the secretion of adrenomedullin.
Hypertension
32:
917-922
23.
Frid, M. G.,
A. A. Aldashev,
E. C. Dempsey, and
K. R. Stenmark.
1997.
Smooth muscle cells isolated from discrete compartments of the mature
vascular media exhibit unique phenotypes and distinct growth capabilities.
Circ. Res.
81:
940-952
24. Coppock, H. A., A. A. Owji, C. Austin, P. D. Upton, M. L. Jackson, J. V. Gardiner, M. A. Ghatei, S. R. Bloom, and D. M. Smith. 1999. Rat-2 fibroblasts express specific adrenomedullin receptors, but not calcitonin-gene-related-peptide receptors, which mediate increased intracellular cAMP and inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Biochem. J. 338: 15-22 .
25. Power, R. F., J. Wharton, Y. Zhao, S. R. Bloom, and J. M. Polak. 1989. Autoradiographic localization of endothelin-1 binding sites in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 13(Suppl. 5):S50-S56.
26.
Meeran, K.,
D. O'Shea,
P. D. Upton,
C. J. Small,
M. A. Ghatei,
P. H. Byfield, and
S. R. Bloom.
1997.
Circulating adrenomedullin does not regulate systemic
blood pressure but increases plasma prolactin after intravenous infusion in humans: a pharmacokinetic study.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
82:
95-100
27. Owji, A. A., J. V. Gardiner, P. D. Upton, M. Mahmoodi, M. A. Ghatei, S. R. Bloom, and D. M. Smith. 1996. Characterization and molecular identification of adrenomedullin binding sites in the rat spinal cord: a comparison with calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors. J. Neurochem. 67: 2172-2179 [Medline].
28. Lam, H. C., K. Takahashi, M. A. Ghatei, and S. R. Bloom. 1990. Presence of immunoreactive endothelin in human milk. FEBS Lett. 261: 184-186 [Medline].
29.
Carratu, P.,
M. Scuri,
J. L. Styblo,
A. Wanner, and
M. K. Glassberg.
1997.
ET-1 induces mitogenesis in ovine airway smooth muscle cells via ETA
and ETB receptors.
Am. J. Physiol.
272:
L1021-L1024
30. Maxwell, M. J., R. G. Goldie, and P. J. Henry. 1998. Ca2+ signalling by endothelin receptors in rat and human cultured airway smooth muscle cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 125: 1768-1778 [Medline].
31.
Maxwell, M. J.,
R. G. Goldie, and
P. J. Henry.
1998.
Altered ETB- but not
ETA-receptor density and function in sheep airway smooth muscle cells in
culture.
Am. J. Physiol
274:
L951-L957
32.
Halayko, A. J.,
E. Rector, and
N. L. Stephens.
1998.
Airway smooth muscle
cell proliferation: characterization of subpopulations by sensitivity to heparin inhibition.
Am. J. Physiol.
274:
L17-L25
33. Hirst, S. J., T. R. Walker, and E. R. Chilvers. 2000. Phenotypic diversity and molecular mechanisms of airway smooth muscle proliferation in asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 16: 159-177 [Abstract].
34.
Isumi, Y.,
H. Shoji,
S. Sugo,
T. Tochimoto,
M. Yoshioka,
K. Kangawa,
H. Matsuo, and
N. Minamino.
1998.
Regulation of adrenomedullin production in rat endothelial cells.
Endocrinology
139:
838-846
35. Kano, H., M. Kohno, K. Yasunari, K. Yokokawa, T. Horio, M. Ikeda, M. Minami, T. Hanehira, T. Takeda, and J. Yoshikawa. 1996. Adrenomedullin as a novel antiproliferative factor of vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Hypertens. 14: 209-213 [Medline].
36. Ergul, A., M. K. Glassberg, A. Wanner, and D. Puett. 1995. Characterization of endothelin receptor subtypes on airway smooth muscle cells. Exp. Lung Res. 21: 453-468 [Medline].
37. Zamora, M. A., E. C. Dempsey, S. J. Walchak, and T. J. Stelzner. 1993. BQ123, an ETA receptor antagonist, inhibits endothelin-1-mediated proliferation of human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 9: 429-433 .
38. Ohlstein, E. H., A. Arleth, H. Bryan, J. D. Elliott, and C. P. Sung. 1992. The selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist BQ123 antagonizes endothelin-1-mediated mitogenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 225: 347-350 [Medline].
39. Tomlinson, P. R., J. W. Wilson, and A. G. Stewart. 1994. Inhibition by salbutamol of the proliferation of human airway smooth muscle cells grown in culture. Br. J. Pharmacol. 111: 641-647 [Medline].
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |