help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on April 5, 2007, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2005-0345RC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2005-0345RCv1
37/1/9    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cong, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cong, Y.
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. Vol. 37, pp. 9-19, 2007
© 2007 American Thoracic Society
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0345RC


Rapid Communications

G1 Phase Cell Cycle Arrest Induced by SARS-CoV 3a Protein via the Cyclin D3/pRb Pathway

Xiaoling Yuan*, Zhenyu Yao*, Jie Wu, Yusen Zhou, Yajun Shan, Bo Dong, Zhenhu Zhao, Ping Hua, Jiapei Chen and Yuwen Cong

Department of Pathophysiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, and State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Department of Pathogenic Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Yuwen Cong, Ph.D., Department of Pathophysiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, No. 27 Taiping Road, Beijing, 100850, China. E-mail: congyw{at}nic.bmi.ac.cn


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 References
 
SARS-CoV 3a is a structural protein, mainly localizing to Golgi apparatus and co-localizing with SARS-CoV M in co-transfected cells. Here we observed that transient expression of 3a inhibited cell growth and prevented 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, suggesting that 3a deregulated cell cycle progression. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated that 3a expression was associated with blockage of cell cycle progression at G1 phase in HEK 293, COS-7, and Vero cells 24–60 h after transfection. Mutation analysis of 3a revealed that C-terminal region (176 aa ~ 274 aa), including a potential calcium ATPase motif, was essential for induction of cell cycle arrest. Topological analysis showed that 3a predominantly located in Golgi apparatus, with its N-terminus residing in the lumen (Nlum) and C-terminus in the cytosol (Ccyt). Analyzing the cellular proteins involving in regulation of cell cycle progression, we demonstrated that 3a expression was correlated with a significant reduction of cyclin D3 level and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein at Ser-795 and Ser-809/811, not with the expression of cyclin D1, D2, cdk4, and cdk6 in 293 cells. Increases in p53 phosphorylation on Ser-15 were observed in both SARS-CoV M and 3a transfected cells, suggesting that it might not correlate with the 3a-induced G0/G1 phase arrest. The reduction of cyclin D3 level and phosphorylation of Rb were further confirmed in SARS-CoV infected Vero cells. These results indicate that SARS-CoV 3a protein, through limiting the expression of cyclin D3, may inhibit Rb phosphorylation, which in turn leads to a block in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and an inhibition of cell proliferation.

Key Words: SARS-CoV 3a • growth inhibition • G1 phase cell cycle arrest • cyclin D3 • pRb



    CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 References
 
Our results suggested that the SARS-CoV 3a protein plays important roles in the SARS-CoV life cycle and virus-induced pathogenesis.

 
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), caused by SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), is a life-threatening emerging infectious disease originating from Guangdong Province, China (1, 2). SARS-CoV, a distant member of Group 2 coronaviruses, has recently been identified as the etiologic agent of SARS (35). Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the SARS-CoV genome showed that it is nearly 30 kb in length and organized with the gene order that is characteristic for coronavirus [5'-replicase (rep), Spike (S), Envelope (E), Membrane (M), Nucleocapsid (N)-3']. The genome of SARS-CoV also contains nine genes specifying so-called "accessory proteins" located between S and E, and M and N genes. All these ORFs are predicted to be expressed from eight subgenomic mRNAs identified in SARS-CoV–infected Vero cells, and remarkably, up to four of the eight SARS-CoV subgenomic mRNAs may be functionally bicistronic (6). The exact roles of these SARS-CoV–specific accessory proteins are poorly understood. Previous studies demonstrated that accessory protein genes of other coronaviruses, which vary in size, sequence, and position in the genome, are dispensable for virus replication, at least in cell culture. Still, they may be important for virus–host interaction in the in vivo situation. For example, mutants or deletion of one of these genes, such as the 7b gene of feline coronavirus and gene 3 of swine enteric and respiratory coronavirus, have been reported to relate to reduced virulence and pathogenesis (7, 8), indicating a possible in vivo function.

The product of the SARS-CoV 3a gene (CDS: 25252–26074), also referred to as ORF3, X1, and U274 in other articles, was identified separately in the SARS-CoV–infected cells, lung specimen from a patient with SARS, and crude virions (911). Previously, it was reported that 3a protein is located in the Golgi apparatus, and the second or third trans-membrane regions are responsible for the Golgi localization (12). The integral membrane protein 3a interacts with other structural proteins, such as S, M, and E proteins, as well as nonstructural protein U122, in infected or transfected Vero E6 cells (9). Recently published papers showed that the 3a gene product is a structural protein of SARS-CoV (13, 14). Overall, these findings suggest that the 3a protein is an important protein in the viral life cycle. In this study, we first present evidence that overexpression of the 3a gene can inhibit cell growth and block cell cycle progression at the G1 phase. The domain responsible for these functions was further identified through construction of a series of truncated mutants of the 3a gene. The mechanism behind the G1 phase arrest principally involved a decrease in expression of cyclin D3 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. These results suggested that the 3a protein plays important roles in the SARS-CoV life cycle and virus-induced pathogenesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 References
 
Cell Culture and Transfection
Human embryonic kidney cell lines, HEK 293, and African green monkey kidney cell lines, Vero E6 and COS-7, were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS. Cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified environment with 5% CO2. When cell density in a culture plate reached 70% confluence, the cells were transfected with different plasmid DNAs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, the total amount of DNA transfected into the cells in each well was adjusted to 2 µg/ml by using empty pCMV-myc vector. Cells were incubated with transfection mixtures for 5 h and then replaced with fresh medium.

Construction of Expressing Vectors of SARS-CoV 3a and its Mutants
The 3a gene used for this study was PCR-amplified from the SARS-CoV (ZJ01, AY297028) genome using Taq DNA polymerase (NEB). PCR was performed with a forward primer (containing an EcoR I site) complementary to the 5' end of the 3a gene and a reverse primer (containing a Xho I site) complementary to the 3' end of the 3a gene (Table 1). This product was cut with EcoR I and Xho I, and cloned into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of the pCMV-myc vector (Clontech), producing a 3a/pCMV-myc plasmid. The sequence of the plasmid was confirmed by sequencing. The serial mutants of 3a gene/pCMV-myc, green fluorescent protein (GFP)/pCMV-myc, 3a-hemagglutinin (HA)/pcDNA3.1, SARS-CoV membrane protein (M)/pCMV-myc, and M-HA/pcDNA3.1 constructs were made in a similar fashion, and the oligonucleotide primers used are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. PRIMERS USED FOR WILD-TYPE AND TRUNCATED 3a CONSTRUCTS

 
Growth Curves and 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-Diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide Assay
HEK 293 cells seeded in a 24-well plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA) were transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc and pCMV-myc in triplicate. At 12-h intervals after transfection, cells were rinsed with PBS and a single cell suspension was prepared by trypsinization. Viable cells, which are resistant to trypan blue staining, were counted with a hemacytometer chamber. To avoid bias, counting was done blindly by two individuals for each sample. Cells transfected with at least three independent clones were analyzed.

For the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, HEK 293 cells seeded in a 96-well plate (Costar) were transfected with different concentrations of 3a/pCMV-myc and pCMV-myc plasmids in triplicate. After 48 h, each well was supplemented with 20 µl of MTT solution (5 mg/ml), and incubated for 3 h. The medium was removed and 200 µl of DMSO were added to each well. Then the plate was vibrated to dissolve crystals and the absorbance (O.D.) at 570 nm was measured. The experiments were independently repeated three times.

Confocal Microscopy Analysis
The cellular localization of the SARS-CoV 3a protein and its mutants was studied in transfected cells according to the procedure described previously (12).

For 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation, Vero E6 and COS-7 cells were transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc and M/pCMV-myc. At 24 h after transfection, cells on glass cover slips were incubated with 10 µmol/liter BrdUrd for 4 h at 37°C and fixed with 100% methanol at 4°C for 10 min. Incorporated BrdUrd was exposed by treatment with 2 M hydrochloric acid at 37°C for 2 h, followed by neutralization in 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.5). After washing in PBS, cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 5 min and incubated with anti-BrdUrd (1:100; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and anti-myc (1:100; Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA) antibodies for 1 h. Images were viewed and collected with a confocal fluorescence microscope connected to a Bio-Rad Radiance 2100 laser scanner (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA).

Flow Cytometric Cell Cycle Analysis
For flow cytometry, 2 x 106 transfected cells were fixed overnight with 70% cold ethanol at 4°C. Cells were then permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS, incubated with anti-myc antibody (1:100) and fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated mouse anti-IgG (1:100) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), resuspended in propidium iodide (PI, 50 µg/ml) staining solution (containing DNase-free RNase A 20 µg/ml) for 30 min in the dark, and analyzed immediately by flow cytometry. DNA contents and other fluorescence-activated cell sorter data were analyzed with CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) (15).

Western Blot Analysis
The transfected (or infected) cells were harvested at the indicated times after transfection (or infection). Preparation the total cell lysates and Western blot analysis were performed according to the procedure described before (16). Briefly, the cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to NC membranes (Osmonics, Inc., Westboro, MA). The membranes were probed with primary antibodies (antibodies against myc, beta-actin, cyclin D1, cyclin D2, p53, phospho-p53 on Ser-15, Rb, phospho-Rb on Ser-795 and Ser-809/811, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D3, cdc2, and cyclin A; all antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling) and subsequently with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies. Antibody detection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Cell Signaling).

When it was necessary to reprobe the membrane with another antibody, the membrane was stripped with stripping buffer (2% SDS, 100 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8) at 50°C for 30 min and washed with TBST (Tris-HCl 20 mmol/liter, NaCl 140 mmol/liter, Tween 20 0.1%) buffer before use.

Infection of Vero E6 Cells with SARS-CoV
SARS-CoV (BJ01, AY278488) was grown as described previously (17). When the cell density in a 60-mm culture flask reached 90% confluence, the Vero E6 cells were infected with 1 x 104 TCID50 of SARS-CoV, in a final volume of 2 ml of DMEM with 2% FBS for 1 h at 37°C. Then the cells were washed with PBS, and replaced with complete medium to allow growth. At 6 and 24 h after infection, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40 (Sigma), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.005% SDS. A total of 20 µl of the lysate was used for Western blot analysis (described above).

RT-PCR Assay
Total RNA was prepared from 3a/pCMV-myc– or pCMV-myc–transfected cells. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using the primers for cyclin D3 (sense primer, 5'-CCT CCT ACT TCC AGT GCG TG-3'; antisense primer, 5'-GCA ACT CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT T-3') (299 bp) and beta-actin (sense primer, 5'-CAC TCT TCC AGC CTT CCT TCC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-CGG ACT CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT T-3')(388 bp) genes.

Statistical and Densitometric Analysis
Statistic analysis was performed by using Student's t test. Data are reported as the mean and SD. Bands on Western blotting were scanned under a scanner (Microtek, Carson, CA), and the mean density of each band was analyzed by using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). The protein expression and mRNA levels were plotted after normalization against actin or corresponding nonphosphorylated total protein signal.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 References
 
Cell Growth Is Inhibited in Transfected Cells Expressing the SARS-CoV 3a Protein
In this study, the 3a gene of SARS-CoV (ZJ01, AY297028), was cloned into the pCMV-myc vector and expressed in HEK 293 cells as described before (12). We have observed that HEK 293 cells transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc grow slower than pCMV-myc–transfected cells. We thus speculated that expression of 3a gene may inhibit cell proliferation. Compared with exponentially growing control cells transfected with pCMV-myc, cells expressing the 3a gene showed a significant decrease in cell number after 24 h (Figure 1A). In the 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells, less than 4.8% of the cells were dead, which indicated that the reason for the decrease in cell number was not the cell death, but may be the cell growth inhibition induced by 3a gene expression. The above experiments were repeated with MTT assay, a more sensitive colorimetric test to monitor the cell proliferation. As shown in Figure 1B, the growth inhibition of 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected HEK 293 cells was significantly dependent on the dose of plasmid used for transfection, whereas the growth of 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected HEK 293 cells was marginally inhibited at the highest dose of plasmid (1.0–2.0µg/ml). Based on its apparent ability to inhibit cell growth, 1.0 µg/ml 3a/pCMV-myc plasmid was used for transfection in our subsequent experiments. To address the mechanism of 3a on cell growth inhibition, cell DNA synthesis was further measured by BrdUrd incorporation (15). In view of the propensity of HEK 293 cells easily to form cell's dumpling after treatment with 2 M hydrochloric acid, COS-7 cells were used in the assay. As shown in Figure 1C, ~ 75% of myc-3a–negative COS-7 cells had incorporated BrdUrd, while almost all myc-3a–expressing cells had little or no BrdUrd incorporation (only 2.85% positive cells). Similar results were obtained in myc-3a–transfected Vero E6 cells (data not shown). As a control, both myc-M (the membrane protein of SARS-CoV)–positive and –negative cells had similar rates of BrdUrd incorporation (63% versus 68%). These data indicate that 3a expression inhibits cells growth and prevented cell cycle entry into S phase.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Inhibition of cell proliferation by expression of the SARS-CoV 3a protein. (A) Growth inhibition of protein 3a in the transfected cells. HEK 293 cells were transfected with equivalent amounts of pCMV-myc (control) or 3a/pCMV-myc. At 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after transfection, samples were collected and counted using a hand-held counter. Cell counts at each time point were the mean values of three independent experiments with standard deviation (SD). *P < 0.05 versus control. (B) Effects of different amounts of plasmid DNA on the growth of pCMV-myc– or 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells. One hundred microliters of HEK 293 cells were transfected with different concentrations of pCMV-myc or 3a/pCMV-myc in 96-well culture plates. After 48 h, each well was supplemented with MTT solution and the absorbance (O.D.) at 570 nm was measured. The experiments were independently repeated three times, and one experiment was presented with three duplicates at each concentration. The data shown was the mean of three independent experiments ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control. (C) Overexpression of the 3a protein inhibited DNA replication of COS-7 cells. At 24 h after transfection with 3a/pCMV-myc or M/pCMV-myc, COS-7 cells were incubated with 10 µmol/liter BrdUrd for 4 h and stained with anti-BrdUrd and anti-myc antibodies. Images were viewed and collected under a confocal fluorescence microscope. The left panels show myc-3a or myc-M positive cells, the middle panels show BrdUrd incorporation cells, and the right panels display overlay of BrdUrd and myc-3a (myc-M) staining images.

 
Induction of G1 Phase Cell Cycle Arrest by the SARS-CoV 3a Protein
Cell cycle deregulation is a common response of host cells to many virus infections, and some viral proteins have been shown to be efficient in inducing cell cycle arrest, such as orf-a of feline immunodeficiency virus and nonstructural protein p28 of murine hepatitis coronavirus (MHV) (18, 19). Flow cytometry is a rapid, quantitative, multiparameter cell analysis based on the measurement of visible and fluorescent light emission. Using the myc-tag to identify the transfected (myc-tag–positive cells) and nontransfected cells (myc-tag–negative cells) in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected HEK 293 cells (15), the cell cycle of the two populations was analyzed, and the transfection efficiency of 3a/pCMV-myc was revealed to be 20.2% by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 2A, ~ 67% of the cells positive for 3a gene expression were in the G1 phase, whereas only ~ 50% of the 3a-negative cells were in G1 phase at 24 h after transfection. To further confirm the effect of 3a gene expression, HEK 293 cells were transfected with M/pCMV-myc and GFP/pCMV-myc. The transfection efficiencies of myc-GFP and myc-M expression plasmids were found to be 35.7% and 34.0%, respectively. As shown in Figure 2A, the myc-M– and myc-GFP–positive and –negative populations had similar cell cycle progression profiles, indicating that the expression of myc-M or myc-GFP had little effect on the cell cycle. As controls, HEK 293 control cells and pCMV-myc–transfected HEK 293 cells had similar cell cycle profiles, with ~ 50% of the cells in the G1 phase (data not shown). To test whether the G1 phase arrest induced by 3a gene expression was cell line specific or not, pCMV-myc and 3a/pCMV-myc were separately transfected into COS-7 and Vero E6 cells. The transfection efficiencies in the two cell types were ~ 18%. As in the case of 293 cells, transfection with pCMV-myc had little effect on cell cycle profiles of COS-7 and Vero E6 cells (data not shown). In both cell lines, G1 phase arrest induced by 3a gene expression was observed, which was as obvious as that in 293 cells, suggesting that a common mechanism in the different cell lines is involved in 3a protein–induced G1 phase arrest (Figure 2B).


Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. G1 phase cell cycle arrest induced by the SARS-CoV 3a protein. (A) Expression of the 3a gene–induced G1 phase cell cycle arrest. 3a/pCMV-myc, M/pCMV-myc, or pCMV-myc was transfected into HEK 293 cells. At 24 h after transfection, samples were collected and stained with anti-myc antibody and PI. The DNA contents of cells were measured by flow cytometry. The cell cycle profiles of myc-3a (or myc-M) expressed cells are shown in the middle column and represented as "myc positive," while "myc negative" in the right column represents the nontransfected cells in the same population. The experiments were independently repeated three times. (B) G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the 3a protein in different cells. COS-7 and Vero E6 cells were transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc for 24 h, followed by staining with anti-myc antibody and propidium iodide. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as above. The histogram showed the percentages of myc-3a–positive and –negative cells at various phases of cell cycle with means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (C) G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the 3a protein at different times after transfection. HEK 293 cells were transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc. At 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after transfection, samples were collected and analyzed by flow cytometry as before. Myc-3a–positive and –negative cells were shown with different column. The histogram showed the percentages of cells at various phase of cell cycle with means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (D) Expression levels of myc-3a protein at different times after transfection. HEK 293 cells were transfected with equivalent amounts of 3a/pCMV-myc plasmid. At given times after transfection, cell lysates were prepared and probed with anti-myc or anti-actin antibody.

 
The G1 phase arrest is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint, which acts as an important safeguard for genomic stability. Cells in G1 phase arrest may go into apoptosis, or recover from the G1 phase to enter into the S phase (15, 20). To observe the denouement of the G1 phase arrest induced by the 3a protein, cell cycle analysis was performed in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected HEK 293 cells from 24–60 h after transfection. A significant increase in the percentage of cells in the G1 phase, and concomitant reduction in percentage of cells in S phase, was noticeable in 3a protein–expressing cells between 24 and 60 h after transfection relative to control cells, with a maximum induction of G1 phase arrest being observed at 24 h after transfection (Figure 2C). After 24 h, although there was some increases in the number of cells in S phase, a G1 phase arrest was still noticeable in 3a protein–expressing cells, indicating that this arrest was not due to a cell density effect. Western blotting assay showed that the expression levels of myc-3a protein in the transfected cells were similar between 24 and 60 h after transfection (Figure 2D). The reasons for the increase in the number of cells in S phase at the later times might be that some cells expressing lower level of myc-3a could slowly enter into S phase. Sub-G1 phases, representing one type of cell apoptosis, were observed from 24 to 60 h after transfection, but were not over 6% of analyzed cells. These data support the idea that the 3a protein is not an inductor of apoptosis, but of cell cycle arrestor.

Cellular Localization and Induction of G1 Phase Arrest of Truncated 3a Protein Mutants
To define the functional domain of the 3a protein involved in the induction of cell cycle arrest, a series of truncated mutants were constructed according to the bioinformation analysis reported in other articles (Figure 3A) (4, 5, 12). The 3a protein is proposed to have three trans-membrane regions located at residues 34–56, 77–99, and 103–125. Truncated mutants of the 3a gene were cloned into pCMV-myc vector separately. These mutants were expressed and migrated to the expected molecular mass. The subcellular localization of these proteins was analyzed in HEK 293 cells as described before (12). As shown in Figure 3B, mutants D77–274, D99–274, and D1–222, containing one to three of the predicted trans-membrane domains, co-localized well with Golgi-DsRed fusion protein in the cytoplasm of co-transfected cells, which is similar to wild-type 3a protein. While mutant D176–274 contained no trans-membrane domains, it partly co-localized with the Golgi marker, but mainly localized to the cytoplasm and to a small extent in the nucleus.


Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Subcellular localization and cell cycle arrest induction of the 3a-truncated mutants. (A) Schematic representation of the 3a-truncated mutants. Serial 3a-truncated mutants were constructed based on bioinformatic analysis of the 3a protein. The boxes represent the trans-membrane domains referred to as a, b, and c for the first, second, and third domain, and the black bar represents the Yxx{Phi} motif, respectively. The amino acid positions for these domains are given below. The G1 phase cell cycle arrests of these 3a mutants are shown on the right (Y, yes; N, no). (B) Subcellular localization of 3a-truncated mutants. The plasmids of serial mutants of 3a (D77–274, D99–274, D176–274, and D1–222) and pDsRed-Golgi were co-transfected into HEK 293 cells separately. At 24 h after transfection, the cells on glass slips were cells were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and viewed with anti-myc antibody. The nucleus was stained with Hoechst 33342. Co-localizations of serial 3a-truncated mutants with Golgi marker were observed under a confocal fluorescence microscope. (C) The effects of 3a-truncated mutants on G1 phase cell cycle arrest. The plasmids of the serial 3a-truncated mutants were transfected into HEK 293 cells. At 24 h after transfection, samples were collected and stained with anti-myc antibody and PI. The DNA contents of cells were measured by flow cytometry as before. The cell cycle profiles of "myc-positive" and "myc-negative" cells are shown in the middle and right columns respectively. The experiments were independently repeated three times.

 
Furthermore, a cell cycle analysis was performed as before in HEK 293 cells. At 24 h after transfection with 3a-mutants/pCMV-myc and pCMV-myc plasmids, cells were collected and analyzed by flow cytometry. The transfection efficiencies of myc-3a, D77–274, D99–274, D176–274, and D1–222 in the samples analyzed were 18.4, 29.2, 22.1, 18.6, and 41.2%, respectively. As shown in Figure 3C, when compared with transfection-negative cells, mutants D77–274, D99–274, D176–274, and 3a all had a similar ability to induce G1 phase cell cycle arrest, but D1–222 had not. It was concluded that the C-terminal domain of 3a may be responsible for its cell cycle arrest induction. Recent articles reported that the C-terminal domain of the 3a protein contains a Yxx{varphi} motif (160 aa–173 aa), which was important for the internalization of the 3a protein from the plasma membrane (9), and a potential calcium ATPase motif (200 aa–274 aa) (9, 10). The C-terminally truncated mutant (D1–222), containing the Yxx{varphi} motif (160 aa–173 aa), could not induce G1 phase arrest, which further suggested that the potential calcium ATPase motif is important for the 3a protein to induce cell cycle arrest.

Topology of the SARS-CoV 3a Protein in the Golgi Apparatus
The SARS-CoV 3a protein was reported to mainly localize to the Golgi apparatus. To gain more information about the mechanism by which the 3a protein induces cell cycle arrest, the membrane topology of the 3a protein in Golgi apparatus was analyzed. The SARS-CoV 3a and M proteins were fused to the myc and HA tags at their N- and C-terminus, respectively, and expressed in HEK 293 cells. The orientation of the HA and myc epitopes was determined by immunofluorescence microscopy using HA- or myc-specific antibodies in permeabilized (Triton X-100–treated) and semipermeabilized (digitonin-treated) cells. The SARS-CoV M protein, which is proposed to localize to the Golgi apparatus with its N-terminus in the lumen and its C-terminus in the cytosol (Nlum-Ccyt), served as a control to confirm the integrity of the Golgi complex (21, 22). As shown in Figure 4, the myc epitopes of the 3a and M proteins could both be detected after Triton X-100 treatment, but not after digitonin treatment, indicating a lumenal position of the myc tag. In contrast, the HA epitopes were detected in both Triton X-100– and digitonin-treated cells, demonstrating a cytosolic localization of the HA epitope. These data clearly demonstrated that the expressed 3a protein, as well as the M protein, localize to Golgi apparatus with a NlumCcyt orientation. Bioinformatics analysis and subcellular localization analysis of the series of 3a mutants both indicated that the three trans-membrane regions lie in the N-terminus between 34 and 143 aa of the 3a protein. As presented in the above results, the functional domain of the 3a protein for inducing cell cycle arrest probably localized to its cytoplasmic region. In this conformation, it is proposed that the C-terminal domain of the 3a protein can easily interact with cytoplasmic protein involved in cell cycle regulation.


Figure 4
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Topology of the 3a protein in the Golgi apparatus. HEK 293 cells were transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc, 3a-HA/pcDNA3.1, M/pCMV-myc, or M-HA/pcDNA3.1 plasmids, respectively. At 24 h after transfection, cells on glass slips were collected, permeabilized with Triton X-100 or digitonin, and then viewed with anti-myc or anti-HA antibody. The nucleus was stained with Hoechst 33342. Cellular localization of the 3a and M fusion proteins was analyzed under a confocal fluorescence microscope.

 
G1 Phase Arrest Induced by the SARS-CoV 3a Protein via Cyclin D3/pRb Pathway
Rb phosphorylation is a critical step in the G1 to S phase transition. Phosphorylation of Rb is regulated primarily by complexes of cyclin D associated with CDK4/6 and later by cyclin E associated with CDK2. To understand the mechanism of 3a-induced G0/G1 phase arrest, we first examined the phosphorylation status of Rb in transfected cells by Western blotting analysis. The total HEK 293 cells transfected with pCMV-myc, 3a/pCMV-myc, and M/pCMV-myc plasmids were collected at 24 h after transfection and analyzed with antibodies against Rb phosphorylation on Ser-795 and Ser-807/811. As shown in Figure 5A, myc-3a and myc-M were expressed at the expected molecular mass, and when compared with control and myc-transfected cells, the Rb phosphorylation on Ser-795 and Ser-807/811 was down-regulated in myc-3a– and myc-M–transfected cells and was more significant in myc-3a–transfected cells, indicating that the expression of 3a inhibits Rb phosphorylation and block cell cycle progression at G0/G1 phase. The phosphorylation status of Rb was further studied in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells. Expression of myc-3a was observed at all the time points with the highest level at 24 h after transfection, whereas the phosphorylation of Rb on Ser-795 and Ser-807/811 decreased gradually after transfection. In bisacrylamide cross-linked gels, hyperphosphorylated Rb migrates slowly, while hypophosphorylated and nonphosphorylated Rb comigrate and appear as a more rapidly migrating band (18, 20). Using an anti-Rb antibody, the phosphorylation status of Rb was further determined. In control pCMV-myc and M/pCMV-myc–transfected cells, the majority of Rb appeared as a slowly migrating band, while in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells, the rapidly migrating band was detected from 24 h after transfection, indicating hypophosphorylation of Rb. These results suggested that the 3a protein arrests cell proliferation by regulating Rb phosphorylation (Figure 5A).


Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5
View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. The effects of the 3a protein on the phosphorylation and/or expression of Rb, cyclins, and cdks related to G1 cell cycle. (A) Expression and phosphorylation of Rb in the transfected cells. HEK 293 cells were transfected with equivalent amounts of pCMV-myc, M/pCMV-myc, or 3a/pCMV-myc plasmid, and cells were transfected without plasmid as control. At 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after transfection, cell lysates were prepared and probed with anti-myc, anti-phospho-Rb on Ser-795 or Ser-809/811, anti-Rb, or anti-actin antibody. The bands of p-Rb were quantified using densitometric analysis and plotted after normalization against actin. The histogram shows the means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (B) Levels of cyclin D3, CDK4, and CDK6 in the transfected cells. Cell lysates were prepared as before and probed with anti-Cyclin D3, anti-CDK4, anti-CDK6 or anti-actin antibody. Cells were transfected without plasmid as control. The bands of cyclin D3 were quantified using densitometric analysis and plotted after normalization against actin. The histogram shows the means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (C) Levels of cyclin D3 and Rb in SARS-CoV–infected cells. At 6 and 24 h after SARS-CoV infection, Vero E6 cells lysates were prepared as before and probed with anti-cyclin D3, anti-Rb, or anti-actin antibody. The bands of cyclin D3 were quantified using densitometric analysis and plotted after normalization against actin. The histogram shows the means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (D) Transcription of cyclin D3 mRNA in transfected cells. After transfection with equivalent amounts of pCMV-myc or 3a/pCMV-myc, the total RNA prepared from the HEK 293 cells were used for RT-PCR. Reactions were performed with primers for beta-actin as internal controls and primers for cyclin D3 were detected at the same time. PCR products were separated on 1.2% agarose gel. The bands of cyclin D3 were quantified using densitometric analysis and plotted after normalization against actin. The histogram shows the means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments. (E) Expression and phosphorylation of p53 in the transfected cells. Cell lysates were prepared as before and probed with anti-p53, anti-phospho-p53 on Ser-15 or anti-actin antibody. Cells were transfected without plasmid as control. The bands of p-p53 were quantified using densitometric analysis and plotted after normalization against the amounts of p53. The histogram shows the means ± SD for three independent sets of experiments.

 
Rb Ser-795 and Ser-809/811 are targets of active cyclin D/CDK4/6 complexes (23). The observed decrease in its phosphorylation prompted us to examine the expression of cyclin D1, D2, D3, cdk4, and cdk6 in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells by Western blots. No significant changes were observed in the levels of cdk4 and cdk6 between pCMV-myc, M/pCMV-my, and 3a/pCMV-myc. And the expression of cdk4 and cdk6 were not obviously different from 12–48 h after transfection with 3a/pCMV-myc (Figure 5B). In contrast, cyclin D3 was decreased in both myc-3a– and myc-M–expressed cells and became more significantly so in myc-3a–expressed cells when compared with controls. Furthermore, the level of cyclin D3 was significantly decreased from 12–48 h after transfection with 3a/pCMV-myc, which was consistent with the changes of Rb phosphorylation (Figure 5B). The expression of cyclin D1 and D2 was not observed in HEK 293 transfected with 3a/pCMV-myc, M/pCMV-myc, and pCMV-myc, respectively (data not shown).

In addition, cyclin D3 expression and Rb phosphorylation were examined in SARS-CoV–infected Vero E6 cells. In this experiment, no cytopathic effects (CPU) were observed at 6 h after infection, while at ~ 24 h after infection, the cells showed 25% CPU. As shown in Figure 5C, the protein level of cyclin D3 was decreased at 6 h and significantly decreased at 24 h after infection. When compared with the mock infection, the rapidly migrating bands representing the hypophosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Rb appeared at 6 h and significantly at 24 h after infection. The decrease in cyclin D3 levels and the appearance of the hypophosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Rb in infected cells were consistent with that in the transfected cells. In addition, transcription of cyclin D3 mRNA was analyzed by RT-PCR assay. As compared with the control cells, the transcriptional level of cyclin D3 was decreased obviously in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells (Figure 5D). From the above data, it was concluded that in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells and SARS-CoV–infected cells, expression of cyclin D3 was reduced, which, in turn, may lead to phosphorylation of Rb, a block in G1 phase of cell cycle, and an inhibition of proliferation.

CDK-inhibitors (CKIs) are well known to interfere with cell cycle progression and to cause phase-specific cycle arrest. These inhibitors perturb the phosphorylation process by directly interacting with their target proteins, such as cyclins or CDKs. As shown in Figure 5E, p53 phosphorylation on Ser-15 was up-regulated in both 3a and M gene–expressed cells and gradually increased in a time-dependent manner in 3a/pCMV-myc–transfected cells, while the protein levels of p53 were unaffected by 3a and M gene expression. As no significant difference on p53 phosphorylation was observed between 3a and M gene–expressed cells, and the levels of p21Cip and p27Kip, members of the Cip/Kip subfamily, were unchanged by 3a or M expression (data not shown), it is proposed that p53 phosphorylation might be induced by higher expression of foreign proteins at the Golgi apparatus and not associated with 3a-induced G1 phase arrest.

According to current concepts, the cell cycle commitment after restriction point passage requires the sustained stimulation by mitogens of the synthesis of labile D-type cyclins, which associate with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 to phosphorylate Rb family proteins and sequester the CDK inhibitor such as p21(WAF1) and p27kip1. Cyclin D3 is expressed in nearly all proliferating cells and has shown the most broad expression pattern of the three D-type cyclins (cyclin D1, D2, and D3). Lin and coworkers reported that the Cdk6–cyclin D3 complex is unique among the D cyclin and kinase combinations in the ability to promote the cell cycle start, evading the inhibition by p27(KIP1) and p21(CIP1) with a resemblance to viral cyclin-bound Cdk6 (24). PTEN tumor suppressor gene, PKA activation, and some anti-tumor agents such as glucocorticoids were reported to have arrested cell cycle progression in G1 phase by decreasing cyclin D3 mRNA levels and/or by inducing its proteasomal degradation. Furthermore, enforced expression of cyclin D3 abrogated the PTEN-induced cell cycle arrest, while silencing cyclin D3 by RNA interference further inhibited S phase entry, indicating a key role for cyclin D3 repression in these events (25, 26). The decreases in the protein level of cyclin D3 were observed in the measles virus (MV) and MHV-infected cells and may play some roles for the virus in inducing G1 cell cycle arrest (20, 27). In this article, we first reported that the expression of SARS-CoV 3a gene arrested cell cycle progression in G1 phase by a significant down-modulation of cyclin D3. It would be interesting to define the pathway for 3a protein to decrease the expression of cyclin D3.

The role of cell cycle arrest induced by the 3a protein was not determined in the life cycle of SARS-CoV, but was proposed from recent studies. Infection of MHV, a member of coronavirus family, was recently reported to result in inhibition of host cellular DNA synthesis and accumulation of cells in G1 phase in activating DBT and 17Cl-1 cells through inducing cyclin D2 and cyclin E degradation (28). The expression of nonstructural protein p28 of MHV was reported to induce G1 phase arrest in transfected cells and might be responsible for MHV to induce cell cycle arrest (18). Increasing data proposed that cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase might favor coronavirus replication and exacerbate virus-induced pathogenicity, especially in some aspect, for example increasing amounts of ribonucleotide pools for efficient coronavirus RNA synthesis, preventing the induction and execution of early cell death in infected cells, assisting in efficient coronavirus assembly, benefiting cap-dependent translation of coronavirus proteins, and decreasing the killing efficiency of coronavirus-infected cells by cytotoxic T cells (20, 28). In this article, we reported that expression of 3a could significantly inhibit cell growth and induce cell G1 phase arrest in different types of transfected cells and infected Vero E6 cells. This suggested that the 3a protein may favor SARS-CoV replication by inducing cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase, and moreover, plays an important role in SARS-CoV–induced pathogenesis.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Prof. Eric J. Snijder (Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands), Prof. Milton Taylor (Indiana University, USA), Dr. Sherief (Rutgers), and Dr. Gang Li for critical reading of the manuscript; Associated-Prof. Zhou Tao for the assay of confocal microscopy; and Drs. Liu Hong-Yan, Li Su-Yan, and Feng Yan-Bin for the construction of some plasmids. The authors also thank Dr. Baochang Fan (Indiana Univetsity) for some help.


    Footnotes
 
* These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

This work was supported by a grant from the Nature Sciences Foundation of China (30470093).

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0345RC on April 5, 2007

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form September 7, 2005

Accepted in final form December 25, 2006


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 References
 

  1. Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, Finkelstein S, Rose D, Green K, Tellier R, Draker R, Adachi D, Ayers M, et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1995–2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, Lam WK, Seto WH, Yam LY, Cheung TM, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1977–1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S, Rabenau H, Panning M, Kolesnikova L, Fouchier RA, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1967–1976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Marra MA, Jones SJ, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooks-Wilson A, Butterfield YS, Khattra J, Asano JK, Barber SA, Chan SY, et al. The Genome sequence of the SAS-associated coronavirus. Science 2003;300:1399–1404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, Nix WA, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP, Penaranda S, Bankamp B, Maher K, Chen MH, et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003;300:1394–1399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Snijder EJ, Bredenbeek PJ, Dobbe JC, Thiel V, Ziebuhr J, Poon LL, Guan Y, Rozanov M, Spaan WJ, Gorbalenya AE. Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus Group 2 lineage. J Mol Biol 2003;331:991–1004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Herrewegh AA, Vennema H, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ, de Groot RJ. The molecular genetics of feline coronaviruses: comparative sequence analysis of the ORF7a/7b transcription unit of different biotypes. Virology 1995;212:622–631.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Paul PS, Vaughn EM, Halbur PG. Pathogenicity and sequence analysis studies suggest potential role of gene 3 in virulence of swine enteric and respiratory coronaviruses. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;412:317–321.[Medline]
  9. Tan YJ, Teng E, Shen S, Tan TH, Goh PY, Fielding BC, Ooi EE, Tan HC, Lim SG, Hong W. A novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein, U274, is transported to the cell surface and undergoes endocytosis. J Virol 2004;78:6723–6734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yu CJ, Chen YC, Hsiao CH, Kuo TC, Chang SC, Lu CY, Wei WC, Lee CH, Huang LM, Chang MF, et al. Identification of a novel protein 3a from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. FEBS Lett 2004;565:111–116.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Zeng R, Yang RF, Shi MD, Jiang MR, Xie YH, Ruan HQ, Jiang XS, Shi L, Zhou H, Zhang L, et al. Characterization of the 3a protein of SARS-associated coronavirus in infected vero E6 cells and SARS patients. J Mol Biol 2004;341:271–279.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Yuan X, Li J, Shan Y, Yang Z, Zhao Z, Chen B, Yao Z, Dong B, Wang S, Chen J, et al. Subcellular localization and membrane association of SARS-CoV 3a protein. Virus Res 2005;109:191–202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ito N, Mossel EC, Narayanan K, Popov VL, Huang C, Inoue T, Peters CJ, Makino S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3a protein is a viral structural protein. J Virol 2005;79:3182–3186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shen S, Lin PS, Chao YC, Zhang A, Yang X, Lim SG, Hong W, Tan YJ. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3a is a novel structural protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;330:286–292.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Deng LW, Chiu I, Strominger JL. MLL 5 protein forms intranuclear foci, and overexpression inhibits cell cycle progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:757–762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yuan X, Cong Y, Hao J, Shan Y, Zhao Z, Wang S, Chen J. Regulation of LIP level and ROS formation through interaction of H-ferritin with G-CSF receptor. J Mol Biol 2004;339:131–144.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Zhang Y, Li T, Fu L, Yu C, Li Y, Xu X, Wang Y, Ning H, Zhang S, Chen W, et al. Silencing SARS-CoV Spike protein expression in cultured cells by RNA interference. FEBS Lett 2004;27:141–146.
  18. Chen CJ, Sugiyama K, Kubo H, Huang C, Makino S. Murine coronavirus nonstructural protein p28 arrest cell cycle in G0/G1 phase. J Virol 2004;78:10410–10419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gemeniano MC, Sawai ET, Sparger EE. Feline immunodeficiency virus Orf-A localizes to the nucleus and induces cell cycle arrest. Virology 2004;325:167–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Chen CJ, Makino S. Murine coronavirus replication induces cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase. J Virol 2004;78:5658–5669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Locker JK, Rose JK, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ. Membrane assembly of the triple-spanning coronavirus M protein. Individual transmembrane domains show preferred orientation. J Biol Chem 1992;267:21911–21918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Maeda J, Repass JF, Maeda A, Makino S. Membrane topology of coronavirus E protein. Virology 2001;281:163–169.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Connell-Crowley L, Harper JW, Goodrich DW. Cyclin D1/Cdk4 regulates retinoblastoma protein-mediated cell cycle arrest by site-specific phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell 1997;8:287–301.[Abstract]
  24. Lin J, Jinno S, Okayama H. Cdk6-cyclin D3 complex evades inhibition by inhibitor proteins and uniquely controls cell's proliferation competence. Oncogene 2001;20:2000–2009.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Zhu X, Kwon CH, Schlosshauer PW, Ellenson LH, Baker SJ. PTEN induces G(1) cell cycle arrest and decreases cyclin D3 levels in endometrial carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:4569–4575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ausserlechner MJ, Obexer P, Bock G, Geley S, Kofler R. Cyclin D3 and c-MYC control glucocorticoid-induced cell cycle arrest but not apoptosis in lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Cell Death Differ 2004;11:165–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Naniche D, Reed SI, Oldstone MB. Cell cycle arrest during measles virus infection: a G0-like block leads to suppression of retinoblastoma protein expression. J Virol 1999;73:1894–1901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Chen CJ, Makino S. Murine coronavirus-induced apoptosis in 17Cl-1 cells involves a mitochondria-mediated pathway and its downstream caspase-8 activation and bid cleavage. Virology 2002;302:321–332.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
K. Padhan, R. Minakshi, M. A. B. Towheed, and S. Jameel
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3a protein activates the mitochondrial death pathway through p38 MAP kinase activation
J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2008; 89(8): 1960 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2005-0345RCv1
37/1/9    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cong, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, X.
Right arrow Articles by Cong, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society.