help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leikauf, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leikauf, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, H. S.
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. Vol. 32, pp. 366, 2005
© 2005 American Thoracic Society
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.F297


Editorial

When Wheeze Leads to Squeeze

Growth under Pressure

George D. Leikauf, Ph.D. and Hitesh S. Deshmukh, M.D.

University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio

In this issue of the Journal (pp. 373–380), Chu and colleagues examine the consequences to the airway epithelium of compressive stress, much like that generated during bronchoconstriction in asthma (1). Compressive and tensile stress have been studied extensively in muscle and bone tissue culture (2), and exciting theories have been advanced as to how it may control the fate of stem cells (3). Much less is certain about the role of the stresses in airway diseases. Previously, these investigators reported that compressive stress led to phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with a subsequent increase in of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) transcripts and immunostaining protein (4). Triggered by stimuli of cell proliferation, membrane-bound EGF family ligands are cleaved by matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and thus shed to bind to EGFR, leading to phosphorylation. Thus, this process of EGFR-activation -> ligand transcription-> MMP activation -> ligand shedding -> EGFR-activation constitutes an autocrine feedback loop, which is thought to be of major concern in mucus cell hyperplasis (5) and possibly airway fibrosis (6).

The mechanisms by which compressive stress leads to EGFR activation are unknown. However, these investigators have proposed that it is due to compression of the lateral intercellular space (LIS) surrounding epithelial cells (7). Assuming a constant shedding rate into a collapsing volume, local ligand concentrations could theoretically increase sufficiently to account for the observed receptor signaling. They also suggest that this effect is not due to osmotic stress response, which activated additional mitogen-activated protein kinases. Although this "LIS squeeze" theory has merits, one could image other possible explanations for the role of other mechanisms triggering mechanotransduction. For example, specialized mechanosensory cells function in many tissues through stretch-activated gated ion channels (8, 9). Cytoskeletal–integrin interactions can activate growth factors possibly through focal adhesion complexes or cell–cell adherens junctions, which have been discussed as mechnosensors leading to altered transcriptional programming (10).

In this new study, findings are broadened to other EGF family members, including epiregulin (which is detected as transcript and protein) and amphiregulin (transcript alone). Transient stress of only a few minutes triggers a response lasting several hours, suggesting long-term consequences of bouts of bronchospasm. However, this process seems to wane when continuous compression is extended past 4 h, suggesting that the existence of an "off" mechanism yet to be discovered. Regulation of the stop signal obviously may be critical in many biological processes, including organogenesis, hyperplasia, and tumorigenesis. In all these processes, coordinated growth achieves the desired size, shape, and function. In contrast, nonuniformity resulting from either the lack of cells to stop growing or other cells to keep up with growth ("cell competition") leads to mounting mechanical stress, which may trigger these feedback signals that regulate cell division and ensure stability of growth (11). In a pseudostratified environment, understanding the possible mechanisms by which the epithelial cells communicate with their environment, transduce stress, grow and stop growing, and differentiate remains a fascinating open question.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement: G.D.L. has no declared conflicts of interest; H.S.D. has no declared conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chu EK, Foley JS, Cheng J, Patel AS, Drazen JM, Tschumperlin DJ. Bronchial epithelial compression regulates EGFR family ligand expression in an autocrine manner. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 32:373–380.
  2. Epstein ND, Davis JS. Sensing stretch is fundamental. Cell 2003;112:147–150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Estes BT, Gimble JM, Guilak F. Mechanical signals as regulators of stem cell fate. Curr Top Dev Biol 2004;60:91–126.[Medline]
  4. Tschumperlin DJ, Shively JD, Swartz MA, Silverman ES, Haley KJ, Raab G, Drazen JM. Bronchial epithelial compression regulates MAP kinase signaling and HB-EGF-like growth factor expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;282:L904–L911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Deshmukh HS, Case LM, Wesselkamper SC, Borchers MT, Martin LD, Shertzer HG, Nadel JA, Leikauf GD. Metalloproteinases mediate mucin 5AC expression by epidermal growth factor receptor activation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:305–314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zhang L, Rice AB, Adler K, Sannes P, Martin L, Gladwell W, Koo JS, Gray TE, Bonner JC. Vanadium stimulates human bronchial epithelial cells to produce heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:123–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tschumperlin DJ, Dai G, Maly IV, Kikuchi T, Laiho LH, McVittie AK, Haley KJ, Lilly CM, So PT, Lauffenburger DA, et al. Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space. Nature 2004;429:83–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hamill OP, Martina B. Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiol Rev 2001;81:685–740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gillespie PG, Walker RG. Molecular basis of mechanosensory transduction. Nature 2001;413:194–202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bershadsky AD, Balaban NQ, Geiger B. Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003;19:677–695.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Shraiman BI. Mechanical feedback as possible regulator of tissue growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:3318–3323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leikauf, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leikauf, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deshmukh, H. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2005 American Thoracic Society.