help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karamsetty, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klinger, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karamsetty, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klinger, J. R.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., Volume 26, Number 1, January 2002 1-5

PERSPECTIVE
NO: More Than Just a Vasodilator in Lung Transplantation

Mallik R. Karamsetty and James R. Klinger

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence; and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island

Since the discovery of nitric oxide (NO) in biologic systems a scant 15 years ago, an unprecedented number of studies have explored the role of this molecule in the regulation of the pulmonary circulation. Although numerous models have been employed to study the role of NO in the lung, studies examining the effect of NO on the donor lung provide a unique opportunity to better understand the importance of this molecule in maintaining pulmonary vascular homeostasis. It is hard to imagine a worse injury for the lung to endure than removal from the donor, storage on ice for many hours, and eventual transplantation in the recipient. The donor lung usually receives the majority of the pulmonary blood flow and ventilation immediately after transplantation. This is true even with single lung transplantation, because the native lung that remains is often diseased. The result can be severe ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury that is often made worse by the high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) that is needed to oxygenate the patient. Under these circumstances, depletion of any factors important in normal homeostasis of the pulmonary circulation can greatly affect the overall survival and function of the donor lung. Previous studies have demonstrated that NO and cGMP levels fall rapidly in the donor lung immediately after harvest (1). Administration of NO or NO donors at the time of lung harvest can greatly improve function and survival of the lung graft (1). Recent studies exploring the mechanism of this prophylactic effect, such as the one by Minamoto and coworkers in this issue of AJRCMB, are beginning to illuminate the important role that NO has in maintaining normal function in the injured lung.

Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Rejection of Lung Graft

Although the mechanisms responsible for early dysfunction and rejection of lung allografts are not yet fully understood, there are several events that occur during lung transplantation that are likely to be responsible. These include an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, increased sequestration of polymorphonucelar leukocytes (PMNs), platelet activation, enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and increased release of inflammatory cytokines. This is accompanied by increased expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) (5), a marked decrease in endothelial derived NO production, and lower intracellular cGMP levels (1). At the same time, there is increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and apoptosis of pulmonary vascular endothelial and epithelial cells (6). The importance of each of these abnormalities and their relationship with each other is not completely known.

Reactive Oxygen Species

Reperfusion and ventilation of the previously ischemic donor graft with oxygenated blood and air leads to production of ROS such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and the hydroxyl radical. Activated PMNs, alveolar macrophages, and increased iron-generated oxidative stress contribute to increased ROS production (7). Production of ROS is further increased by the high FiO2 that is often needed to maintain oxygenation in the immediate posttransplant period. Donor lung grafts also have a significant depletion of glutathione, an endogenous scavenger of ROS. Thus, their ability to withstand repetitive ROS-mediated injury during episodes of lung rejection and infection is decreased (11). In addition to direct tissue injury, ROS cause pulmonary vasoconstriction and inactivate NO, thus contributing to endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arteries (12). Administration of ROS scavengers, such as superoxide dismutase, or inhibitors of xanthine oxidase, a ROS producing enzyme, restore endothelial-NO mediated pulmonary vasodilation in pulmonary arteries isolated from left lung autotransplants (13). Similarly, pretreatment with ROS scavengers or antioxidants has been shown to enhance lung preservation and graft function (8, 15).

Inflammatory Mediators

Sequestration and activation of macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils is increased in allografts during acute rejection (12, 16). These inflammatory cells produce inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha  (TNF-alpha ) (19, 20), which in turn increase the expression of iNOS in the ischemic setting (21). In contrast to the beneficial effects of constitutive eNOS expression in the pulmonary vascular endothelium, activation of iNOS expression in PMNs and alveolar macrophages is associated with increased cell killing and contributes to inflammation during acute graft rejection (22). Increased expression of iNOS has been shown to correlate directly with serum nitrite/nitrate levels in transplanted lung and the concentration of NO in exhaled air has been shown to correlate with the severity of acute lung rejection (23). Treatment with the iNOS inhibitor, aminoguanidine, reduces serum nitrite/nitrate levels, improves gas exchange, and ameliorates acute rejection of the donor graft (22, 24, 25). In addition to increasing expression of iNOS, sequestration of PMNs in the lung leads to generation of thromboxane and contributes to pulmonary vasoconstriction (26).

Apoptosis

Apoptosis of pneumocytes is an early event after lung reperfusion that increases in a time-dependent manner and likely contributes to graft dysfunction (27). The percentage of necrotic cells has been shown to correlate inversely with post-transplant graft function (27). Local ischemia may trigger apoptosis in the lung allograft. In one study, the number of apoptotic cells increased with the length of cold preservation time (28).

Endothelin-1

ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide with mitogenic properties that is produced by vascular endothelial cells. Its expression is often increased in response to hypoxia and acute inflammation. Expression of ET-1 and endothelin converting enzyme are increased in donor lungs during acute lung rejection and ET-1 expression returns to control levels at later stages of rejection (29). Protein levels of ET-1 in the plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of the recipient increase soon after transplantation of the lung allograft and decline to control levels one week after transplantation (30). The histologic grade of acute graft rejection has been shown to correlate closely with ET-1 levels on allograft biopsy specimens (31). In addition, the pulmonary vascular proliferative responses to ET-1 and vasoconstrictor responses to ETB-receptor antagonists are enhanced in donor lungs that develop acute rejection (32). Thus, it appears that ET-1 contributes to acute and chronic pathologic changes seen in graft rejection. Inhibiting the synthesis and antagonizing the effects of ET-1 may lead to improved graft function and survival. ET-1 receptor antagonists given to donors before lung harvest and during reperfusion have been found to improve pulmonary vascular resistance, arterial oxygenation and graft function (33). In addition, ET-1 inhibitors also appear to improve graft function by suppressing iNOS expression and apoptosis (33). Stammberger and colleagues (36) found that combined donor and recipient treatment with an ET-1 antagonist and a platelet activating factor (PAF) antagonist results in superior posttransplant graft function and survival compared with either agent alone, suggesting a synergistic role of ET-1 and PAF in the mediation of reperfusion injury.

Nitric Oxide

It is now well-appreciated that the constitutive expression of endogenous NO by the pulmonary vascular endothelium plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis of many aspects of the pulmonary circulation, including modulation of pulmonary vascular tone, maintenance of an intact pulmonary capillary membrane, and inhibition of platelet aggregation and leukocyte adhesion. Most of these effects are mediated by intracellular cGMP and cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) (1). Previous studies have shown that endogenous NO and cGMP levels fall precipitously in the donor lung immediately after reperfusion (1). Furthermore, expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is decreased in lung allografts during acute rejection (23). Consequently, endothelium-dependent NO mediated pulmonary vasodilation in response to various agonists, including acetylcholine and calcium ionophore, is impaired in pulmonary arteries isolated from dysfunctional lung grafts (13). The lack of normal NO production by the pulmonary vascular endothelium is at least partly responsible for the increase in pulmonary vascular resistance in the lung graft. Many studies have demonstrated that administration of NO to the donor lung by various strategies such as adenovirus-mediated eNOS gene transfer (37), early perfusion of the lung graft with NO donors, inhaled NO or essential cofactors for eNOS activity, such as tetrahydrobiopterin, ameliorate I-R injury and improve graft function (1, 4, 16, 38).

Originally, much of the beneficial effect of NO administration was attributed to its acute vasodilator properties and its ability to improve gas exchange by reducing intrapulmonary shunt. However, subsequent studies found that administration of NO to the donor lung is effective even when given well in advance of transplantation. In 1997, Fujino and coworkers (37) reported the beneficial effects of iNO given at the time of graft harvest. Supplementing the preservation solution with cGMP analog has also been shown to improve graft function and improve recipient survival (1). These observations suggest that acute improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange at the time of transplantation are not the only mechanisms by which NO improves graft function. Indeed, the uses of other vasodilators such as hydralazine have not been found to be effective in improving lung graft function despite achieving similar degrees of pulmonary vasodilation (45). Therefore, it is likely that other biologic properties of NO are involved.

Recent studies have shown that NO inhibits adhesion of PMNs to pulmonary artery endothelial cells before and after reperfusion, reduces the sequestration of PMNs into the transplanted lung, and attenuates subsequent tissue injury (46). Early administration of NO or NO donors attenuates the oxidative stress of I-R injury by inhibiting both graft neutrophil and platelet sequestration and activation (3, 45, 46). Again, timing of treatment with NO appears to be critical, because some studies have found that treatment with nitroglycerin (NTG) during flush/preservation, but not during reperfusion, inhibits neutrophil accumulation in the transplanted lung (47).

The other mechanism by which NO may improve graft function is by inhibiting the synthesis of ET-1. NO and cGMP are inhibitors of ET-1 production and counteract its vascular effects (48, 49). Administration of NO donors such as molsidomine (50) reduce the pulmonary expression of ET-1 induced by hypoxia. Overexpression of eNOS reduces pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary pressor responses to ET-1 (51). However, the ability of NO to reduce ET-1 expression in lung grafts has not previously been demonstrated. In this issue, Minamoto and coworkers (52), found marked improvement in graft function when the donor lung was flushed with preservation fluid containing the NO donor NTG at the time of harvest in an isogenic rat model of lung transplantation. No improvement was found when the same dose of NTG was given immediately after transplantation into the recipient. Early administration of NTG was associated with a significant reduction in ET-1 expression. Administration of an ET-1 receptor blocker also improved graft function, but not to the same degree as NTG. Although these findings suggest that other mechanisms are involved, they offer strong support for the hypothesis that NO improves graft function by inhibiting ET-1 expression and help explain why early administration of NO to lung grafts may be essential for improved function.

The mechanisms responsible for inducing injury in lung allografts and the role of NO in mitigating these events are summarized in Figure 1. Harvest and cold storage results in ischemia of the donor lung. Reperfusion at the time of transplant results in decreased eNOS expression, depletion of NO and cGMP, and a myriad of injuries that lead to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, increased levels of ROS, cytokines, and ET-1 expression. These, in turn, contribute to pulmonary hypertension, platelet aggregation, and pulmonary recruitment and sequestration of PMNs, which contribute to lung injury and apoptosis. Administration of exogenous NO replaces depleted levels of endogenous NO in the donor lung, which not only improves vascular resistance and gas exchange, but also acts to break the cycle of increased production of the other mediators of lung injury.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Mechanisms of injury to the donor graft in lung transplantation and the inhibitory effect of exogenous NO on these events. See text for explanation.

    Future Implications

Lung transplantation is the ultimate treatment for many patients with progressive lung disease. Unfortunately, much of the success that has been obtained with transplantation of other solid organs has yet to be realized with lung transplantation. One-year survival rates for lung grafts and their recipients remain lower than those for transplantation of any other solid organ. Reperfusion injury in the immediate post-transplantation period occurs in approximately 1 in 5 patients (53, 54). At the same time, the high prevalence of acute lung injury from aspiration, neurogenic pulmonary edema, and ARDS in donors of vital organs greatly limit the number of lungs that are capable of being used. It has been estimated that less than 20% of donors have lungs that are suitable for transplantation. In 1998, 485 patients died on the lung transplant waiting list because of inadequate supply of donor lungs (55). One approach that would greatly increase the number of suitable donor lungs is the use of lungs obtained from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD). The use of NO donors in the preservation fluid of lungs harvested from NHBD has greatly improved the function of these grafts in animal studies and may allow the use of NHBD for human transplantation as well.

Future studies exploring the mechanisms by which NO ameliorates injury to donor grafts may facilitate the development of better methods of preserving lung allograft and improving graft function after transplantation. At the same time, these studies are likely to shed new light on the complex interactions between NO and other vasoactive, mitogenic, and inflammatory substances such as ROS, cytokines, and ET-1 that mediate I-R injury in the lung. As important as NO appears to be in maintaining normal function in native lung, its role may prove to be even greater in preventing injury and dysfunction in the transplanted lung.

    Footnotes

Address correspondence to: James R. Klinger, M.D., Division of Pulmonary, Sleep, and Critical Care Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903. E-mail: James_Klinger{at}brown.edu

(Received in original form November 7, 2001).

Abbreviations: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, BALF; endothelin-1, ET-1; fraction of inspired oxygen, FiO2; inducible NO synthase, iNOS; nitric oxide, NO; platelet activating factor, PAF; polymorphonuclear leukocytes, PMN; reactive oxygen species, ROS; tumor necrosis factor alpha , TNF-alpha .
    References

1. Pinsky, D. J., Y. Naka, N. C. Chowdhury, H. Liao, M. C. Oz, R. E. Michler, E. Kubaszewski, T. Malinski, and D. M. Stern. 1994. The nitric oxide/cyclic GMP pathway in organ transplantation: critical role in successful lung preservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 12086-12090 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

2. Bhabra, M. S., D. N. Hopkinson, T. E. Shaw, and T. L. Hooper. 1997. Low-dose nitric oxide inhalation during initial reperfusion enhances rat lung graft function. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 63: 339-344 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

3. Sunose, Y., I. Takeyoshi, S. Ohwada, S. Iwazaki, M. Aiba, N. Tomizawa, H. Tsutsumi, N. Oriuchi, K. Matsumoto, and Y. Morishita. 2000. The effect of FK409-a nitric oxide donor-on canine lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant 19: 298-309 [Medline].

4. Yamashita, M., R. A. Schmid, K. Ando, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson. 1996. Nitroprusside ameliorates lung allograft reperfusion injury. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 62:791-796. [see Discussion]

5. Schersten, H., T. Hedner, C. G. McGregor, V. M. Miller, G. Martensson, G. C. Riise, and F. N. Nilsson. 1996. Increased levels of endothelin-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with lung allografts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 111: 253-258 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Szabolcs, M. J., S. Ravalli, O. Minanov, R. R. Sciacca, R. E. Michler, and P. J. Cannon. 1998. Apoptosis and increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in human allograft rejection. Transplantation 65: 804-812 [Medline].

7. Behr, J., K. Maier, B. Braun, M. Schwaiblmair, and C. Vogelmeier. 2000. Evidence for oxidative stress in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung and heart-lung transplantation. The Munich Lung Transplant Group. Transplantation 69: 1856-1860 [Medline].

8. Liu, C. J., M. Ueda, S. Kosaka, T. Hirata, H. Yokomise, K. Inui, S. Hitomi, and H. Wada. 1996. A newly developed solution enhances thirty-hour preservation in a canine lung transplantation model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 112: 569-576 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Reid, D., G. Snell, C. Ward, R. Krishnaswamy, R. Ward, L. Zheng, T. Williams, and H. Walters. 2001. Iron overload and nitric oxide-derived oxidative stress following lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant 20: 840-849 [Medline].

10. Shiraishi, T., A. Kuroiwa, T. Shirakusa, K. Kawahara, S. Yoneda, K. Kitano, K. Okabayashi, and A. Iwasaki. 1997. Free radical-mediated tissue injury in acute lung allograft rejection and the effect of superoxide dismutase. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 64: 821-825 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

11. Baz, M. A., V. F. Tapson, V. L. Roggli, P. Van Trigt, and C. A. Piantadosi. 1996. Glutathione depletion in epithelial lining fluid of lung allograft patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 153: 742-746 [Abstract].

12. Cale, A. R., J. A. Katzmann, H. D. Tazelaar, V. M. Miller, and C. G. McGregor. 1993. Activation of polymorphonuclear leukocyte oxygen radical production during acute lung rejection in dogs: inhibition by an antiadhesion molecule monoclonal antibody. J. Heart Lung Transplant 12:948- 954. [see Discussion]

13. Seki, S., N. A. Flavahan, N. G. Smedira, and P. A. Murray. 1999. Superoxide anion scavengers restore NO-mediated pulmonary vasodilation after lung transplantation. Am. J. Physiol. 276: H42-H46 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

14. Wiklund, L., V. M. Miller, H. D. Tazelaar, and C. G. McGregor. 1997. Effects of mononuclear cells on pulmonary arteries from rejecting transplanted lungs. Am. J. Physiol. 272: L379-L384 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

15. Demertzis, S., M. Scherer, F. Langer, A. Dwenger, B. Hausen, and H. J. Schafers. 2000. Ascorbic acid for amelioration of reperfusion injury in a lung autotransplantation model in sheep. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 70: 1684-1689 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Bacha, E. A., P. Herve, S. Murakami, A. Chapelier, G. M. Mazmanian, V. de Montpreville, H. Detruit, J. M. Libert, and P. Dartevelle. 1996. Lasting beneficial effect of short-term inhaled nitric oxide on graft function after lung transplantation. Paris-Sud University Lung Transplantation Group. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 112: 590-598 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

17. Cale, A. R., F. Ricagna, L. Wiklund, C. G. McGregor, and V. M. Miller. 1994. Mononuclear cells from dogs with acute lung allograft rejection cause contraction of pulmonary arteries. Circulation 90: 952-958 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

18. Ross, S. D., C. G. Tribble, J. R. Gaughen, Jr., K. S. Shockey, P. E. Parrino, and I. L. Kron. 1999. Reduced neutrophil infiltration protects against lung reperfusion injury after transplantation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 67:1428-1433. [see Discussion]

19. Kayano, K., K. Toda, Y. Naka, K. Okada, M. C. Oz, and D. J. Pinsky. 1999. Superior protection in orthotopic rat lung transplantation with cyclic adenosine monophosphate and nitroglycerin-containing preservation solution. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 118: 135-144 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

20. Meldrum, D. R., B. D. Shames, X. Meng, D. A. Fullerton, R. C. McIntyre Jr., F. L. Grover, and A. H. Harken. 1998. Nitric oxide downregulates lung macrophage inflammatory cytokine production. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 66: 313-317 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

21. Liu, M., L. Tremblay, S. D. Cassivi, X. H. Bai, E. Mourgeon, A. F. Pierre, A. S. Slutsky, M. Post, and S. Keshavjee. 2000. Alterations of nitric oxide synthase expression and activity during rat lung transplantation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 278: L1071-L1081 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

22. Worrall, N. K., C. H. Boasquevisque, M. D. Botney, T. P. Misko, P. M. Sullivan, J. H. Ritter, T. B. Ferguson Jr., and G. A. Patterson. 1997. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates functional and histological changes of acute lung allograft rejection. Transplantation 63: 1095-1101 [Medline].

23. Wang, X., D. A. Lewis, H. K. Kim, H. D. Tazelaar, Y. S. Park, C. G. McGregor, and V. M. Miller. 1998. Alterations in mRNA for inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase and plasma nitric oxide with rejection and/or infection of allotransplanted lungs. Transplantation 66: 567-572 [Medline].

24. Shiraishi, T., B. Chen, K. Okabayashi, S. Yoneda, K. Ando, A. Iwasaki, K. Kawahara, and T. Shirakusa. 1997. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase prolongs rat lung allograft survival. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 45: 78-82 [Medline].

25. Shiraishi, T., S. R. DeMeester, N. K. Worrall, J. H. Ritter, T. P. Misko, T. B. Ferguson, Jr., J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson. 1995. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates rat lung allograft rejection. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 110:1449-1459. [see Discussion]

26. Collins, B. J., M. G. Blum, R. E. Parker, A. C. Chang, K. S. Blair, G. L. Zorn III, B. W. Christman, and R. N. Pierson III.. 2001. Thromboxane mediates pulmonary hypertension and lung inflammation during hyperacute lung rejection. J. Appl. Physiol. 90: 2257-2268 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

27. Hansen, P. R., A. M. Holm, U. G. Svendsen, P. S. Olsen, and C. B. Andersen. 1999. Apoptosis in acute pulmonary allograft rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. Apmis 107: 529-533 . [Medline]

28. Fischer, S., A. A. Maclean, M. Liu, J. A. Cardella, A. S. Slutsky, M. Suga, J. F. Moreira, and S. Keshavjee. 2000. Dynamic changes in apoptotic and necrotic cell death correlate with severity of ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162: 1932-1939 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

29. McDermott, C. D., H. Shennib, and A. Giaid. 1998. Immunohistochemical localization of endothelin-1 and endothelin-converting enzyme-1 in rat lung allografts. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 31: S27-S30 .

30. Shennib, H., C. Serrick, D. Saleh, R. Adoumie, D. J. Stewart, and A. Giaid. 1995. Alterations in bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma endothelin-1 levels early after lung transplantation. Transplantation 59: 994-998 [Medline].

31. Aarnio, P., T. Ikonen, F. Fyhrquist, E. Taskinen, and A. Harjula. 1998. Raised endothelin content in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid during lung allograft rejection in pigs. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 32: 301-304 . [Medline]

32. Ricagna, F., V. M. Miller, H. D. Tazelaar, and C. G. McGregor. 1996. Endothelin-1 and cell proliferation in lung organ cultures: implications for lung allografts. Transplantation 62: 1492-1498 [Medline].

33. Shaw, M. J., H. Shennib, N. Bousette, E. H. Ohlstein, and A. Giaid. 2001. Effect of endothelin receptor antagonist on lung allograft apoptosis and NOSII expression. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 72: 386-390 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

34. Shaw, M. J., H. Shennib, L. Tayara, E. Ohlstein, and A. Giaid. 2000. Endothelin receptor antagonist SB209670 decreases lung allograft apoptosis and improves lung graft function after prolonged ischemia. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 36: S209-S211 . [Medline]

35. Watanabe, T., J. Hayasi, A. Isogai, S. Shimizu, T. Takara, T. Asakura, H. Moriya, S. Kubota, and S. Yamaguchi. 2000. Effects of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist TAK-044 on pulmonary injury in discordant xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc. 32: 911-912 [Medline].

36. Stammberger, U., G. L. Carboni, S. Hillinger, D. Schneiter, W. Weder, and R. A. Schmid. 1999. Combined treatment with endothelin- and PAF-antagonists reduces posttransplant lung ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Heart Lung Transplant 18: 862-868 [Medline].

37. Jeppsson, A., C. Pellegrini, T. O'Brien, V. M. Miller, H. D. Tazelaar, C. B. Taner, and C. G. McGregor. 2000. Gene transfer of endothelial nitric oxide synthase to pulmonary allografts: impact on acute rejection. Transpl. Int. 13: S591-S596 .

38. Fujino, S., I. Nagahiro, A. N. Triantafillou, C. H. Boasquevisque, M. Yano, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson. 1997. Inhaled nitric oxide at the time of harvest improves early lung allograft function. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 63: 1383-1389. [see Discussion]

39. Fujino, S., I. Nagahiro, M. Yamashita, M. Yano, R. A. Schmid, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson. 1997. Preharvest nitroprusside flush improves posttransplantation lung function. J. Heart Lung Transplant 16: 1073-1080 [Medline].

40. King, R. C., O. A. Binns, R. C. Kanithanon, J. T. Cope, R. L. Chun, K. S. Shockey, C. G. Tribble, and I. L. Kron. 1997. Low-dose sodium nitroprusside reduces pulmonary reperfusion injury. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 63: 1398-1404 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

41. Naka, Y., N. C. Chowdhury, M. C. Oz, C. R. Smith, O. J. Yano, R. E. Michler, D. M. Stern, and D. J. Pinsky. 1995. Nitroglycerin maintains graft vascular homeostasis and enhances preservation in an orthotopic rat lung transplant model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 109:206-210. [see Discussion]

42. Schmid, R. A., S. Hillinger, R. Walter, A. Zollinger, U. Stammberger, R. Speich, A. Schaffner, W. Weder, and G. Schoedon. 1999. The nitric oxide synthase cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin reduces allograft ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 118: 726-732 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

43. Takeyoshi, I., Y. Otani, D. Yoshinari, Y. Kawashima, S. Ohwada, K. Matsumoto, and Y. Morishita. 2000. Beneficial effects of novel nitric oxide donor (FK409) on pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. J. Heart Lung Transplant 19: 185-192 [Medline].

44. Vainikka, T., L. Heikkila, S. Kukkonen, and H. J. Toivonen. 2001. L-Arginine in lung graft preservation and reperfusion. J. Heart Lung Transplant 20: 559-567 [Medline].

45. Naka, Y., N. C. Chowdhury, H. Liao, D. K. Roy, M. C. Oz, R. E. Michler, and D. J. Pinsky. 1995. Enhanced preservation of orthotopically transplanted rat lungs by nitroglycerin but not hydralazine: requirement for graft vascular homeostasis beyond harvest vasodilation. Circ. Res. 76: 900-906 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

46. Bacha, E. A., H. Sellak, S. Murakami, G. M. Mazmanian, H. Detruit, V. de Montpreville, A. R. Chapelier, J. M. Libert, P. G. Dartevelle, and P. Herve. 1997. Inhaled nitric oxide attenuates reperfusion injury in non-heartbeating-donor lung transplantation. Paris-Sud University Lung Transplantation Group. Transplantation 63: 1380-1386 [Medline].

47. Murakami, S., E. A. Bacha, G. M. Mazmanian, H. Detruit, A. Chapelier, P. Dartevelle, and P. Herve. 1997. Effects of various timings and concentrations of inhaled nitric oxide in lung ischemia-reperfusion: the Paris-Sud University Lung Transplantation Group. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156: 454-458 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

48. Boulanger, C., and T. F. Luscher. 1990. Release of endothelin from the porcine aorta: inhibition by endothelium-derived nitric oxide. J. Clin. Invest. 85: 587-590 .

49. Kourembanas, S., L. P. McQuillan, G. K. Leung, and D. V. Faller. 1993. Nitric oxide regulates the expression of vasoconstrictors and growth factors by vascular endothelium under both normoxia and hypoxia. J. Clin. Invest. 92: 99-104 .

50. Blumberg, F. C., K. Wolf, P. Sandner, C. Lorenz, G. A. Riegger, and M. Pfeifer. 2001. The NO donor molsidomine reduces endothelin-1 gene expression in chronic hypoxic rat lungs. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 280: L258-L263 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

51. Champion, H. C., T. J. Bivalacqua, F. M. D'Souza, L. A. Ortiz, J. R. Jeter, K. Toyoda, D. D. Heistad, A. L. Hyman, and P. J. Kadowitz. 1999. Gene transfer of endothelial nitric oxide synthase to the lung of the mouse in vivo: effect on agonist-induced and flow-mediated vascular responses. Circ. Res. 84: 1422-1432 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

52. Minamoto, K., D. J. Pinsky, T. Fujita, and Y. Naka. 2002. Timing of nitric oxide donor supplementation determines endothelin-1 regulation and quality of lung preservation for transplantation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 26: 14-21 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

53. Christie, J. D., J. E. Bavaria, H. I. Palevsky, L. Litzky, N. P. Blumenthal, L. R. Kaiser, and R. M. Kotloff. 1998. Primary graft failure following lung transplantation. Chest 114: 51-60 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

54. King, R. C., O. A. Binns, F. Rodriguez, R. C. Kanithanon, T. M. Daniel, W. D. Spotnitz, C. G. Tribble, and I. L. Kron. 2000. Reperfusion injury significantly impacts clinical outcome after pulmonary transplantation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 69: 1681-1685 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

55. UNOS. 1989-1998. The US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: Transplant Data 1989-1998. UNOS, Richmond, VA; and the US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Filaire, E. Fadel, B. Decante, F. Seccatore, G.-M. Mazmanian, and P. Herve
Inhaled nitric oxide does not prevent postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema in pigs
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 770 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. S Rea, N. T Ansani, and A. L Seybert
Role of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Adult Heart or Lung Transplant Recipients
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2005; 39(5): 913 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. M. Levine and L. F. Angel
Primary Graft Failure: Who Is at Risk?
Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1190 - 1192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. O. Meade, J. T. Granton, A. Matte-Martyn, K. McRae, B. Weaver, P. Cripps, and S. H. Keshavjee
A Randomized Trial of Inhaled Nitric Oxide to Prevent Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury after Lung Transplantation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2003; 167(11): 1483 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
B. B. Vargaftig and M. Singer
Leukotrienes Mediate Murine Bronchopulmonary Hyperreactivity, Inflammation, and Part of Mucosal Metaplasia and Tissue Injury Induced by Recombinant Murine Interleukin-13
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2003; 28(4): 410 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
L. W. Gonzales, S. H. Guttentag, K. C. Wade, A. D. Postle, and P. L. Ballard
Differentiation of human pulmonary type II cells in vitro by glucocorticoid plus cAMP
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): L940 - L951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. Hind, J. Corcoran, and M. Maden
Pre- and Postnatal Lung Development, Maturation, and Plasticity: Temporal/spatial expression of retinoid binding proteins and RAR isoforms in the postnatal lung
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): L468 - L476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karamsetty, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klinger, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karamsetty, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Klinger, J. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society.