Published ahead of print on August 12, 2004, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2004-0025OC
© 2004 American Thoracic Society DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0025OC Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor1 Impairs Alveolar Epithelial Repair by Binding to VitronectinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center; and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan Address correspondence to: Thomas H. Sisson, M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, 6301 MSRB III, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0642. E-mail: tsisson{at}umich.edu
The pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis is thought to involve alveolar epithelial injury that, when successfully repaired, can limit subsequent scarring. The plasminogen system participates in this process with the balance between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) being a critical determinant of the extent of collagen accumulation that follows lung injury. Because the plasminogen system is known to influence the rate of migration of epithelial cells, including keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells, we hypothesized that the balance of uPA and PAI-1 would affect the efficiency of alveolar epithelial cell (AEC) wound repair. Using an in vitro model of AEC wounding, we show that the efficiency of repair is adversely affected by a deficiency in uPA or by the exogenous administration of PAI-1. By using PAI-1 variants and AEC from mice transgenically deficient in vitronectin (Vn), we demonstrate that the PAI-1 effect requires its Vn-binding activity. Furthermore, we have found that cell motility is enhanced by the availability of Vn in the matrix and that the AEC-Vn interaction is mediated, in part, by the vß1 integrin. The significant effect of uPA and PAI-1 on epithelial repair suggests a mechanism by which the plasminogen system may modulate pulmonary fibrosis.
Abbreviations: Ab, antibody AEC, alveolar epithelial cell Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, DMEM IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 PBS, phosphate-buffered saline SFM, serum-free media uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA/, mice transgenically deficient in uPA Vn, vitronectin Vn/, mice transgenically deficient in Vn WT, wild type
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an insidiously progressive alveolar scarring disorder associated with a high mortality. Current therapies primarily directed at suppressing inflammation have not successfully altered the course of this disease, and new treatment approaches are desperately needed. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of IPF is required to define novel therapeutic targets. Impaired or aberrant wound healing marked by the failure of epithelial cells to resurface the denuded alveolus has been proposed as a critical component in the pathogenesis of IPF (1). The importance of the epithelium is supported by the observation that active fibrosis occurs in areas of the alveolus where pneumocytes have been injured and/or lost (2). Furthermore, growth factors that stimulate epithelial cell migration and proliferation have been shown to reduce fibrosis in animal models, suggesting that improved epithelial regeneration is capable of limiting collagen deposition (3, 4). Alterations in the plasminogen activation system play a critical role in the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Patients with IPF and other diseases associated with lung scarring demonstrate impaired plasminogen activation in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid secondary to increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) (5). The bleomycin model of pulmonary fibrosis recapitulates the increased PAI-1 expression and the impairment in plasminogen activation that is characteristic of human fibrotic disorders. Preserving plasminogen activation in the lung through a targeted deletion of the PAI-1 gene, or through enhanced expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), has been shown to dramatically protect mice from bleomycin-induced mortality and lung scarring (6, 7). Conversely, accentuated impairment of plasminogen activation through PAI-1 overexpression leads to exuberant fibrosis after lung injury (6).
The mechanism by which the plasminogen system modulates pulmonary fibrosis remains unclear. However, prior studies have shown this proteolytic cascade to be involved in cutaneous wound healing, keratinocyte migration, and bronchial epithelial cell migration (810). In these studies, plasmin-mediated proteolysis was responsible for cutaneous wound repair and bronchial epithelial migration. Plasmin presumably facilitated these processes by allowing cells to digest extracellular matrix barriers and to modify their matrix footholds. The plasminogen system can also influence cell migration through mechanisms independent of plasmin-mediated proteolytic activity. Stefansson and colleagues demonstrated that PAI-1 can inhibit smooth muscle cell migration by interfering with integrin-mediated vitronectin (Vn) binding (9). Furthermore, PAI-1 has been shown to affect the adhesion of a variety of cell types, including HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells, by accelerating the turnover of matrix-binding proteins, including integrins and the urokinase receptor (11). Extrapolating from these studies and the mounting evidence that impaired alveolar epithelial restoration is a critical component of pulmonary fibrosis, we postulated that the plasminogen system influences lung scarring by altering alveolar epithelial repair. To investigate the role of the plasminogen system in alveolar epithelial wound healing, we have employed an in vitro model (12). In this model, alveolar epithelial cells (AECs) are grown to a confluent monolayer and then mechanically injured. After injury, the rate of repair has been shown to be dependent upon cell migration (13, 14). Because the balance of uPA and PAI-1 is correlated with both pulmonary fibrosis and the rate of wound repair in other tissues, we hypothesized that this balance would influence the efficiency of AEC healing. In this article, we demonstrate that the exogenous administration of PAI-1 or a deficiency of uPA hinders alveolar epithelial wound repair. Interestingly, the ability of PAI-1 to slow AEC migration does not depend on its antiproteolytic inhibition of plasminogen activation, but rather on its capacity to bind Vn. We also demonstrate that the presence of Vn in the wound matrix improves the efficiency of AEC wound repair. When PAI-1 adheres to Vn, it impairs cell motility, at least in part, by interfering with binding of the
Media and Reagents Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and DMEM:Ham's F12 (DMEM:F12 1:1) were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA). Cellgro Complete serum-free media (SFM) was purchased from Mediatech (Herndon, VA). We obtained fetal bovine serum and the peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G secondary antibody (Ab) from BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD). Rabbit anti-integrin v subunit polyclonal Ab and rabbit anti-human ß3 polyclonal Ab were acquired from Chemicon International, Inc. (Temecula, CA). Rat anti-mouse CD29 (ß1 integrin) was purchased from Research Diagnostics, Inc. (Flanders, NJ), and isotype-matched rat monoclonal immunoglobulin G2a was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Human multimeric Vn was purchased from Molecular Innovations, Inc. (Southfield, MI); human glu-plasminogen was purchased from American Diagnostica, Inc. (Greenwich, CT). Human plasma fibronectin and sodium orthovanadate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Protease inhibitors were obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). The DC Protein Assay Kit was obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Finally, the immunoblotting chemiluminescence detection reagent was purchased from Pierce (Rockford, IL).
PAI-1 Variants
Animals
Fibronectin Coating of 96-Well Plates
AEC Purification
Preparation of Murine Serum
A549 Cell Wounding Assay
Murine AEC Wounding Assay
Assessment of Wound Repair The wound areas were photographed with an inverted brightfield microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and images were captured with SPOT digital camera RT Slider using SPOT Advanced 3.0.4 image software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.). Pictures were taken immediately after wounding (Day 0) and then at 24 and 48 h (Day 1 and Day 2, respectively). Using NIH ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), the edge of the wound was traced and the area of the wound calculated. The percent healing on Day 1 and Day 2 was determined by dividing the measured wound area by the Day 0 wound area of the same monolayer.
Bleomycin Exposure
Hydroxyproline Assay
Statistical Analysis
Effect of PAI-1 and uPA on AEC Wound Healing The level of PAI-1 expression is known to influence the extent of fibrosis after lung injury. We hypothesized that one mechanism by which the plasminogen system modulates lung scarring is through its effects on repair of the alveolar epithelium. To investigate whether PAI-1 can inhibit the rate of alveolar epithelial healing, we added a stable variant, PAI-1 (V+P+), to the culture media of AEC monolayers at the time of wounding. In our initial studies, we used the lung-derived A549 epithelial cell line because it is well adapted to form confluent monolayers in tissue culture, and it expresses relevant components of the plasminogen system, including uPA, PAI-1, and the uPA receptor (23, 24). As shown in Figure 1A, the addition of PAI-1 (V+P+), as we hypothesized, slowed the A549 wound closure rate on both Days 1 and 2 after injury (Figure 1, P < 0.0001). The impaired healing did not appear to result from diminished cell viability because the PAI-1exposed cells continued to exclude trypan blue (data not shown). In addition, PAI-1 did not bring about cell detachment or changes in cellular morphology as viewed under phase-contrast microscopy. Because A549 cells are a tumor-derived cell line and may exhibit altered migratory behavior when compared with native AECs, we studied the effect of PAI-1 (V+P+) on the rate of wound healing of primary AECs isolated from C57BL/6 mice. As demonstrated in Figure 1B, exogenous PAI-1 also slowed the rate of primary AEC wound repair (P < 0.001).
After discovering that exogenous PAI-1inhibited AEC migration, we next wanted to investigate whether PAI-1 deficiency would accelerate wound healing. Primary AECs from PAI-1/ mice were isolated and compared with C57BL/6 AECs with respect to their rate of repair. Of note, prior studies have demonstrated that primary AECs express PAI-1 (23). As shown in Figure 2, an absence of PAI-1 in our culture system enhanced the healing efficiency (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the addition of exogenous PAI-1 (V+P+) to the PAI-1null cells slowed repair to a rate similar to that of WT cells (P < 0.001). Finally, to determine whether uPA influenced AEC migration, we wounded monolayers derived from mice deficient in this plasminogen activator. Figure 2 demonstrates that these cells migrate less efficiently than WT cells (P < 0.01). Furthermore, in a separate experiment, we found that the exogenous administration of uPA to A459 cells enhanced wound repair (data not shown).
Mechanism by Which PAI-1 Inhibits AEC Wound Healing PAI-1 has the potential to inhibit cell migration through several mechanisms. First, uPA-mediated plasminogen activation has been shown to facilitate cell migration, presumably through the proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix barriers and footholds (10). Thus, by blocking uPA-mediated proteolysis, PAI-1 could delay AEC wound closure. Second, PAI-1 has been shown to slow smooth muscle cell migration by blocking their ability to bind to Vn (9). To determine the mechanism by which PAI-1 impaired alveolar epithelial wound closure in our in vitro model system, we took advantage of two PAI-1 variants. The first variant, PAI-1 (VP+) maintains its antiproteolytic activity but demonstrates greatly reduced affinity for Vn when compared with WT PAI-1 (15). The second variant, PAI-1 (V+P), demonstrates normal binding to Vn, but has no antiproteolytic activity toward uPA or other proteases (16). In our initial experiments, we studied the effects of these variant inhibitors on A549 wound repair. PAI-1 (V+P) significantly slowed the A549 wound closure rate (P < 0.05), whereas the PAI-1 (VP+) had no effect (Figure 3A, P = NS). To confirm that these results were not specific to the A549 cell line, we compared the ability of the stable mutant, PAI-1 (V+P+), and the antiproteolytic mutant, PAI-1 (VP+), to inhibit C57BL/6 AEC wound healing. As demonstrated in Figure 3B, PAI-1 (V+P+), with its intact Vn binding activity, inhibited wound closure (P < 0.05), whereas the PAI-1 (VP+) had no effect (P = NS). To confirm that the lack of efficacy of PAI-1 (VP+) was not secondary to an insufficient quantity of plasminogen substrate in our culture system, exogenous plasminogen was added to the media after wounding in both A549 cells and WT murine AECs. This exogenous plasminogen did not influence wound closure rate in either cell type (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that the ability of PAI-1 to delay wound closure in our in vitro model requires its Vn-binding properties but not its antiproteolytic activity.
Effect of Vn on the PAI-1 (V+P)Mediated Inhibition of Alveolar Cell Healing The ability of PAI-1 (V+P) to slow wound repair suggests that AECs migrate more efficiently when bound to Vn. It is also possible that PAI-1 (V+P) impairs wound healing by disrupting the adherence of AECs to other extracellular matrix supports. To investigate whether the PAI-1induced slowing of wound closure requires Vn, we isolated cells from Vn/ mice and grew them to confluence in media with serum that also lacked Vn. We then assessed whether the stable mutant, PAI-1 (V+P+), with its intact Vn binding properties, would impair wound healing in the absence of Vn. Figure 4A demonstrates that PAI-1 (V+P+) had no effect on AEC migration in the absence of Vn (P = NS) and, as expected, the antiproteolytic variant, PAI-1 (VP+), continued to lack effect (P = NS). Furthermore, to confirm that the presence of Vn in the matrix enhances wound repair, we compared the migration of primary AECs cultured in WT mouse serum to the migration of Vn/ AECs cultured in mouse serum from Vn/ mice. As demonstrated in Figure 4B, the absence of Vn during repair significantly hindered the rate of wound closure (P < 0.05). These results confirm the importance of Vn in alveolar epithelial repair processes.
Source of Vn in AEC Wound Repair Model To better understand how the source of Vn affects our wound assay, we investigated whether serum-derived or epithelial cellderived Vn was most responsible for accelerating the rate of wound closure. To address this question, we compared the rate of wound repair between WT and Vn/ primary AECs initially cultured in mouse serum either containing or deficient in Vn. As shown in Figure 5, the AECs isolated from WT mice and grown to confluence in the presence of WT serum migrated significantly faster than the same cells plated in Vn/ serum (P < 0.05). Vn/ AECs grown to confluence in the presence of WT serum also migrated more rapidly than when they were plated in serum deficient in Vn. On the other hand, there was no difference between the rates of wound closure of WT and Vn/ AECs as long as they formed their respective monolayers in the presence of the same type of serum. Both cell types migrate more rapidly when they are grown to confluence in the presence of Vn-containing serum and more slowly when they are grown to confluence in the absence of this matrix protein. Based on these results, AECs appear to depend primarily on serum-derived Vn to support their migration during wound repair.
Mechanism of Vn Effect on AEC Migration PAI-1, when bound to Vn, has been shown to impair cell adherence and migration by interfering with the integrin-binding site located near the amino-terminus of this matrix protein. The vß3 and vß1 integrins, in particular, have affinity for Vn and have been found to modulate smooth muscle cell migration (9, 25) as well as AEC migration (26). We hypothesized that AECs also require integrin binding to Vn for efficient migration. To test this hypothesis, WT murine AECs were grown to confluence in the presence of WT mouse serum and then wounded. The rate of repair was then measured in the presence or absence of an anti v Ab, an antiß1 Ab, or an antiß3 Ab. As shown in Figure 6A, the presence of anti v and antiß1 Ab significantly slowed WT AEC healing (P < 0.04). Conversely, the antiß3 Ab had no effect on cell migration (Figure 6A). Because both v and ß1 can bind to other matrix proteins (2729), we next assessed whether the influence of these integrin subunits on cell migration was Vn-specific. Figures 6B and 6C show that the anti v and antiß1 Abs do not inhibit epithelial migration in the absence of this matrix protein (P = NS).
Effect of Vn Deficiency on Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Because Vn improved the efficiency of AEC migration in vitro, we postulated that it would influence the degree of repair and the extent of fibrosis after bleomycin-induced lung injury. To investigate this possibility, WT and Vn/ mice were challenged with either intratracheal bleomycin or PBS. After 3 wk, their lungs were analyzed for collagen content. Using hydroxyproline as a measure of lung collagen, bleomycin induced a significant increase in the lung collagen content of both Vn/ and WT mice, an effect not seen in those treated with saline alone (Figure 7). The degree of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, however, was not different between the Vn/ and WT animals.
Successful repair of the alveolar epithelium has been postulated to be a crucial step in minimizing lung fibrosis after injury. The restoration of an injured alveolar epithelium requires both pneumocyte proliferation as well as migration. In this set of experiments, we have defined several critical components of AEC migration during in vitro wound healing. First, we have demonstrated that the balance of uPA and PAI-1 is critical in determining the efficiency of AEC migration. Second, we have found that the effect of PAI-1 on cell motility requires the presence of Vn, and a mutation in the domain of PAI-1 responsible for Vn-binding abrogates its inhibitory effect on wound repair. Third, alveolar epithelial wound healing proceeds more efficiently when cells have access to Vn in their matrix. Finally, we have shown that the efficient migration of AECs on Vn is dependent upon v and ß1 integrin subunit binding. Prior studies have found that PAI-1 adheres to the somatomedin Blike amino terminal end of Vn where it can sterically inhibit the integrin recognition site on this extracellular matrix protein (9, 30, 31). Taken together with these prior studies, our results demonstrate that PAI-1 modulates the rate of alveolar epithelial wound repair by affecting cellular binding to Vn through the vß1 integrin. The mechanism by which the plasminogen system mitigates pulmonary fibrosis is poorly understood. As mentioned previously, successful restoration of the alveolar epithelium has been increasingly recognized as an important step in halting the scarring process. PAI-1 deficiency has been shown to significantly protect against bleomycin-induced fibrosis (6), and the absence of PAI-1 clearly accelerates alveolar epithelial wound healing in our in vitro model. PAI-1deficient mice also demonstrate accelerated cutaneous wound healing (8). Therefore, we speculate that the absence of PAI-1 protects against pulmonary fibrosis by accelerating the migration (and repair) of the alveolar epithelium, whereas increased levels of PAI-1 worsen scarring by delaying or preventing epithelial restoration.
We have demonstrated that the Ab-mediated inhibition of the Our results demonstrate that the antiproteolytic activity of PAI-1 had no effect on wound repair. However, the extracellular matrices present in the lung after injury are likely much more complex in their composition and architecture than the matrices present in our in vitro model. As such, it is possible that AECs also require uPA-mediated proteolysis to negotiate these more diverse matrices and that the antiproteolytic effect of PAI-1 might significantly impact AEC migration during in vivo wound repair. Indeed, human bronchial epithelial cell migration is significantly slowed by the administration of an anti-uPA Ab that interferes with plasminogen activation (10). Although not tested, the antiproteolytic effects of PAI-1, by also interfering with plasminogen activation, should have had a similar inhibitory effect on bronchial epithelial cell wound repair. On the other hand, the migration of smooth muscle cells (which closely parallel the behavior of primary AECs) along more complex Matrigel matrices was not inhibited by PAI-1 unless these matrices also included Vn (9). When Vn was incorporated into the complex matrices, only the Vn-binding properties of PAI-1 (and not the anti-proteolytic activity) were required to inhibit cell movement. Because Vn played such an important role in promoting migration of AECs in our in vitro assay, one might postulate that the transgenic deficiency of this matrix protein would worsen in vivo AEC repair and, in turn, exacerbate the degree of fibrosis after lung injury. Contrary to this hypothesis, 3 wk after bleomycin administration, Vn deficient and WT mice accumulated equivalent quantities of lung collagen. When considered further, these results are in fact entirely congruent with our in vitro experiments. In our culture system, the administration of excess PAI-1, by blocking the integrin binding sites on Vn, slowed repair to a rate similar to that observed when Vn was absent from the matrix. In vivo, bleomycin is known to induce excess PAI-1 expression in WT animals at the site of injury, where it can bind to Vn. The accumulation of PAI-1 in the wound matrix would then interfere with AEC access to Vn for the purpose of migration and, in effect, create a wound environment similar to that of Vn-deficiency. Therefore, in both WT and Vn/ mice, resurfacing of the denuded alveolus will proceed inefficiently because the epithelium is unable to move across a preferred matrix protein. Based on the hypothesis that the degree of fibrosis is, at least in part, determined by the success of epithelial restoration, we predict that WT mice and Vn/ mice would develop a similar degree of collagen after lung injury. Whether PAI-1 modulates pulmonary fibrosis entirely through its Vn-binding properties as we have demonstrated in our in vitro model or whether its antiproteolytic activity is also important remains a matter of speculation and requires further study. The fact that mice deficient in plasminogen develop worse bleomycin-induced lung scarring as compared with littermate control animals implies that uPA-mediated proteolysis is also likely to be important in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis (32). The overexpression of intrapulmonary uPA also limits bleomycin-induced fibrosis, further suggesting a role for the antiproteolytic activity of PAI-1 in vivo (7, 33). On the other hand, the increased expression of uPA in the lung not only increases plasminogen activation, but could also promote epithelial cell migration on Vn by binding PAI-1 and changing its conformation (34, 35). Once bound by uPA, PAI-1 releases from Vn, exposing the integrin binding sites that facilitate cell movement. Thus, uPA overexpression certainly could be limiting pulmonary fibrosis through a Vn-dependent mechanism. Indeed, the addition of exogenous uPA to our in vitro culture system enhanced migration of AECs although its deficiency slowed repair. Taken together with our observation that the PAI-1 (VP+) variant had no effect on cell migration indicates that uPA is likely accelerating wound repair in our culture system by releasing PAI-1 from the Vn-rich matrix.
In summary, PAI-1 decreases the migration of AECs by blocking their
Conflict of Interest Statement: M.H.L. has no declared conflicts of interest; P.J.C. has no declared conflicts of interest; M.D. has no declared conflicts of interest; B.Y. has no declared conflicts of interest; N.M.S. has no declared conflicts of interest; K.E.H. has no declared conflicts of interest; J.M.H. has no declared conflicts of interest; E.S.W. has no declared conflicts of interest; R.H.S. has no declared conflicts of interest; and T.H.S. has no declared conflicts of interest. Received in original form January 26, 2004 Received in final form July 21, 2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||