| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of hypoxia on the regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS) 2 expression were examined in cultured
rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (EC). EC did not
express NOS 2 mRNA or protein when exposed to normoxia
or hypoxia unless they were pretreated with interleukin (IL)-1
and/or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
for 24 h. Induction of
NOS 2 by IL-1
+TNF-
was significantly attenuated by concomitant exposure of EC to hypoxia or treatment of EC with
antioxidants such as tiron, diphenyliodonium, and catalase,
suggesting that NOS 2 expression is dependent on the production of reactive oxygen species. Degradation of I
B and activation of NF-
B, which were both induced by treatment of EC
with cytokines, were not altered when the cells were exposed to hypoxia, suggesting that the modulation of NOS 2 expression by hypoxia is unrelated to NF-
B activation. Following
stimulation with IL-1
+TNF-
for 24 h, incubation of EC in
normoxia resulted in a progressive decline in NOS 2 expression and a calculated half-life of approximately 6 h for NOS 2 mRNA. Hypoxia significantly prolonged the half-life of NOS 2 mRNA (17 h, P < 0.05 versus normoxic EC). The half-life of
NOS 2 mRNA was also prolonged by actinomycin D treatment
(19.5 and 29.5 h for normoxic and hypoxic EC, respectively), suggesting that transcription of an RNA destabilizing factor or RNAse contributes to NOS 2 mRNA degradation. In EC transiently transfected with the rat NOS 2 promoter, hypoxia and
the combination of IL-1
+TNF-
independently increased
promoter activity 2.2- and 3-fold, respectively. As opposed to
the attenuating effect that hypoxia had on IL-1
+TNF-
-
dependent induction of NOS 2 gene expression, the concomitant treatment with IL-1
+TNF-
and hypoxia synergistically
increased NOS 2 promoter activity 17.6-fold. Taken together,
these results suggest that hypoxia alone does not induce NOS
2 expression in cultured pulmonary microvascular EC, but may
modulate cytokine induction of this enzyme at pretranscriptional, transcriptional, and posttranscriptional levels.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitric oxide (NO) is synthesized by a family of enzymes known as the nitric oxide synthases (NOS) and is involved in various physiologic functions, such as regulation of vascular tone, inflammation, and inhibition of platelet aggregation and smooth muscle cell proliferation (1). Two isoforms of NOS, NOS 1 and NOS 3, are constitutively expressed in neuronal and endothelial cells, respectively. The inducible isoform of NOS (i.e., iNOS or NOS 2) is present in many cell types but has been examined mainly in inflammatory cells such as the macrophage. As opposed to NOS 1 and NOS 3, expression of NOS 2 is induced by inflammatory cytokines, and its activity is not calcium dependent. The primary role of NOS 2 in macrophages appears to be as a defense mechanism against microorganisms (1). Several groups have reported expression of NOS 2 in cells other than macrophages, such as vascular smooth muscle cells (2), glomerular mesangial cells (3), microglia (4), and endothelial cells (EC) (5). However, the most important physiologic source of NO in the latter cell type is believed to be the endothelial isoform of NOS (eNOS or NOS 3), which is responsible for regulation of vascular tone (1). NO may also be important in the pathogenesis of some disease processes. For example, the severe hypotension seen in septic shock is believed to be due to an overproduction of NO from NOS 2 expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells in response to circulating cytokines (6). Whether NOS 2 expressed in EC is an additional source of NO in sepsis is unknown.
The present study was conducted to examine the expression of NOS 2 in rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells and to determine the potential regulation of this gene by hypoxia. The results indicate that hypoxia alone does not induce NOS 2 gene expression in cultured pulmonary microvascular EC, but may modulate cytokine induction of this gene at various pretranscriptional, transcriptional, and posttranscriptional levels.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents
RPMI 1640, penicillin G potassium, streptomycin, amphotericin B,
Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT), RNase inhibitor, and Taq polymerase were obtained from
Gibco (Grand Island, NY). 2,3-diaminonaphtalene (DAN), N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl esther (L-NAME), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris),
pyronin Y, and dithiothreitol were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
RNAzol B was purchased from Tel-Test (Friensworth, TX).
Oligo-d(T)12-18 and pSL1190 were obtained from Pharmacia
(Piscataway, NJ). Tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) and interleukin (IL)-1
were obtained from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA).
NuSieve and SeaKem were obtained from FMC Bioproducts (Rockland, ME). Goat anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase, nitro-block, and CSPD were purchased from Tropix (Bedford, MA).
Isolation and Culture of Cells
Rat pulmonary microvascular EC were a gift from Dr. Una Ryan (Avant Immunotherapeutics, Needham, MA). These cells have been identified as EC by their cobblestone morphology under light and electron microscopy and by the presence of factor VIII antigen (7). EC, which were passaged up to ten times and cultured as previously described (8), maintained their phenotype and endo-thelial characteristics. Culture medium, which consisted of RPMI with 10% fetal calf serum, was changed every other day. Cell counts were monitored routinely by Coulter counter for each control and experimental group. Cell integrity was assessed by morphological examination of the cells under phase-contrast microscopy and trypan blue exclusion as previously described (8, 9).
Exposure of Cells to Oxygen
Cells were placed in humidified airtight incubation chambers (Billups-Rothenberg, Del Mar, CA) and gassed with the desired concentration of O2 (3 or 20% O2), 5% CO2, and balance N2. The chambers were maintained in a New Brunswick incubator (New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) for the duration of exposure. The percentages of O2 in the chambers were routinely checked using an oxygen analyzer (LB-2; Beckman, Fullerton, CA) and were consistently within 2% of the desired tension. The percentages of CO2 were also monitored (OM-11; Beckman) and were consistently around 4-6%.
Fluorometric Measurement of Nitrite/Nitrate
The cellular release of nitrite in culture medium was determined using a method described by Misko and colleagues (10), with minor
modifications (11). This method is based on the conversion, in the
presence of nitrite and in acidic condition, of nonfluorescentDAN to
the fluorescent compound 1-(H)-naphtotriazole (NT). Briefly, during exposure of EC to the experimental condition (cytokines and/or
O2 tension), the cells were incubated in fresh phenol red-free medium devoid of fetal bovine serum, with or without the NOS inhibitor N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl esther (L-NAME, 300 µM). At the
end of incubation, 850 µl of medium was removed, treated with nitrate reductase to convert nitrate into nitrite, and then mixed with 100 µl DAN (0.05 mg/ml in 0.62 M HCl). The mixture was protected from light and incubated for 10 min at 20°C, after which the reaction was terminated by adding 50 µl of 2.8 N NaOH. Fluorescence of NT
was measured using excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 and
450 nm, respectively. NO production is estimated as the L-NAME- inhibitable portion of the total nitrite production of the cells.
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction for Rat NOS 2
RNA isolation and reverse transcription.Total cell RNA was obtained from cultured rat pulmonary microvascular EC using RNAzol B according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was serially diluted with diethyl-pyrocarbonate treated water containing 1 unit per µl RNase inhibitor and 3 mM dithiothreitol. RNA was primed with 660 pmol oligo-d(T)12-18 and reverse transcribed by MMLV-RT in a total volume of 30 µl containing 460 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate for 1 h at 37°C as described previously (12). A control was prepared by subjecting RNA to the reverse transcription procedure without MMLV-RT. After reverse transcription, samples were heated at 95°C for 5 min to denature the MMLV-RT and then stored at -40°C until polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Rat NOS 2 internal standard preparation.A region of plasmid pSL 1190 was amplified and simultaneously extended by PCR with primers such that the fragment had sequences at both ends that were fully homologous with sequences from rat NOS 2 cDNA (13). The resulting fragment was purified on Geneclean (Bio 101, La Jolla, CA) and served as the internal standard (IS) for rat NOS 2. When a mixture of this IS and rat cDNA is subjected to PCR with primers 5'-CTGGGT CAAAGAGGCT-3' (forward) and 5'-ACCCAAA CACCAAG GTCATGC-3' (reverse), a 478-bp fragment is generated from the IS along with a 611-bp fragment of rat NOS 2 cDNA.
PCR. A master PCR reagent mixture was prepared such that each 25 µl contained 0.4 µM of each primer and 52 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate in 15 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin (pH 8.5) buffer. A constant amount of cDNA was added to the master mix of PCR primers and buffer, and 25 µl aliquots were placed in several tubes. Subsequently, variable amounts of IS were added to each 25-µl PCR reagent mix. Samples were overlaid with light mineral oil and held at 80°C for hot-start PCR. Taq polymerase (1.25 U) in 2 µl water was added to each sample by underlaying, and PCR was performed for 35 cycles with 1 min, 94°C denaturation; 1 min, 60°C annealing; and 1 min, 72°C extension. The last cycle extension was for 10 min. Primer pairs presumably span introns because genomic DNA was not amplified. Controls prepared from RNA without MMLV-RT were negative.
Quantification. After PCR, 10-µl sample aliquots were electrophoresed on 2% NuSieve/1% SeaKem agarose in Tris/acetic acid/ EDTA buffer for 2 h at 80 V, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed. Densitometry was done with a Millipore Densitometer with Visage v4.6p software (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Because the NOS 2 target is larger than the mutant, target optical density is multiplied by a correction factor of 0.78 to normalize the value before calculating the molar ratio of 473 bp mutant to 611 bp target. For absolute quantification, a fixed amount of cDNA was added to the master mix prior to aliquoting. Subsequently, the IS is serially diluted and added to each sample. When PCR is performed with a fixed amount of cDNA and serial dilutions of IS per sample, optical densities for NOS 2 and IS are plotted versus copies of IS to assess amplification as a function of IS input. The equivalence point, where target and IS copies are equal, is determined from a plot of IS/NOS 2 ratio versus copies of IS. This value was divided by 0.4 to compensate for the less than 100% reverse transcription efficiency, which was presumed to be 40% as determined from the manufacturer's literature and elsewhere (14). Also, the value was multiplied by 2 to compensate for differential amplification during the first PCR cycle where the single-stranded cDNA target is rendered double stranded, whereas the double-stranded IS is amplified geometrically. Corrected values are reported as copies of NOS 2 mRNA per µg of total cellular RNA. To control for potential loading differences, a second quantitative PCR was performed using tubulin and a tubulin internal standard for each sample. Final results were expressed as copies of NOS 2 mRNA per 107 copies of tubulin mRNA.
For some experiments, a semiquantitative PCR method was used. PCR was conducted as described previously, with the exception of mixing the samples of cDNA with a fixed amount of internal standard. The same process was followed for tubulin, which was used for control of input. The ratio of NOS 2 over IS was used to compare changes in steady-state levels of NOS 2 mRNA between different groups.
Western Blot Analysis
Sample preparation.Cell lysates were obtained by incubating confluent endothelial cells in 100-mm Petri dishes with 1 ml of boiling cell lysis buffer containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1.0 mM sodium vanadate, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4). Lysates were then boiled for 5 min and sonicated for 5 s. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation (14,000 × g for 2 min), and the supernatant was used for analysis. Protein measurements of the supernatant (samples) were made using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Samples corresponding to equal amounts of total protein (~ 300 µg) were diluted (1:5 by volume of buffer) in electrophoresis sample buffer (0.2 M EDTA, 40 mM dithiothreitol, 6% SDS, 0.06 mg/ml pyronin [pH 6.8]) and boiled for 3-5 min to denature protein. Samples were then subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 6% slab gel in a model SE-600 apparatus (Hoefer Scientific, San Francisco, CA) (15).
Immunoblotting. After electrophoresis, gel proteins were electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membrane (Tropifluor; Tropix, Bedford, MA or Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA) at 0.5 amperes for 2 1/2 hours in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, 20% MeOH) (16). The membrane was then placed into
blocking buffer containing 5% nonfat dry milk in 10 mM Tris
(pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at ambient
temperature. A 1/1,000 and 1/2,500 dilution of polyclonal I
B
and NOS 2 antibody (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA), respectively, in blocking buffer was incubated
with the membrane overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation. After
washing, the membrane was exposed to the enzyme conjugate
goat anti-rabbit IgG- alkaline phosphatase, diluted in blocking
buffer for 90 min at ambient temperature. Following washing, detection with the alkaline phosphatase substrate CSPD and film
exposure were performed.
Transient Transfections and Luciferase Assay
The 637-bp fragment of the rat NOS 2 gene, which includes 497 bp of the 5'-flanking region as well as 139 of exon 1, inserted into pGL3/ basic (Promega, Madison, WI), upstream of the promoterless luciferase gene (pINOSGEN2) was kindly provided by K-F. Beck (Klinicum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (17). Preliminary experiments of transient transfections of rat pulmonary microvascular EC with lipofectamine (Lipofectamin, Gibco) have shown adequate transfection efficiency (70% as determined by a galactosidase assay) of this cell type. The cells are split 16 h before transfection. Plasmids pINOSGEN2 (1 µg) and CMV promoter-driven Renilla luciferase reporter gene (concentration of 1:40 with construct) were cotransfected with lipofectin (2-10 µl/35 mm Petri dish) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fresh medium was added 4 h after transfection, and the cells were allowed to recover from the procedure for 24 to 48 h before being subjected to the experimental protocol. A dual luciferase assay (Promega Luciferase System Kit; Promega, Madison, WI) was performed at the end of the procedure according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Nuclear Extract Preparation
EC were grown to confluency in 60-mm Petri dishes in RPMI,
10% fetal bovine serum in the presence or absence of interleukin (IL)-1
(1 ng/ml), or IL-1
(1 ng/ml)+TNF-
(20 ng/ml). The
cells were exposed to normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia (3% O2) for
4 h and then collected in 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4)
and centrifuged for 10 s. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.4 ml 10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl,
0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM AEBSF, 8 µM aprotinin, 0.5 mM
bestatin, 0.15 mM E-64, 0.2 mM leupeptin, and 0.1 mM pepstatin
A and kept on ice for 10 min. The samples were vortexed and
centrifuged for 10 s, and nuclear pellets were resuspended in 50 µl
20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.9), 20% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM AEBSF,
8 µM aprotinin, 0.5 mM bestatin, 0.15 mM E-64, 0.2 mM leupeptin, and 0.1 mM pepstatin A, and incubated on ice for 1 h. Finally,
samples were centrifuged for 2 min at 13,000 × g, and supernatants were stored in 10-µl aliquots at
80°C.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Equal amounts of nuclear proteins from different samples were
incubated with a commercial oligonucleotide probe for a NF-
B p65 binding site (Gelshift Plus; Geneka Biotechnology, Montreal, PQ, Canada). The electrophoretic mobility shift assay was
performed, with the specific and the mutant oligonucleotides, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The oligonucleotides were radiolabeled by incubation with [
-32P] ATP and T4
polynucleotide kinase as previously described (18). The 32P labeled
probe was then incubated with nuclear extract proteins (0.2 mg/ml)
with or without 10-fold excess unlabeled probe to test for specificity
of binding as described (18). After incubation for 30 min at room
temperature, samples (5 µg protein/well) were run on a 5% TBE
polyacrylamide gel (12.5 V/cm). The gel was then dried and used
for autoradiography or exposed on a PhosphorImager screen
(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) for quantitation.
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were repeated at least three times with adequate
sample numbers for each experimental and control condition (n =
3). Values are shown as means ± SD. Unpaired Student's t tests
were used for experiments in which two groups were being compared. For all studies involving more than two groups, Fisher's multiple comparison test (Statview 512+; Brainpower, Calabasa, CA) was used to determine significant changes occurring between and within control cells and counterparts exposed to experimental conditions. Significance in all cases was assumed at P < 0.05.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytokine-Dependent Induction of NOS 2 Expression and Activity in EC
Unstimulated rat pulmonary microvascular EC exposed to
normoxia did not express NOS 2 mRNA or protein as determined by PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively
(Figures 1A and 1B). However, treatment of these cells for
24 h with IL-1
(1 ng/ml), TNF-
(20 ng/ml), or a combination
of these cytokines, resulted in the induction of NOS 2 mRNA
(Figure 1A). Using semiquantitative PCR as described in
MATERIALS AND METHODS, NOS 2 mRNA expression was greatest after stimulation with the combination of IL-1
and TNF-
(Figure 1A). This combination was therefore
used in all subsequent experiments. As shown in Figure 1B,
NOS 2 protein expression was also strongly induced by the
combination of IL-1
and TNF-
.
|
The effect of cytokine stimulation on EC NOS 2 enzymatic activity was evaluated by measuring NO generation,
as determined by the L-NAME inhibitable portion of the
nitrite/nitrate accumulation in the extracellular media, during a 24-h treatment with the combination of IL-1
(1 ng/ml)
and TNF-
(20 ng/ml). As compared with unstimulated EC from which NO release was undetectable, stimulation
of EC with the cytokine combination for 24 h resulted in a
significant increase in NO release into the cell media (Figure 2, control bar).
|
Lack of Induction of NOS 2 Gene Expression by Hypoxia Alone
Hypoxia alone has been shown to activate the murine
NOS 2 promoter (19) and to upregulate expression of the
enzyme in lung tissue in vivo (20). However, except for
studies involving transfection of the NOS 2 promoter (20),
the effect of hypoxia on NOS 2 gene expression in isolated
EC has never been examined. To evaluate whether acute
hypoxia alone induces the expression of NOS 2 in isolated
cells, confluent EC were exposed to hypoxia (3% O2) or normoxia (20% O2) for 6-24 h. Hypoxia did not induce the
expression of EC NOS 2 at either mRNA or protein levels
as determined by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively (data not shown). To evaluate whether acute
hypoxia modulates the induction of EC NOS 2 by IL-1
and TNF-
, confluent EC were stimulated with the cytokine
combination for 24 h and simultaneously exposed to either hypoxia (3% O2) or normoxia (20% O2). As compared with
EC exposed to normoxia, exposure of EC to hypoxia resulted
in a significant attenuation of the induction of NOS 2 mRNA
(Figure 3) and protein (Figure 4, C/N and C/H for normoxia
and hypoxia, respectively) by the cytokine combination.
|
|
Modulation of Cytokine-Induced NOS 2 Expression by Hypoxia
Effect of hypoxia on NOS 2 mRNA. To assess the effects
of hypoxia on preexisting NOS 2 mRNA and protein, EC
were first treated with IL-1
and TNF-
for 24 h to obtain
maximal expression of NOS 2. The cells were then exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for an additional 6-24 h.
Following stimulation with IL-1
+TNF-
, incubation of
EC in cytokine-free media and normoxia resulted in a
progressive decay of NOS 2 mRNA (Figure 5A) with a
calculated half-life for NOS 2 mRNA of ~ 6.2 h (95% CI
of 5-8 h). This decay in NOS 2 mRNA was significantly
prolonged upon exposure of the cells to hypoxia (Figure
5A), with a calculated mRNA half-life of 17 h (95% CI of
11-35 h, P < 0.05 versus NOS 2 mRNA half-life from normoxic cells). To further explore NOS 2 mRNA decay in
normoxia and hypoxia, EC were treated as above with IL-1
and TNF-
for 24 h, then washed and exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for an additional 6-24 h in the presence
of actinomycin D (1 µg/ml). As shown in Figure 5B, actinomycin treatment resulted in significant stabilization of
NOS 2 mRNA rather than the expected increased decay
with such treatment. The calculated half-lives for NOS 2 mRNA were 19.5 and 29.5 h, for cells exposed to normoxia
and hypoxia, respectively (Figure 5B).
|
Effect of hypoxia on NOS 2 protein and enzymatic activity. As a consequence of increased mRNA stability, NOS 2 mRNA level from EC exposed to hypoxia was 2.6-fold
higher than that of EC maintained in normoxia at 24 h of oxygen exposure (Figure 6; P < 0.01). Consistent with this finding, NOS 2 protein level was greater after 24 h of exposure in
cells exposed to hypoxia compared with normoxia (Figure 4;
C
N and C
H for normoxia and hypoxia, respectively).
|
Cellular NOS 2 enzymatic activity was assessed by the L-NAME inhibitable portion of the total nitrite release into the cell media, as explained in MATERIALS AND METHODS. As shown in Figure 2, there was no difference in enzymatic activity in EC exposed to normoxia for 24 h following the initial cytokine stimulation compared with control stimulated EC (125 ± 19% of control, P = 0.32). However, exposure to hypoxia reduced NO release to 20 ± 11% of control (P = 0.0002 versus control release; Figure 3). Therefore, despite an increase in NOS 2 mRNA and protein levels (Figures 4 and 5), NOS 2 activity of EC maintained in hypoxia was significantly reduced, a finding consistent with the requirement of oxygen as a cofactor for NOS 2 activity. However, brief reoxygenation of these hypoxic cells for 4 h resulted in a significant increase in NO release as compared with their counterparts maintained in normoxia (170 ± 8% versus 100 ± 32%, respectively, P = 0.0004; Figure 7), consistent with the higher content of NOS 2 mRNA and protein in these cells.
|
Taken together, these studies indicate that (i) hypoxia alone does not stimulate NOS 2 expression, (ii) hypoxia and actinomycin D treatment stabilize preformed NOS 2 mRNA and protein, (iii) hypoxia decreases NOS 2 activity, and (iv) reoxygenation of previously hypoxic EC upregulates NOS 2 activity in cytokine-stimulated cells.
Effect of Antioxidants on the Cytokine-Dependent Induction of EC NOS 2 mRNA
We speculated that downregulation of NOS 2 gene expression in cytokine-stimulated EC concomitantly exposed to
hypoxia could be related to decreased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by EC (21, 22). Therefore, the
possibility that the induction of NOS 2 by IL-1
and TNF-
might be dependent on the generation of ROS was first tested.
EC were treated with the combination of IL-1
and TNF-
for 24 h in the absence or presence of several antioxidants.
Treatment included tiron (1 mM); a scavenger of superoxide, allopurinol (100 µM), which inhibits the superoxide-producing enzyme xanthine oxidase; catalase (3,000 U/ml),
which detoxifies hydrogen peroxide; or diphenyliodonium
(1 µM), a nonspecific inhibitor of flavoprotein enzymes
such as the NAD(P)H oxidase enzyme. As shown in Figure
8, all antioxidants, with the exception of allopurinol, attenuated the induction of NOS 2 mRNA by the cytokine combination. These experiments support the hypothesis that cytokine induction of NOS 2 occurs through ROS.
|
Activation of NF-
B by Cytokines
The induction of NOS 2 by certain cytokines occurs through
degradation of I
B and activation of NF-
B (23). This process may be dependent on the generation of ROS (24, 25).
Because the latter may be decreased in hypoxia (21, 22), we
tested the possibility that hypoxia might alter either the degradation of I
B or the activation of NF-
B. EC were treated
with IL-1
(1 ng/ml) and TNF-
(20 ng/ml) and exposed to
hypoxia or normoxia for periods of 5 min to 4 h. After exposure, Western blot analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift
assays were performed to assess I
B degradation and NF-
B
activation, respectively. Hypoxia did not alter the degradation of I
B, which was evident 15 min after EC were exposed
to cytokines (Figure 9A). As shown in Figure 9B, there was
no NF-
B-DNA binding in unstimulated EC exposed to normoxia or hypoxia. Binding of NF-
B-DNA was detected at
30 min (results not shown) and maximal at 1 h (Figure 9B) in
normoxic EC treated with IL-1
and TNF-
, with no alteration when the cells were exposed to hypoxia. The binding
was specific for the labeled oligonucleotide containing the
NF-
B site because excess unlabeled oligonucleotide (cold
probe) competed with the labeled probe, whereas a mutant oligonucleotide did not (Figure 9B). These studies suggest
that cytokine induction of NOS 2 occurs through NF-
B activation, a phenomenon that is not prevented by hypoxia.
|
Regulation of the 5'-Flanking Region of the Rat NOS 2 Gene by Hypoxia
To determine whether the attenuation in the cytokine-dependent induction of NOS 2 expression by hypoxia might
be associated with similar changes in the activity of the
NOS 2 promoter, transient transfection of rat pulmonary
microvascular EC was performed using piNOSGEN2, as
detailed in MATERIALS AND METHODS. This DNA fragment contains 497 bp of the 5'-flanking region of the rat NOS 2 gene linked to a luciferase reporter gene. When compared
with control transfected EC (unstimulated cells exposed to
normoxia), treatment of cells with either the combination
of IL-1
and TNF-
for 24 h or hypoxia for 24 h resulted
in a 3- (P < 0.001) and 2.2-fold (P < 0.001) increase, respectively, in NOS 2 promoter activity (Figure 10). Concomitant treatment of transfected EC with the cytokine combination and hypoxia for 24 h resulted in a 17.6-fold
increase in NOS 2 promoter activity (P < 0.001).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypoxia has been shown to modulate the expression of several endothelial genes, including vascular endothelial growth factor (26), endothelin-1 (27), platelet-derived growth factor (28), and the endothelial isoform of NOS (i.e., NOS 3) (11, 29). Using in situ hybridization, Palmer and colleagues recently demonstrated that hypoxia induced type 2 NOS mRNA in pulmonary endothelial as well as vascular smooth muscle cells in a chronic hypoxia model of pulmonary hypertension (20). Upregulation of NOS 2 in this model appears to occur through induction of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1. Furthermore, using transient transfection of EC, the authors demonstrated a 2.7-fold increase in NOS 2 promoter activity in hypoxic transfected cells as compared with nonhypoxic controls. This increase was completely abrogated with deletion or mutation of the HIF-1 binding site, further supporting an essential role for HIF-1 in the hypoxic regulation of NOS 2 transcription in pulmonary endothelium. However, whereas increased NOS 2 mRNA transcription was demonstrated in the hypoxic lung in that study, evidence of increased transcription of NOS 2 in cultured EC in response to hypoxia was not provided beyond the aforementioned effect on the promoter activity (20).
The present study was undertaken to specifically test the hypothesis that hypoxia might regulate NOS 2 expression in cultured endothelial cells. Also, it became apparent from preliminary experiments on the regulation of NOS 2 that mRNA expression, which was upregulated in the rat lung in response to acute hypoxia (i.e., 24 h), was undetectable when cultured pulmonary EC were exposed to hypoxia for up to 48 h (30). Furthermore, it appears that gene regulation by hypoxia, in general, might differ between in vivo and in vitro systems. For example, whereas Le Cras and colleagues demonstrated an upregulation of endothelial cell NOS (i.e., NOS 3) in response to hypoxia in the rat lung (29), we (11) and others (31) have shown a downregulation of the expression of the same gene in cultured EC. Therefore, we reasoned that, in relation to the regulation of NOS 2, factors other than the direct effect of hypoxia might be operative in vivo, perhaps explaining the discrepancies observed between in vitro and in vivo systems.
The present data indicate that exposure of cultured pulmonary microvascular EC to hypoxia alone does not result in the induction of NOS 2 mRNA or protein expression. This is consistent with the observation by Melillo and colleagues that hypoxia alone does not induce the expression of NOS 2 mRNA in isolated murine macrophages (19). However, like murine brain endothelial cells (5), pulmonary microvascular EC respond to stimulation by cytokines with strong induction of NOS 2 mRNA, protein, and activity. To our knowledge, this is the first report of induction of NOS 2 expression in cultured pulmonary microvascular EC. As is the case for other cell types, such as the macrophage (1) or the smooth muscle cell (2), stimulation by more than one cytokine appears to have synergistic effects.
Whereas hypoxia alone did not induce NOS 2 expression in cultured pulmonary microvascular EC, this factor
had significant modulating effects on the regulation of the
NOS gene. Concomitant exposure of EC to hypoxia and
IL-1
/TNF-
resulted in significant attenuation of NOS 2 mRNA, protein expression, and activity, as compared with
normoxic cytokine-stimulated EC. Several lines of evidence indicate that decreased production of ROS in hypoxia could have been responsible for this modulating effect of hypoxia on gene expression. We have previously
shown that hypoxia significantly inhibits the intra- and extracellular generation of ROS from bovine pulmonary artery EC (21, 22). A similar decrease in ROS production was
found in rat pulmonary microvascular EC exposed to hypoxia (data not shown). Furthermore, the present experiments demonstrate that treatment with various antioxidants reduces the induction of NOS 2 mRNA expression
by IL-1
and TNF-
, suggesting that ROS are necessary
signals for this induction. Finally, it is known that induction of NOS 2 expression is dependent on activation of
transcription factors such as NF-
B (17). Because the latter is redox sensitive (25, 32), we postulated that hypoxia
might alter NF-
B activation. We first demonstrated that
the combination of IL-1
and TNF-
caused the degradation of I
B followed by activation of NF-
B binding. However, contrary to our expectations, exposure of cytokine-stimulated EC to hypoxia did not prevent the degradation of I
B or alter the binding of NF-
B, suggesting that transcriptional modulation of NOS 2 by hypoxia involves
mechanisms other than NF-
B activation. In this respect,
our results differ from the attenuation of IL-1
-dependent induction of NOS 2 and activation of NF-
B observed
in cardiac myocytes exposed to hypoxia for 48 h (33).
Hypoxia was found to have other important modulating
effects on NOS 2 transcriptional and post-translational expression. Hypoxic exposure of EC transfected with the murine NOS 2 promoter resulted in a 2-fold increase in activity
of this promoter, a finding comparable to the 2.7-fold increase described by Palmer and colleagues in similar experiments (20). This effect most likely involves activation and
binding of HIF-1, as elegantly demonstrated by these investigators (20). However, as shown in the present study, activation of the promoter by hypoxia does not result in transcription and translation of the message in cultured EC.
Such a discrepancy between activation of the promoter and
lack of increase of NOS mRNA may be explained by the
lack of inclusion of all regulatory elements in the promoter used for the present experiments. It is also possible that synthesis of an active lung NOS 2 protein may occur in vivo
secondary to other parallel events such as activation of cytokines by hypoxia. Hypoxia alone has been shown to stimulate cytokine production (such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF) from
human tissues (34, 35). Also, increased IL-1 and IL-6 expression in response to hypoxia has been demonstrated in
cardiac myocytes (36), human umbilical vein EC (37), and
alveolar macrophages (38). Another interaction between
hypoxia and cytokines that is relevant to the present study is
the finding that IL-1
and TNF-
strongly stimulate DNA binding of HIF-1 above and beyond the effect of hypoxia
alone on this interaction (39). It is noteworthy that, whereas
hypoxia and stimulation by IL-1
/TNF-
had independent
modest effects on NOS promoter activity (i.e., 2-fold increase) in the present study, the combination of these stimuli resulted in a significantly larger increase (i.e., 17.6-fold)
in that activity. A similar synergistic activation by hypoxia
and interferon-
has been demonstrated by Melillo and colleagues in transfected murine macrophages (19).
Finally, hypoxia was demonstrated to have posttranscriptional effects. As observed with other cell types exposed to cytokines, there was decay of NOS 2 after removal of IL-1
and TNF-
from the cell culture medium
in EC exposed to normoxia, resulting in a calculated NOS
2 mRNA half-life of 6 h. However, the decay in mRNA
and protein levels was significantly prolonged in hypoxia, resulting in higher mRNA and protein levels in cells maintained in hypoxia for 24 h after cytokine stimulation and a
significant increase in NOS 2 mRNA half-life (17 h). There
was significantly more release of NO from these cells after
reoxygenation compared with cells maintained in normoxia, consistent with the higher levels of NOS 2 protein
in the hypoxic cells. Because hypoxia does not induce
NOS 2 transcription in rat pulmonary microvascular EC,
the observed increased mRNA and protein expression,
conferred by exposure of the cells to hypoxia after initial
stimulation with cytokines, is likely due to stabilization of
NOS mRNA. We performed experiments with actinomycin D treatment to further assess NOS 2 stability. Actinomycin D treatment resulted in significant stabilization of
NOS 2 mRNA, with half-lives of 19.5 and 29.5 h for cells
exposed to normoxia and hypoxia, respectively. This effect
of a transcription inhibitor, although not entirely explained, is likely to be attributed to inhibition of a labile
NOS 2-specific RNAse, as previously suggested (40). It
appears that NOS 2 mRNA destabilization (e.g., after induction with cytokines) depends on several cis determinants such as the AU-rich element, which contains one or
more AUUUA motifs in the 3'-untranslated region (41). The
AU-rich element is a target for specific AU-binding factors
(42, 43), which confer stability to mRNA. One such factor
is AU-A, a 34-kD protein that is constitutively expressed and whose cytoplasmic content is increased following inhibition of transcription (44). Also of note is that hypoxia
has been shown to increase the stability of VEGF mRNA
through activation of another RNA-binding protein, namely
HuR (45). The latter has been demonstrated to confer stability to NOS 2 MRNA in response to cytokine induction
in human intestinal epithelial cells (43). Whether hypoxia
could prevent putative NOS mRNAse(s) or activate stabilizing factors, such as AU-A or HuR, was not addressed by the present study and remains speculative.
In summary, this study shows that NOS 2 is not expressed in unstimulated cultured pulmonary microvascular
EC. However, this gene can be induced in response to a
combination of IL-1
and TNF-
. Hypoxia appears to have
significant transcriptional (at the NOS 2 promoter level),
posttranscriptional (mRNA stabilization), and post-translational (NOS 2 activity) effects on the regulation of this
gene. On the basis of these results, we speculate that the
pulmonary microvascular EC may actively participate in
inflammatory processes and that tissue hypoxia may create
a favorable environment for prolonged NOS action.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Paul M. Hassoun, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, 750 Washington Street, NEMC 257 Boston, MA 02111. E-mail: phassoun{at}lifespan.org
(Received in original form January 24, 2001 and in revised form August 16, 2001).
Abbreviations: diaminonaphtalene, DAN; endothelial cell, EC; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA; hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF; interleukin, IL; inducible nitric oxide synthase, iNOS; internal standard, IS; N
-nitro-L
-arginine methyl esther, L-NAME; Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase, MMLV-RT; nitric oxide, NO; nitric oxide synthase, NOS;
1-(H)-naphtotriazole, NT; polymerase chain reaction, PCR; reactive oxygen
species, ROS; tumor necrosis factor, TNF; tumor necrosis factor-
, TNF-
.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by grants from the NIH (HL49441) (P.M.H.), American Lung Association (U.K.), and the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program (U.K.).
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Moncada, S., and
A. Higgs.
1993.
The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway.
N. Engl.
J. Med.
329:
2002-2012
2. Nakayama, D. K., D. A. Geller, C. J. Lowenstein, H. D. Chern, P. Davies, B. R. Pitt, R. L. Simmons, and T. R. Billiar. 1992. Cytokines and lipopolysaccharide induce nitric oxide synthase in cultured rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 7:471-476 (published erratum appears in Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1993;9:following 229).
3. Saura, M., S. Lopez, M. Rodriguez, Puyol, D. Rodriguez, Puyol, and S. Lamas. 1995. Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in rat mesangial cells and isolated glomeruli. Kidney Int. 47: 500-509 [Medline].
4.
Colasanti, M.,
T. Persichini,
M. Menegazzi,
S. Mariotto,
E. Giordano,
C. M. Caldarera,
V. Sogos,
G. M. Lauro, and
H. Suzuki.
1995.
Induction of nitric
oxide synthase mRNA expression: suppression by exogenous nitric oxide.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:
26731-26733
5. Gross, S. S., E. A. Jaffe, R. Levi, and R. G. Kilbourn. 1991. Cytokine-activated endothelial cells express an isotype of nitric oxide synthase which is tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent, calmodulin-independent and inhibited by arginine analogs with a rank-order of potency characteristic of activated macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 178: 823-829 [Medline].
6. Rees, D. D., S. Cellek, R. M. Palmer, and S. Moncada. 1990. Dexamethasone prevents the induction by endotoxin of a nitric oxide synthase and the associated effects on vascular tone: an insight into endotoxin shock. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 173: 541-547 [Medline].
7. Ryan, U. S., and J. W. Ryan. 1980. Angiotensin-converting enzyme: II. Pulmonary endothelial cells in culture. Environ. Health Perspect 35: 171-180 [Medline].
8.
Cote, C. G.,
F. S. Yu,
J. J. Zulueta,
R. J. Vosatka, and
P. M. Hassoun.
1996.
Regulation of intracellular xanthine oxidase by endothelial-derived nitric
oxide.
Am. J. Physiol.
271:
L869-L874
9.
Hassoun, P. M.,
F. S. Yu,
A. L. Shedd,
J. J. Zulueta,
V. J. Thannickal,
J. J. Lanzillo, and
B. L. Fanburg.
1994.
Regulation of endothelial cell xanthine
dehydrogenase xanthine oxidase gene expression by oxygen tension.
Am.
J. Physiol.
266:
L163-L171
10. Misko, T. P., R. J. Schilling, D. Salvemini, W. M. Moore, and M. G. Currie. 1993. A fluorometric assay for the measurement of nitrite in biological samples. Anal. Biochem. 214: 11-16 [Medline].
11. Liao, J. K., J. J. Zulueta, F. S. Yu, H. B. Peng, C. G. Cote, and P. M. Hassoun. 1995. Regulation of bovine endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase by oxygen. J. Clin. Invest 96: 2661-2666 .
12. Lanzillo, J. J.. 1991. Chemiluminescent nucleic acid detection with digoxigenin-labeled probes: a model system with probes for angiotensin converting enzyme which detect less than one attomole of target DNA. Anal. Biochem. 194: 45-53 [Medline].
13. Nunokawa, Y., N. Ishida, and S. Tanaka. 1993. Cloning of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 191: 89-94 [Medline].
14.
Bouaboula, M.,
P. Legoux,
B. Pessegue,
B. Delpech,
X. Dumont,
M. Piechaczyk,
P. Casellas, and
D. Shire.
1992.
Standardization of mRNA titration using a polymerase chain reaction method involving co-amplification with a multispecific internal control.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
21830-21838
15. Laemmli, U. K.. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685 [Medline].
16.
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and
J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of
proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and
some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:
4350-4354
17. Beck, K. F., and R. B. Sterzel. 1996. Cloning and sequencing of the proximal promoter of the rat iNOS gene: activation of NFkappaB is not sufficient for transcription of the iNOS gene in rat mesangial cells. FEBS Lett. 394: 263-267 [Medline].
18. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1999. DNA-Protein Interactions. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. V. B. Chanda, editor. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 12.1.1-12.2.7.
19.
Melillo, G.,
T. Musso,
A. Sica,
L. S. Taylor,
G. W. Cox, and
L. Varesio.
1995.
A hypoxia-responsive element mediates a novel pathway of activation of
the inducible nitric oxide synthase promoter.
J. Exp. Med.
182:
1683-1693
20.
Palmer, L. A.,
G. L. Semenza,
M. H. Stoler, and
R. A. Johns.
1998.
Hypoxia
induces type II NOS gene expression in pulmonary artery endothelial cells
via HIF-1.
Am. J. Physiol.
274:
L212-L219
21. Zulueta, J. J., F. S. Yu, I. A. Hertig, V. J. Thannickal, and P. M. Hassoun. 1995. Release of hydrogen peroxide in response to hypoxia-reoxygenation: role of an NAD(P)H oxidase-like enzyme in endothelial cell plasma membrane. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 12: 41-49 [Abstract].
22.
Zulueta, J. J.,
R. Sawhney,
F. S. Yu,
C. C. Cote, and
P. M. Hassoun.
1997.
Intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species in endothelial cells exposed to anoxia-reoxygenation.
Am. J. Physiol.
272:
L897-L902
23.
Xie, Q. W.,
Y. Kashiwabara, and
C. Nathan.
1994.
Role of transcription factor NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
4705-4708
24.
Barchowsky, A.,
S. R. Munro,
S. J. Morana,
M. P. Vincenti, and
M. Treadwell.
1995.
Oxidant-sensitive and phosphorylation-dependent activation of
NF-kappa B and AP-1 in endothelial cells.
Am. J. Physiol.
269:
L829-L836
25. Schreck, R., P. Rieber, and P. A. Baeuerle. 1991. Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor and HIV-1. Embo. J. 10: 2247-2258 [Medline].
26.
Levy, A. P.,
N. S. Levy,
S. Wegner, and
M. A. Goldberg.
1995.
Transcriptional
regulation of the rat vascular endothelial growth factor gene by hypoxia.
J.
Biol. Chem.
270:
13333-13340
27. Kourembanas, S., P. A. Marsden, L. P. McQuillan, and D. V. Faller. 1991. Hypoxia induces endothelin gene expression and secretion in cultured human endothelium. J. Clin. Invest. 88: 1054-1057 .
28. Kourembanas, S., R. L. Hannan, and D. V. Faller. 1990. Oxygen tension regulates the expression of the platelet-derived growth factor-B chain gene in human endothelial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 86: 670-674 .
29.
Le Cras, T. D.,
C. Xue,
A. Rengasamy, and
R. A. Johns.
1996.
Chronic hypoxia upregulates endothelial and inducible NO synthase gene and protein
expression in rat lung.
Am. J. Physiol.
270:
L164-L170
30. Zulueta, J. J., R. Sawhney, F. S. Yu, A. Kim, J. J. Lanzillo, and P. M. Hassoun. 1998. Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells by hypoxia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 157: A227 .
31. McQuillan, L. P., G. K. Leung, P. A. Marsden, S. K. Kostyk, and S. Kourembanas. 1994. Hypoxia inhibits expression of eNOS via transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. 267:H1921-H1927 (published errata appear in Am. J. Physiol. 1995;268 section H following table of contents and Am. J. Physiol. 1995;268 section H following table of contents).
32. Canty, T. G. Jr., E. M. Boyle Jr., A. Farr, E. N. Morgan, E. D. Verrier, and T. H. Pohlman. 1999. Oxidative stress induces NF-kappaB nuclear translocation without degradation of IkappaBalpha. Circulation 100: II361-II364 .
33.
Kacimi, R.,
C. S. Long, and
J. S. Karliner.
1997.
Chronic hypoxia modulates
the interleukin-1beta-stimulated inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway
in cardiac myocytes.
Circulation
96:
1937-1943
34. Klausen, T., N. V. Olsen, T. D. Poulsen, J. P. Richalet, and B. K. Pedersen. 1997. Hypoxemia increases serum interleukin-6 in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 480-482 .
35.
Benyo, D. F.,
T. M. Miles, and
K. P. Conrad.
1997.
Hypoxia stimulates cytokine production by villous explants from the human placenta.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
82:
1582-1588
36.
Yamauchi-Takihara, K.,
Y. Ihara,
A. Ogata,
K. Yoshizaki,
J. Azuma, and
T. Kishimoto.
1995.
Hypoxic stress induces cardiac myocyte-derived interleukin-6.
Circulation
91:
1520-1524
37. Shreeniwas, R., S. Koga, M. Karakurum, D. Pinsky, E. Kaiser, J. Brett, B. A. Wolitzky, C. Norton, J. Plocinski, W. Benjamin, D. K. Burns, A. Goldstein, and D. Stern. 1992. Hypoxia-mediated induction of endothelial cell interleukin-1 alpha: an autocrine mechanism promoting expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules on the vessel surface. J. Clin. Invest. 90: 2333-2339 .
38. Hempel, S. L., M. M. Monick, and G. W. Hunninghake. 1996. Effect of hypoxia on release of IL-1 and TNF by human alveolar macrophages. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 14: 170-176 [Abstract].
39.
Hellwig-Burgel, T.,
K. Rutkowski,
E. Metzen,
J. Fandrey, and
W. Jelkmann.
1999.
Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulate DNA
binding of hypoxia-inducible factor-1.
Blood
94:
1561-1567
40. Park, S. K., and S. Murphy. 1996. Nitric oxide synthase type II mRNA stability is translation- and transcription-dependent. J. Neurochem. 67: 1766-1769 [Medline].
41. Galea, E., D. J. Reis, and D. L. Feinstein. 1994. Cloning and expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase from rat astrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 37: 406-414 [Medline].
42.
Brewer, G..
1991.
An A + U-rich element RNA-binding factor regulates
c-myc mRNA stability in vitro.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:
2460-2466
43.
Rodriguez-Pascual, F.,
M. Hausding,
I. Ihrig-Biedert,
H. Furneaux,
A. P. Levy,
U. Forstermann, and
H. Kleinert.
2000.
Complex contribution of the
3'-untranslated region to the expressional regulation of the human inducible nitric-oxide synthase gene: involvement of the RNA-binding protein
HuR.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:
26040-26049
44.
Katz, D. A.,
N. G. Theodorakis,
D. W. Cleveland,
T. Lindsten, and
C. B. Thompson.
1994.
AU-A, an RNA-binding activity distinct from hnRNP
A1, is selective for AUUUA repeats and shuttles between the nucleus and
the cytoplasm.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:
238-246
45.
Levy, N. S.,
S. Chung,
H. Furneaux, and
A. P. Levy.
1998.
Hypoxic stabilization of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA by the RNA-binding
protein HuR.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:
6417-6423
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Robinson, J. E. Baumgardner, V. P. Good, and C. M. Otto Physiological and hypoxic O2 tensions rapidly regulate NO production by stimulated macrophages Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): C1079 - C1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Peng, R.-E. E. Abdulnour, S. Sammani, S.-F. Ma, E. J. Han, E. J. Hasan, R. Tuder, J. G. N. Garcia, and P. M. Hassoun Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Contributes to Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2005; 172(4): 470 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Agorreta, J. J. Zulueta, L. M. Montuenga, and M. Garayoa Adrenomedullin expression in a rat model of acute lung injury induced by hypoxia and LPS Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): L536 - L545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|