|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum concentrations of catecholamines are high in patients
with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Because chemokines mediate the recruitment of neutrophils into
inflammatory sites, we addressed the question of whether dopamine (DA) is able to influence chemokine production in endothelial cells under basal and proinflammatory conditions.
To this end, lung microvascular endothelial cells (LMVEC) were
stimulated or not for 24 h with the bacterial toxins lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 µg/ml) or lipoteichonic acid (LTA) (10 µg/ml)
in the presence or absence of various concentrations of DA
(1-100 µg/ml). Whereas under basal and stimulatory conditions, the addition of DA to endothelial cells dose-dependently increased IL-8 production, the production of ENA-78
and Gro-
was significantly inhibited (P < 0.01). This effect
could still be demonstrated when the cells were stimulated for
up to 3 h with LPS before DA administration. Similar findings
were detected for the mRNA expression of these chemokines.
The influence of DA on chemokine production was not receptor mediated and could be prevented by antioxidants or radical scavengers. Moreover, addition of H2O2 to endothelial cells
gave results similar to those observed with DA stimulation, suggesting a pivotal role for reactive oxygen species in DA-mediated modulation of chemokine production in endothelial
cells. Our data thus demonstrate that DA administration results in the induction of oxidative stress, with profound effects
on endothelial chemokine production.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by an increased vascular permeability for plasma proteins and is observed after severe trauma or sepsis induced by gram-negative or gram-positive bacterial toxins, e.g., lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichonic acid (LTA). The prevalence of ARDS in patients suffering from multiple organ dysfunction or sepsis is high (1). Despite increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS and increased therapeutic progress, the high mortality of 36-52% in these patients still remains a clinical problem (2, 3).
Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated that
neutrophil recruitment is one of the fundamental steps in
the initiation of ARDS (4). Neutrophils adhere to the vessel wall and subsequently extravasate into the inflamed tissue along a chemotactic gradient. It is believed that chemotaxis is maintained through the production of chemokines,
synthesized by activated epithelial and endothelial cells.
Moreover, perpetuation of this response may depend on
the production of inflammatory cytokines that are secreted by the extravasating mononuclear cells. Previously
we have demonstrated that the microvascular endothelium is
more susceptible to LPS stimulation than macrovascular endothelial cells in regard to chemokine production (5). Most
chemokines do not display cell specifity; there are, however, some chemokines, all belonging to the CXC family,
that selectively attract neutrophils. Three such chemokines,
i.e., interleukin (IL)-8, growth-related gene
(Gro-
),
and epithelial neutrophil activating protein-78 (ENA-78), were found to be elevated in serum (6) and bronchial lavage-fluid (7) in patients with sepsis, emphasizing the role
of chemokines and neutrophil inflammation in ARDS.
In patients with sepsis, endogenous catecholamines are
released as consequence of stress or inflammation (8, 9).
Due to hemodynamic instability in these patients, treatment with catecholamines is frequently performed to restore adequate circulatory conditions. Consequently, serum catecholamine levels may increase more than 10-fold
(10, 11) compared with healthy individuals. In addition to
the hemodynamic properties of catecholamines, catecholamine-mediated modulation of the cytokine network
has been demonstrated in leukocytes. Although modulation of the cytokine network via
-adrenergic receptors is
well documented (12, 13), the role of oxidative stress induced by catecholamines has not been extensively studied
in this respect. Oxidative stress may be generated through
the monoamine oxidase (MAO) pathway (14), or, alternatively, through autooxidation of the catecholamine,
resulting in the formation of semi-quinones (15) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (16). Given the serum catecholamine concentrations reached in septic patients, it is likely that high concentrations of ROS may be generated
in vivo, and hence may oxidatively stress the endothelium.
Inasmuch as ROS are known to influence chemokine
production in a variety of cells, the present study was conducted to address the question of the extent to which Dopamine influences the production of three endothelial-derived
chemokines, i.e., IL-8, Gro-
, and ENA-78, that specifically
attracts neutrophils to sites of inflammation. Moreover, the
involvement of ROS herein was investigated.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents
In this study the following reagents were used: essential growth medium for microvascular cells (EGM-MV), fetal bovine serum (FBS), human epidermal growth factor (10 ng/ml), human fibroblast growth factor (4 ng/ml), vascular endothelial growth factor (2 ng/ml), ascorbic acid (75 µg/ml), hydrocortisone (0.2 mg/ml), heparin (1 mg/ml), insulin (5 ng/ml) and Trypsin/EDTA (T/E) were all from Cell Systems, Remagen, Germany. Trizol-Reagent, DNase, and dNTPs were from Gibco BRL, Eggenstein, Germany.
LTA, LPS, propanolol, sulpiride, SCH 23390, pargyline, and
L-ascorbic acid were from Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany. Dopamine (DA) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) were obtained from Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), 1st Strand
cDNA Synthesis Kit and Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green I
were from Roche, Mannheim, Germany. H2O2 was obtained from
Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Anti-hemoxygenase-1 mAb was
from Biomol, Hamburg, Germany. Phentolamine was purchased from Fluka, Taufkirchen, Germany. IL-8, Gro-
, and ENA-78 Immunoassays were obtained from R&D Systems GmbH, Wiesbaden,
Germany. All Primers were aquired from Perkin Elmer applied
Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany. SuperScript TM II Preamplification System was purchased from Life Technologies, Karlsruhe,
Germany. GBR 12909 was from Tocris, Bristol, UK.
Cell Culture
LMVEC were purchased from Cell Systems at passage 3-4. The cells were seeded in a density of 5,000 cells/cm2 in T25 flasks (Falcon) and cultured at 37°C, 95% relative humidity and 5% CO2 in EGM-MV according to the manufacturer's recommendation. After confluence, they were passaged by Trypsin/EDTA and subcultured (17) until the experiments were perfomed. All experiments were performed with LMVEC at passage 5.
Characterization of endothelial cells was performed on the
basis of a positive uptake of acetylated LDL, Factor VIII-related antigen expression and PECAM (CD31), and a negative staining
for
-smooth muscle actin.
Chemokine Production
LMVEC (1 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded in 24-well plates and
grown till confluence. The cells were either stimulated or not for various time periods with LPS (1 µg/ml) or LTA (10 µg/ml) in
the presence or absence of DA (1-100 µg/ml). In some experiments, the cells were stimulated for 1, 3, or 6 h with LPS before
the addition of DA. To study the involvement of receptors and
ROS in the mechanism by which DA exerts its effects, endothelial cells were preincubated for 1 h with the following receptor antagonists: the
-receptor antagonist phentolamine, the
-receptor
antagonist propanolol, the D1-receptor antagonist SCH 23390, and the D2/3 receptor antagonist sulpiride, in concentrations
ranging from 10
3 to 10
7 M or the antioxidants SOD (10-100
µg/ml), NAC (10-500 µg/ml) and L-ascorbic acid (10-1,000 µM).
Furthermore, the influence of H2O2 on chemokine production
was tested in a dose-dependent fashion (100-900 µM). At the
end of each experiment supernatants were collected and assessed
for IL-8, ENA-78, and Gro-
production by means of ELISA.
All ELISAs were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Sensitivity of the ELISA were < 0.8 pg/ml for IL-8, < 15 pg/ml for ENA-78, and < 5 pg/ml for Gro-
. Each experimental condition was performed in triplicate and each experiment was confirmed at least three times.
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
LMVEC were grown to confluence in T25 flasks and either stimulated or not with LPS in the presence or absence of dopamine in various concentrations. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol-Reagent according to manufacturer's instructions. DNase digestion was performed before reverse transcription to exclude amplification of genomic DNA.
500 ng of total RNA was reversed transcribed into cDNA according to the manufacturer's instructions, using the 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. cDNA was diluted in 20 µl DEPC-treated
water and stored at
30°C until quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. The oligonucleotides
used for PCR are listed in Table 1.
Specific DNA standards were generated by PCR amplification of cDNA, purification of the amplified products, and quantification by spectrophotometry. Real-time PCR of cDNA specimens and DNA standards were conducted in a total volume of 25 µl,
containing 2 µl FastStart DNA Master SYBR GreenI, 10 pMol of
gene-specific forward and reverse primers, 2 mM MgCl2 for
ENA-78, and 4 mM MgCl2 for IL-8 and Gro-
and 11.5 µl of water. The amplification profile for each sample was as follows: 2 min
at 50°C, 5 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of amplification for
IL-8 and ENA-78, and 55 cycles for Gro-
, each cycle consisting
of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and annealing/extension at
55/72°C for 1 min. Standard curves were generated for all chemokines. PCR efficiency was assessed from the slopes of the standard curves and was found to be between 90 and 100%. Linearity
of the assay could be demonstrated by serial dilution of all standards and cDNA. All samples were normalized for an equal expression of GAPDH. Each experiment was repeated three times
with similar results.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical software (Mann-Whitney test). A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Influence of DA on the Production of Chemokines in Endothelial Cells Under Basal Conditions
Previously we have demonstrated that microvascular endothelial cells produce IL-8, ENA-78, and Gro-
under
basal and inflammatory conditions. To test if DA could influence the production of LMVEC, the latter were stimulated with different concentrations of DA for various time
intervals. Whereas the production of IL-8 in LMVEC was
increased by DA in a dose-dependent fashion, the production of ENA-78 and Gro-
was decreased under these conditions (P < 0.01) (Figure 1A). In concordance with our
results obtained by ELISA, it was found that DA upregulated IL-8 mRNA (P < 0.01), while reducing the expression of ENA-78 and Gro-
mRNA (P < 0.01) (Figure 1B).
|
Maximal upregulation and inhibition occurred with a
concentration of 100 µg/ml of DA (P < 0.01), a concentration at which no cell toxicity was observed as determined
by trypan blue exclusion. Kinetic studies demonstrated
that the upregulation in IL-8 production in DA-stimulated
LMVEC preceded the inhibition in ENA-78 and Gro-
production in these cells. Although a significant upregulation in IL-8 production was already found between 6 and
14 h of DA stimulation (P < 0.05), DA did not significantly influence the production of ENA-78 and Gro-
at
this time point (Figure 2).
|
Influence of DA on Chemokine Production in LPS- or LTA-Stimulated Endothelial Cells
In patients with sepsis, endothelial cells may be activated
by LPS or LTA from gram-negative and -positive bacteria,
respectively. We therefore investigated whether DA could
also influence the production of chemokines under these
conditions. Similar to the inhibitory effect of DA on ENA-78
and Gro-
production in unstimulated endothelial cells,
the upregulation of these chemokines by LPS or LTA was
dose-dependently inhibited by DA in LMVEC (P < 0.01). In addition, DA significantly increased LPS-mediated upregulation in IL-8 production (P < 0.01) (Figure 3). Similar findings could be observed for IL-8, ENA-78, and Gro-
mRNA expression in LPS- and LTA-stimulated LMVEC
(data not shown).
|
DA-mediated downregulation in ENA-78 or Gro-
production was still observed when the cells were prestimulated with LPS for up to 3 h before addition of DA. This
was also found for the increase in IL-8 production (P < 0.05). Preconditioning of endothelial cells for 12 h with
DA before LPS stimulation was as effective as the simultaneous addition of DA and LPS with respect to the inhibition of ENA-78 and Gro-
and the upregulation of IL-8
production (data not shown). Although the influence of
DA preconditioning on chemokine production in LPS-stimulated endothelial cells waned in time, a significant inhibition in ENA-78 and Gro-
(P < 0.01) production was
still observed when DA preconditioned cells were cultured further in the absence of DA for 8 h before LPS
stimulation. Similar findings were observed for the upregulation in IL-8 production (Figure 4).
|
Polarity in Chemokine Secretion
To investigate if DA influenced the release of chemokines
either at the apical or basolateral side, LMVEC were cultured in transwells and stimulated or not at the apical side
with DA in the presence or absence of LPS. Both LPS
alone and DA alone increased the secretion of IL-8 preferentially at the apical side. The combination of DA and
LPS was more potent (P < 0.05) than either LPS or DA alone in this respect. In contrast, neither LPS, DA, nor the
combination thereof influenced the direction of Gro-
secretion (Figure 5).
|
Mechanism by which DA Mediates Alterations in Chemokine Production
To study the mechanism by which DA influenced chemokine production, various receptor antagonists and antioxidants were used. Neither adrenergic receptor antagonists
(phentolamin, propanolol), nor antagonists for dopaminergic receptors (SCH23390, sulpiride), used in concentrations known to block these receptors, were able to reverse
the influence of DA on chemokine production (data not shown). In contrast, NAC, ascorbic acid, and SOD completely prevented the influence of DA on IL-8, ENA-78,
and Gro-
production, demonstrating that DA exerts its
action on chemokine production through the generation
of ROS (Figure 6A-6C). Moreover, the addition of H2O2 to LMVEC mimicked the effect of DA stimulation completely (Figure 7). Because convention of DA by MAO results in the generation of H2O2, we tested in two ways to
see whether this pathway was involved in the influence of
DA on chemokine production. First, by using the DA uptake inhibitor GBR12909, we were not able to inhibit the
effect of DA. Second, by using a MAO inhibitor, i.e., pargyline, DA was still able to exert its effect on chemokine production (data not shown).
|
|
Previously we could demonstrate that DA induces the
expression of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) in endothelial
cells via an oxidative mechanism. Because it is known that
HO-1 can inhibit LPS responses in monocytes, we investigated whether the expression of HO-1 was obligatory for
DA's action on chemokine production. In LMVEC that were simultaneously stimulated with DA and the HO-1 inhibitor, zinc protoporphorine (ZnPP), no differences in
chemokine production were found when compared with
LMVEC that were stimulated with DA alone (data not
shown), suggesting that DA influenced chemokine production independently of HO-1 expression. Moreover,
when endothelial cells were prestimulated with DA in the
presence of cycloheximide, upregulation in IL-8 and downregulation in ENA-78 and Gro-
production was still observed when the cells were cultured further in the absence
of cycloheximide or DA. Thus, these data demonstrate that the influence of DA on chemokine production was not mediated through the induction of a modulatory protein (data
not shown).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neutrophil recruitment and migration through the endothelial lining is dominated by the local production of chemokines and the expression of adhesion molecules (18,
19). In patients with sepsis, the inflammatory response is
mainly initiated at the microvascular system in end organs
such as lung and kidney (20). The preference for the microvascular system may reside in the high susceptibility of
microvascular endothelial cells to respond to LPS or LTA
(21). Indeed, LPS-stimulated LMVEC strongly upregulate
the production of IL-8, ENA-78, and Gro-
, three chemokines which are found to be elevated in serum and bronchial lavage fluid of septic patients (5, 6). The early phase in sepsis is furthermore characterized by a so-called stress
response, in which endogenous catecholamines are released
in the circulation (8, 22). Because hemodynamic instability
occurs in most patients with sepsis, therapeutic intervention with high catecholamine concentrations is frequently
performed; hence, high serum concentrations of catecholamine can be observed in these patients (11).
Apart from their hemodynamic properties, catecholamines are known to influence the immune system via modulation of the cytokine network (23, 24). Although there is
ample evidence that this occurs through the activation of
-adrenergic receptors (25, 26), the role of oxidative stress
in this process has not yet been delineated. It has been appreciated that catecholamines are well suited to provide
oxidative stress in various ways (27, 28).The ability of catecholamines to produce damaging ROS, e.g., hydroxyl radicals (29, 30), is partly accomplished by action of the enzyme MAO (31, 32, 33). MAO catalyzes the oxidative deamination of DA resulting in the formation of H2O2. In
the presence of Fe2+, H2O2 is then further converted to hydroxyl radical (HO·) through the Fenton reaction (34).
Due to the unstable nature of the catechol ring, reactive
quinone molecules and superoxide (O2
) may be rapidly
formed via auto-oxidation, thereby providing a second
pathway through which ROS can be generated (35, 36). Auto-oxidation of the catechol ring can be prevented by
antioxidants such as NAC. ROS may have both beneficial
and deleterious effects on cells, depending on the concentration and system in which they have been studied (37,
38). As a consequence of their aggressive nature, high concentrations of ROS inevitably result in cyto- and genotoxicity. Low concentrations of ROS, however, may improve cellular redox status by increasing the amount of endogenous antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase, HO-1,
and ferritin (39). It has been suggested that this adaptive
response, particularly in endothelial cells, may underlie, at
least in part, the phenomenon of ischemic preconditioning
(40). Zahler and colleagues (41) were able to demonstrate
that preconditioning of endothelial cells by transient oxidative stress reduced the release of proinflammatory cytokines upon TNF-
stimulation. In keeping with this and
the high serum concentrations of catecholamines found in
patients with sepsis, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of DA on the production of three chemokines that are likely to play an important role in the onset or perpetuation of ARDS.
In the present study, we provide for the first time evidence that DA differentially regulates the production of
endothelial-derived chemokines. Whereas the production
of IL-8 is increased by DA, the production of ENA-78 and
Gro-
is downregulated under this condition. Similar to
the upregulation in IL-8 production, Gornikiewicz and coworkers (42) have shown that catecholamines and LPS
synergistically upregulated IL-6 production. In striking
contrast to their study, however, we demonstrated that
both up- and downregulation in chemokine production
were exclusively mediated via oxidative stress, since antioxidants, but not receptor antagonists, completely prevented the action of DA. The generation of superoxide
radicals was largely responsible for DA's action, as was
demonstrated by the neutralizing effect of SOD. Although
addition of H2O2 to LMVEC gave similar results with respect to chemokine production, our data do not support a
role for MAO in this process. Neither the MAO inhibitor pargylin nor the DA uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 were
able to inhibit the DA-induced effects, suggesting that reactive products, i.e., O2- and semi-quinones, generated via
autoxidation of the catechol ring, are likely responsible for
the altered chemokine production we observed. Although
ROS were clearly produced by DA, no cell toxicity was
detected when the cells were cultured for up to 72 h in the
presence of 100 µg/ml of DA, determined by trypan blue exclusion or release of lactate dehydrogenase (data not
shown). High concentrations of DA (> 200 µg/ml), however, were cytotoxic in both assays, and have not been
studied further. In relation to catecholamine concentrations reached in patients with sepsis, the concentrations of
DA used in this study to obtain a maximal effect was relatively high. It should be mentioned, however, that in contrast to our in vitro study in which DA is given only once, in patients with sepsis catecholamines are intravenously
infused over longer periods of time. Given the unstable
nature of the catechol ring and the changed pharmacokinetics of catecholamines in patients with sepsis (43), it is
likely that the absolute amount of reactive products in
these patients is much higher than in our cell culture system. Inasmuch as DA transcriptionally modulate chemokine production in unstimulated and LPS-stimulated endothelial cells, and nuclear factor (NF)-
B consensus
sequences are found in the promoter region of all three
chemokines (44, 45), activation of NF-
B could be an important proximal event in the modulation of chemokine
production by DA. Indeed, DA activates NF-
B in a dose-
and time-dependent fashion (data not shown). It should be mentioned, however, that NF-
B is a positive regulator of
chemokine production and thus may explain the upregulation in IL-8, but not the downregulation in Gro-
and
ENA-78 production unless an inhibitory protein under
control of NF-
B is induced. It has been demonstrated
that the HO-1 gene is under control of NF-
B activation (46) and that a high expression of HO-1 is associated with
inhibition of cytokine production in LPS-stimulated macrophages (47). Although HO-1 is induced by DA in endothelial cells (48), HO-1 expression was not obligatory for
the action of DA because both a HO-1 inhibitor, i.e., ZnPP,
and cycloheximide, were not able to revert the influence of
DA on chemokine production in endothelial cells.
DA-upregulated IL-8 production was found to be predominantly at the apical side. In contrast, DA did not
change the preference of Gro-
secretion, although the absolute amount of Gro-
was clearly reduced. Inasmuch as
chemotaxis of neutrophils occurs along a chemotactic gradient, our observations, with respect to the absolute
amount in chemokine production and the preference in
chemokine secretion, would suggest that DA may have antiinflammatory properties on neutrophils.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that DA is able to modulate the expression of chemokines in lung microvascular endothelial cells through the generation of ROS. These effects may be important in the treatment of sepsis-associated inflammatory responses such as ARDS, because modulation of chemokine production may have a large impact on the amount of neutrophils that infiltrate the lungs.
|
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Dr. Grietje Beck, M.D., Institute for Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: grietje.beck{at}anaes.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
Abbreviations: acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS; dopamine, DA; epithelial neutrophil activating protein-78, ENA-78; growth-related gene
, Gro-
; heme oxygenase 1, HO-1; interleukin-8, IL-8; lung microvascular endothelial cells, LMVEC; lipopolysaccharide, LPS; lipoteichonic acid, LTA; monoamine oxidase, MOA; N-acetylcysteine, NAC;
polymerase chain reaction, PCR; reactive oxygen species, ROS.
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by grants from the Forschungsfonds University of Mannheim.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ware, L. B., and
M. A. Matthey.
2000.
The acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N. Engl. J. Med
342:
1334-1347
2. Reynolds, H. N., M. McCunn, U. Borg, N. Habashi, C. Cottingham, and Y. Bar-Lavi. 1998. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: estimated incidence and mortality rate in a 5 million-person population base. Crit. Care 2: 29-34 [Medline].
3. Navarrete-Navarro, P., M. Ruiz-Bailen, R. Rivera-Fernandez, F. Guerro-Lopez, M. D. Pola-Gallego-de-Guzman, and G. Vazquez-Mata. 2000. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in trauma patients: ICU mortality and prediction factors. Intensive Care Med. 26: 1624-1649 [Medline].
4. Hasleton, P. S., and T. E. Roberts. 1999. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: an update. Histopathology 34: 285-294 [Medline].
5. Beck, G. Ch., B. Yard, A. Breedijk, K. van Ackern, and F. J. van der Woude. 1999. Release of CXC-chemokines by human lung microvascular endothelial cells (LMVEC) compared with macrovascular umbilical vein endothelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 118:298-305.
6. Miller, E. J., A. B. Cohen, and S. Nagao. 1992. Elevated levels of NAP-1/IL-8 are present in the airspace of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 146: 427-432 [Medline].
7. Villard, J., F. Dyaer-Pastrore, J. Hamacher, J. D. Aubert, S. Schlegel-Nauter, and L. Nicod. 1995. Gro alpha and Interleukin-1 in Pneumocystis carinii or bacterial Pneumonia and Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152: 1549-1554 [Abstract].
8. Hahn, P. Y., P. Wang, S. M. Tait, Z. F. Ba, S. S. Reich, and I. H. Chaudry. 1995. Sustained elevation in circulating catecholamine levels during polymicrobial sepsis. Shock 4: 269-273 [Medline].
9. Eldadah, M. K., P. H. Schwartz, R. Harrison, and C. J. L. Newth. 1991. Pharmacokinetics of dopamine in infants and children. Crit. Care Med. 19: 1008-1011 [Medline].
10. Bhatt-Mehta, V., M. C. Nahata, R. E. McClead, and J. A. Menke. 1991. Dopamine pharmacokinetics in critically ill newborn infants. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 40: 593-597 [Medline].
11. Le Corre, P., Y. Malledant, M. Tanguy, and R. Le Verge. 1993. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of dopamine in adult patients. Crit. Care Med 21: 1652-1657 [Medline].
12.
Hasko, G.,
T. P. Shanley,
G. Egnaczyk,
Z. H. Nemeth,
A. L. Salzmann,
S. E. Vizi, and
C. Szabo.
1998.
Exogenous and endogenous catecholamines inhibit the production of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 1
via a
adrenoreceptor mediated mechanism.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
125:
1297-1303
[Medline].
13.
Spengler, R. N.,
S. W. Chensue,
D. A. Giacherio,
N. Blenk, and
S. L. Kunkel.
1994.
Endogenous norepinephrine regulates tumor necrosis factor-
production from macrophages in vitro.
J. Immunol.
152:
3024-3031
[Abstract].
14. Lasbennes, F., R. Sercombe, and J. Seylaz. 1983. Monoamine oxidase activity in brain microvessels determined using natural and artificial substrates: relevance to the blood-barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 3: 521-528 [Medline].
15. Bindoli, A., M. P. Rigobello, and L. Galzigna. 1989. Toxicology of aminochromes. Toxicol. Lett. 48: 3-20 [Medline].
16. Smythies, J., and L. Galzigna. 1998. The oxidative metabolism of catecholamines in the brain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1380: 159-162 [Medline].
17. Jaffe, E. A., R. L. Nachtmann, C. G. Becker, and C. R. Minick. 1973. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins: identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J. Clin. Invest. 52: 2745-2756 .
18. Vedder, N. B., B. W. Fouty, and R. K. Winn. 1989. Role of neutrophils in generalized reperfusion injury associated with resuscitation from shock. Surgery 106: 509-516 [Medline].
19. Mulligan, M. S., C. W. Smith, and D. C. Anderson. 1993. Role of leukocyte adhesion molecules in complement-induced lung injury. J. Immunol. 150: 2401-2408 [Abstract].
20. Bernard, G. R.. 1999. Research in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome: are we changing course? Crit. Care Med. 27: 434-436 [Medline].
21. McCuskey, R. S., R. Urbaschek, and B. Urbaschek. 1996. The microcirculation during endotoxemia. Cardiovasc. Res. 32: 752-763 [Medline].
22. Benedict, C. R., and J. A. Rose. 1992. Arterial norepinephrine changes in patients with septic shock. Circ. Shock 38: 165-172 [Medline].
23. Bergmann, M., A. Gornikiewicz, T. Sauter, E. Waldmann, T. Weber, M. Mittlbock, E. Roth, and R. Fugger. 1999. Attenuation of catecholamine-induced immunosuppression in whole blood from patients with sepsis. Shock 12: 421-427 [Medline].
24. Uusaro, A., and J. A. Russell. 2000. Could anti-inflammatory actions of catecholamines explain the possible beneficial effects of supranormal oxygen delivery in critically ill surgical patients? Intensive Care Med. 26: 299-304 [Medline].
25.
Fortenberry, J D.,
A. R. Huber, and
M. L. Owens.
1997.
Inotropes inhibit
endothelial cell surface adhesion molecules induced by interleukin 1
.
Crit. Care Med.
25:
303-308
[Medline].
26. Agarwal, S. K., and G. D. Marshall. 2000. Beta-adrenergic modulation of human type-1/type-2 cytokine balance. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 105(1, Pt. 1):91-96.
27. Kumar, R., A. K. Agarwal, and P. K. Seth. 1995. Free-radical-generated neurotoxity of 6-hydroxydopamine. J. Neurochem. 64: 1703-1707 [Medline].
28.
Graham, D..
1978.
Oxidative pathways for catecholamines in the genesis of
neuromelanin and cytotoxic quinones.
Mol. Pharmacol.
14:
633-638
29. Gabbay, M., M. Tauber, S. Porat, and R. Simantow. 1996. Selective role of glutathione in protecting human neuronal cells from dopamine-induced apoptosis. Neuropharmacology 35: 571-575 [Medline].
30. Halliwell, B.. 1992. Reactive oxygen species and the central nervous system. J. Neurochem. 59: 1609-1623 [Medline].
31. Maker, H. S., C. Weiss, D. J. Silides, and G. Cohen. 1981. Coupling of dopamine oxidation (monoamine oxidase activity) to glutathione oxidation via the generation of hydrogen peroxide in rat brain homogenates. J. Neurochem. 36: 589-593 [Medline].
32.
Schayer, R. W.,
R. L. Smiley, and
E. H. Kaplan.
1952.
The metabolism of
epinephrine containing isotopic carbon II.
J. Biol. Chem.
198:
545-549
33. Vindis, C., M. H. Seguelas, S. Lanier, A. Parini, and C. Cambon. 2001. Dopamine induces ERK activation in renal epithelial cells through H2O2 produced by monoamine oxidase. Kidney Int. 59: 76-86 [Medline].
34.
Lum, H., and
K. A. Roebuck.
2001.
Oxidant stress and endothelial cell dysfunction.
Am J. Physiol. Cell Physiol
280:
C719-C741
35. Cook, J. A., D. A. Wink, and V. Blount. 1996. Role of antioxidants in the nitric oxide-elicited inhibition of dopamine uptake in cultured mesecephalic neurons: insights into potential mechanisms of nitric oxide-mediated neurotoxity. Neurochem. Int 28: 609-617 [Medline].
36. Berman, S. B., M. J. Zigmond, and T. G. Hastings. 1996. Modification of dopamine transport function: effect of reactive species and dopamine. J. Neurochem. 67: 593-600 [Medline].
37.
Kokura, S.,
R. E. Wolf,
T. Yoshikawa,
D. N. Granger, and
T. Y Aw.
1999.
Molecular mechanisms of neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion induced by
redox inbalance.
Circ. Res.
84:
516-524
38. Buttke, T. M., and P. A. Sandstrom. 1994. Oxidative stress as a mediator of apoptosis. Immunol. Today 15: 7-10 [Medline].
39. Maines, M. D.. 1997. The heme oxygenase system: a regulator of second messenger gases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37: 517-554 [Medline].
40.
Murry, C. E.,
R. B. Jennings, and
K. A. Reimer.
1986.
Preconditioning with
ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium.
Circulation
74:
1124-1136
41.
Zahler, S.,
Ch. Kupatt, and
B. F. Becker.
2000.
Endothelial preconditioning
by transient oxidative stress reduces inflammatory responses of cultured
endothelial cells to TNF-
.
FASEB J.
14:
555-564
42.
Gornikiewicz, A.,
T. Sauter,
C. Brostjan,
B. Schmierer,
R. Függer,
E. Roth,
F. Mühlbacher, and
M. Bergmann.
2000.
Catecholamines up-regulate lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 production in human microvascular endothelial cells.
FASEB J.
14:
1093-1100
43. Järnberg, P. O., L. Bengtsson, J. Ekstrand, and B. Hamberger. 1981. Dopamine infusion in man: plasma catecholamine levels and pharmacokinetics. Acta Anaesth. Scand. 25: 328-331 [Medline].
44.
Christman, J. W.,
R. T. Sadikot, and
T. S. Blackwell.
2000.
The role of Nuclear Factor-B in pulmonary diseases.
Chest
117:
1482-1487
45. Christman, J. W., L. H. Lancaster, and T. S. Blackwell. 1998. Nuclear factor kappa B: a pivotal role in the systemic response syndrome and new target for therapy. Intensive Care Med. 24: 1131-1138 [Medline].
46.
Lavrovsky, Y.,
M. L. Schwatzman,
R. D. Levere,
A. Kappas, and
N. G. Abraham.
1994.
Identification of binding sites for the transcription factors
NF-kappaB and AP-1 in the promotor region of the human heme oxygenase 1gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:
5987-5991
47. Otterbein, L. E., F. H. Bach, J. Alam, M. Soares, H. T. Lu, M Wysk, R. J. Davis, R. A. Flavall, and A. M. K. Choi. 2000. Carbon monoxide has anti-inflammatory effects involving the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Nat. Med. 6: 422-428 [Medline].
48. Berger, S. P., M. Hunger, B. A. Yard, P. Schnuelle, and F. J. Van der Woude. 2000. Dopamine induces the expression of heme oxygenase-1 by human endothelial cells in vitro. Kidney Int. 58: 2314-2319 [Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Dalmas, M. S. Scicchitano, Y. Chen, J. Kane, R. Mirabile, L. W. Schwartz, H. C. Thomas, and R. W. Boyce Transcriptional Profiling of Laser Capture Microdissected Rat Arterial Elements: Fenoldopam-induced Vascular Toxicity as a Model System Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2008; 36(3): 496 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Tephly and A. B. Carter Constitutive NADPH oxidase and increased mitochondrial respiratory chain activity regulate chemokine gene expression Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): L1143 - L1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Quinton, S. Nelson, P. Zhang, D. M. Boe, K. I. Happel, W. Pan, and G. J. Bagby Selective transport of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant from the lung to the blood facilitates pulmonary neutrophil recruitment Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): L465 - L472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |