help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Published ahead of print on August 23, 2007, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2007-0252OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0252OCv1
38/2/185    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stinchcombe, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Maden, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stinchcombe, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Maden, M.
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. Vol. 38, pp. 185-191, 2008
© 2008 American Thoracic Society
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0252OC

Retinoic Acid–Induced Alveolar Regeneration

Critical Differences in Strain Sensitivity

Siân V. Stinchcombe1 and Malcolm Maden1

1 M.R.C. Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Siân V. Stinchcombe, MA, BM, BCh, M.R.C. Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, 4th Floor, New, Hunt's House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London SE1 1UL, UK. E-mail: sian.stinchcombe{at}kcl.ac.uk


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In emphysema, the lung cannot spontaneously regenerate lost alveolar tissue. Treatment with retinoic acid (RA) in rodent models of emphysema induces alveolar regeneration. However, some animal studies have failed to show regeneration when using different species and strains. We have previously shown that dexamethasone (Dex) treatment of newborn TO outbred strain mice permanently disrupts alveolar development. Later RA treatment restores alveolar architecture to normal. To determine whether this model of alveolar regeneration is strain specific, our protocol was repeated with two new outbred mouse strains. ICR and NIHS mice received Dex from Postnatal Days 4 to P15 (P4– P15). From P46 to P57, mice received RA (2 mg/kg) or vehicle. An additional ICR group received 5x RA (10 mg/kg) from P46 to P57. Control groups received vehicle at both treatment points. All mice were killed at P90 and lung morphology analyzed. Dex-treated ICR and NIHS mice showed increased mean alveolar chord length (Lm) and reduced alveolar surface area (SA) and SA/lung volume (SA/LV) compared with controls. RA-treated NIHS mice showed return of Lm, SA, and SA/LV toward control values, indicating alveolar regeneration. ICR RA group mice did not regenerate, but 5x RA mice showed Lm, SA, and SA/LV values consistent with alveolar regeneration. In conclusion, the Dex-treated mouse model of emphysema is robust and repeatable in different strains. RA-induced alveolar regeneration is not a strain-specific phenomenon. RA dose threshold for inducing alveolar regeneration is higher in ICR mice, suggesting a difference in retinoid pharmacokinetics between strains. These results provide a possible explanation for previous failed studies of RA-induced alveolar regeneration.

Key Words: alveolar regeneration • dexamethasone • mouse strains • pharmacokinetics • retinoic acid



   CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Retinoic acid–induced alveolar regeneration is not strain or sex dependent, but dose threshold can vary significantly between strains. This could explain previous failed regeneration studies and so broaden basic research approaches to future therapeutic translation.

 
Adequate alveolar surface area (SA) is essential for the lungs to perform their primary function of gas exchange. In emphysema, irreversible alveolar destruction causes progressive loss of gas-exchanging SA and elastic recoil (1). In bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) the developmental process of alveolar septation is disrupted, resulting in reduced alveolar SA, which fails to fully recover in early life (2). No treatments are currently available for either condition to restore the alveolar SA toward normal.

A landmark paper by Massaro and Massaro in 1997 (3) demonstrated that retinoic acid (RA) can induce alveolar regeneration in a rat model of emphysema. In this study, intratracheal elastase caused irreversible destruction of alveoli, but after subsequent treatment with RA alveolar size, number and SA were restored to normal. This observation raised significant hope of clinical translation into future human therapy. RA is known to be involved in developmental alveologenesis (4–7), and studies of vitamin A deficiency indicate a role for RA in the maintenance of alveolar structure in the adult lung (8). There is also growing evidence that the signals regulating innate programs of alveolar loss and regeneration are conserved between rodents and humans (9–11).

A recent feasibility study for retinoid treatment in human emphysema (12) demonstrated that all-trans-RA (atRA) and 13-cis-RA were well tolerated by patients. Although the study was not powered to show clinical benefit from treatment, and lacked a true placebo group for long-term follow-ups, patients in the group with highest plasma levels of atRA showed delayed improvements in DLCO and health-related quality-of-life. A larger trial with long-term follow-up is now needed to determine whether RA can induce alveolar regeneration and produce measurable clinical improvement in patients with emphysema. Other retinoids and RA receptor–specific agonists may also be considered as candidates for future clinical trials.

In the decade since RA-induced alveolar regeneration was discovered, 13 further studies have aimed to replicate this phenomenon in a range of animal models of emphysema. Of these studies, seven have succeeded (5, 13–17) and six have failed (18–23) to show a beneficial effect of RA on alveolar morphology. In all cases, the atRA dose was between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg. No ready explanation for these negative studies has been shown, and the apparent lack of repeatability has called into question the broader translational potential of this area of research. However, several factors may have played a role in the failed studies.

It is particularly notable that all successful studies in rats employed the same animal strain (3, 13, 16, 17). Mouse studies have shown alveolar regeneration in two strains (5, 14–16), but failed in three others (19, 21). Trials of RA in single strains of rabbit (23) and guinea pig (22) showed no beneficial effect. One might conclude from this that RA-induced alveolar regeneration is an isolated phenomenon in a few rodent strains, and unlikely to translate into human therapy.

In this work, we have addressed the question of possible strain dependence. We have previously shown that RA induces alveolar regeneration in outbred TO strain mice using the dexamethasone (Dex)-treated mouse model (5). Here we have repeated our protocol using two different outbred mouse strains and assessed the effects of RA on their alveolar morphology.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Animals
The mice used were of the outbred NIHS and outbred ICR (CD-1) strains (Harlan UK, Bicester, UK). Late-term pregnant female mice of both strains were bought, and both male and female pups were used from all litters. Postnatal Day 1 (P1) was defined as the day of birth, and therefore a P4 mouse pup was 72 hours old. Animals were allowed food and water ad libitum, and maintained on a 12:12 hour light-dark cycle.

Study Design and Dosing
NIHS mice were divided equally into three groups: Control, Dex, and RA. ICR mice were divided equally into four groups: Control, Dex, RA, and 5x RA. Dex, RA, and 5x RA group animals received Dex (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 40 µg/ml, given as a daily 10-µl subcutaneous injection for 10 days from P4 to P15, with a 2-day break on P9 and P10. Control group animals received the vehicle only. Four weeks later, all animal groups received further treatment for 10 days from P42 to P53, with a 2-day break on P47 and P48. RA group animals received atRA (Sigma) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma) and peanut oil (Sigma) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml, administered intraperitoneally daily as 1 µl per g body weight. 5x RA group animals received atRA in DMSO and peanut oil at a concentration of 5 mg/ml, given intraperitoneally daily as 2 µl per g body weight. Dex and Control group animals received vehicle only, given intraperitoneally daily as 1 µl per g body weight. The 2-day break in dosing was an attempt to prevent full induction of the CYP enzymes, which catabolize retinoids and would therefore reduce the efficacy of the administered atRA. All animals were killed at P90.

Histology and Morphometry
The animals were weighed. The lungs were then carefully removed from the thorax and the trachea intubated with a 22-gauge cannula. The lungs were inflated to a standard pressure of 20 cm H2O with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, after which the trachea was ligated and the tissue placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for a minimum of 48 hours. The lungs were then washed in distilled water, placed in 30% alcohol to equilibrate with the hilum open, and the lung volumes (LV) measured by fluid displacement. The lungs were then processed, embedded in paraffin wax, and 8-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Sections were analyzed on a light microscope linked to a digital imaging system. Images were acquired at 10x objective and processed using Image ProPlus software (Data-Cell Ltd, Finchampstead, UK) to calculate the alveolar mean chord length (Lm). Five nonoverlapping fields per section from six sections were analyzed for each animal. Following Weibel (24), knowledge of the Lm and LV allows gas-exchanging surface area (SA) and the surface-to-volume ratio (SA/LV) to be calculated. All parameters are expressed as group mean values ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences between groups was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. The % Lm recovery was calculated compared with the Dex group mean value as a proportion of the possible range of response by [(Dex Lm – RA Lm) ÷ (Dex Lm – Control Lm)] x 100. Similarly, % SA/LV recovery was calculated as [(RA SA/LV – Dex SA/LV) ÷ (Control SA/LV – Dex SA/LV)] x 100.


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 References
 
NIHS Strain
Using the protocol previously developed in TO strain mice to generate an experimental model of emphysema and alveolar regeneration (5), NIHS strain mice were divided into three groups (RA, Dex, and Control), and received Dex followed by atRA, Dex followed by vehicle, or PBS followed by vehicle, respectively. No significant differences in group mean LV, mean body weight (Wt), or mean LV/Wt ratio were seen between groups (Table 1) at P90.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. LUNG PARAMETERS MEASURED IN NIHS STRAIN MICE

 
The 11 Control animals showed alveolar histology and morphometry that were indistinguishable from normal uninjected mice (not shown), confirming that the vehicles used had no biological effect. A typical Control lung is shown in Figure 1A.


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Typical histologic images of lungs from NIHS strain mice. (A) Control group: PBS- and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/oil-treated lung. (B) Dex group: Dex- and DMSO/oil-treated lung. (C) Retinoic acid (RA) group: Dex- and all-trans-RA (atRA)-treated lung. Morphologic differences between A, B, and C are clear and in accord with quantitative data in Table 1 and Figure 2.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Graphs of (A) Lm (in µm) and (B) SA/LV (in cm2/cm3) in NIHS strain mice for Control (dark gray bars), Dex (light gray bars), and RA (hatched bars) groups. Values are group means. Error bars = SEM.

 
Eight animals were included in the Dex group and showed markedly different alveolar morphology from Control animals, with fewer, larger alveoli (Figure 1B). Mean alveolar Lm was increased by 24% from 67.9 to 84.4 µm (P < 0.001) (Table 1, Figures 1 and 2A). Mean alveolar SA was reduced by 12% (P = 0.012) and the mean alveolar SA/LV ratio was reduced by 19% from 589.8 to 476.0 cm2/cm3 (P < 0.001) (Table 1, Figure 2B).


Figure 3
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Typical histologic appearances of lungs from ICR strain mice. (A) Control group: PBS- and DMSO/oil-treated lung. (B) Dex group: Dex- and DMSO/oil-treated lung. (C) RA group: Dex- and 2 mg/kg atRA-treated lung. (D) 5x RA group: Dex- and 10 mg/kg atRA-treated lung. Morphologic differences between A and B, B and D, and C and D are clear and in accord with quantitative data in Table 2 and Figure 4.

 
A group of eight animals received atRA and displayed alveolar histology more similar to Control than to Dex group animals (Figure 1). Mean Lm for the RA group was 75.1 µm, which represents a 56% recovery from the Dex group mean of 84.4 µm (P = 0.004) (Table 1, Figure 2A). This average value hides the variation of response to atRA between individual animals. Of the eight animals in the group, two regenerated completely (defined as a Lm of 65–71 µm), three showed a partial response (defined as Lm 71–76 µm), and three failed to show any morphologic response (defined as Lm > 76 µm). This gives a 25% regeneration rate, 38% partial response rate, and 63% overall response rate in the NIHS strain in response to atRA.

Mean alveolar SA was increased by 30% to 370.4 cm2 in the RA group compared with the Dex group mean SA of 356.1 cm2 (Table 1), but this improvement failed to reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). However, mean SA/LV was significantly increased to 535.3 cm2/cm3 in the RA group compared with the Dex group mean of 476.0 cm2/cm3 (P = 0.005) (Table 1, Figure 2B). This represents a 48% recovery of mean SA/LV in atRA-treated NIHS strain mice.

ICR Strain
ICR strain mice were divided into four groups: Control, Dex, RA, and 5x RA. At P90, no significant difference in LV was seen between groups. Mean Wt was similar for Control, Dex, and 5x RA groups, but was lower in the RA group (P < 0.005 for comparisons with all other groups). LV/Wt ratio was therefore higher in the RA group than in all other groups (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. LUNG PARAMETERS MEASURED IN ICR STRAIN MICE

 
Lung histology and morphometry of the 12 Control group animals was indistinguishable from normal uninjected mice (not shown), confirming that both vehicles used had no biological effect in ICR strain mice (Figures 3A, 4A, and 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 4. Graphs of (A) Lm (in µm) and (B) SA/LV (in cm2/cm3) in ICR strain mice for Control (dark gray bars), Dex (light gray bars), RA (hatched bars), and 5x RA (solid bars) groups. Values are group means. Error bars = SEM.

 
The Dex group contained 13 animals, and histology showed evidence of inhibited postnatal alveolar septation, with fewer, larger alveoli than Controls (Figure 3B). The group mean Lm was increased by 54% from 65.1 to 100.4 µm (P < 0.001) by Dex treatment, with a concomitant 43% fall in mean SA from 560.8 to 319.8 cm2 (P < 0.001), and 34% reduction in alveolar mean SA/LV from 615.2 to 407.1 cm2/cm3 (P < 0.001) compared with the Control group (Table 2, Figures 4A and 4B).

Eleven animals received a standard 2 mg/kg daily dose of atRA in the RA group. Histology was indistinguishable from Dex group animals (Figure 3C) and morphometric analysis gave a mean Lm of 110.5 µm, a mean SA of 316.8 cm2, and a mean SA/LV of 364.7 cm2/cm3 (Figures 4A and 4B). For each parameter, comparison with the Dex group mean failed to reach statistical significance. However, comparison with Control group means showed highly statistically significant differences in Lm (70% increase), SA (44% reduction), and SA/LV (41% reduction) (P < 0.001 for all parameters). These RA group results are consistent with successful inhibition of postnatal alveolar septation by Dex treatment, but failure of subsequent atRA 2 mg/kg treatment to induce alveolar regeneration.

A fourth group of 11 animals received an increased daily dose of 10 mg/kg atRA (i.e., a 5-fold increase of the standard dose). Histology in this 5x RA group typically showed a more complex alveolar structure, with more numerous, smaller alveoli than either the Dex or RA group animals, and similar to appearances in the Control group (Figure 3). Compared with the Dex group, the 5x RA group mean Lm was recovered by 52% from 100.4 to 81.9 µm (P < 0.001), SA recovered by 37% from 319.8 to 409.5 cm2 (P < 0.001), and SA/LV recovered by 41% from 407.1 to 492.5 cm2/cm3 (P < 0.001) (Table 2, Figures 4A and 4B).

Again, these group mean values hide the range of variable individual response to 5x RA. When individual values of Lm are considered, three animals regenerated completely (defined as Lm 65–75 µm), five showed a partial response (defined as Lm 75–86 µm), and three failed to show any morphologic change (Lm > 86 µm). (The boundary values for these definitions have been adjusted to take into account the greater magnitude of change in Lm between Control and Dex group ICR strain mice.) This gives a 27% regeneration rate, 45% partial response rate, and an overall combined response rate of 72%.

Male and Female ICR Strain
Male and female mice were included in all experimental groups for both outbred mouse strains. Since group sizes were larger in the ICR study, male and female results can be analyzed separately to determine whether the response to treatment differs between sexes.

The mean alveolar Lm in Control animals at P90 was almost identical in male and female animals (Table 3). There was also a similar magnitude of increase in Lm in the Dex group for both sexes. Neither sex showed a significant recovery of Lm in response to standard dose atRA treatment. Both male and female 5x RA group mean Lm values fell in comparison to Dex group means, representing a 50% recovery in males and a 55% recovery in females. While this reduction was statistically significant for male animals (P = 0.001), it failed to reach statistical significance for females (P = 0.229). Analysis of response rates (using Lm values as above) for females showed 40% regeneration (n = 2) and 40% partial response (n = 2), giving an overall response rate of 80%. Male animals showed 17% regeneration (n = 1) and 50% partial response (n = 3), giving an overall response rate of 67%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. LUNG PARAMETERS IN MALE AND FEMALE ICR STRAIN MICE

 
Absolute values of mean SA and mean SA/LV in each treatment group differed between males and females (Table 3). However, in both sexes Dex treatment was seen to reduce mean SA and mean SA/LV, standard atRA treatment produced similar values to the Dex group, and 5x RA treatment yielded sizeable increases in both SA and SA/LV. While this improvement in SA was statistically significant for females (P = 0.004), male values failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.058). The 5x RA group mean SA/LV was 40% recovered in males and 43% recovered in females. This recovery of SA/LV was statistically significant in males (P < 0.001), but nonsignificant in females (P = 0.154).


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
References
 
RA Induces Alveolar Regeneration in Different Mouse Strains
We have used the Dex-treated mouse model to determine whether RA-induced alveolar regeneration is a strain-dependent phenomenon. When administered to rats and mice in the developmentally critical first 2 weeks after birth, Dex inhibits alveologenesis, and this deleterious effect cannot be spontaneously corrected later in life (5, 25, 26). As a result, animals have fewer, larger alveoli and reduced gas-exchanging surface area. Dex acts via nuclear receptors and is likely to invoke multiple mechanisms to inhibit alveologenesis. Microarray data from postnatal rat lungs has shown that Dex down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) expression (27). Dex may also interfere with RA signaling during this critical period, since it reduces expression of RA receptor β (RARβ) (28), cellular retinol binding protein I (CRBPI), and cellular retinoic acid–binding protein I (CRABPI) (29) in vivo, and halves the amount of RA released by lipid-laden fibroblasts in vitro (30).

We have previously developed a robust and repeatable model of disrupted alveolar development in outbred TO strain mice (5). In the current study, use of our established protocol for Dex treatment in outbred NIHS and ICR strain mice resulted in typical appearances of inhibited alveologenesis, with fewer, larger alveoli, thin alveolar walls, increased Lm value, and reduced alveolar SA and SA/LV (Tables 1 and 2; Figures 1B, 2, 3B, and 4). The degree of Dex effect in ICR mice was comparable with that previously seen in TO mice (5, 15). NIHS mice showed a smaller absolute morphologic effect of Dex (Table 1, Figure 2A), but statistically the difference between Dex and Control group animals was clear-cut.

atRA (2 mg/kg) successfully induced alveolar regeneration in NIHS strain mice, with a 56% recovery of Lm and 48% recovery of SA/LV (Table 1; Figures 1 and 2). These figures and the animal response rate of 63% (based on individual Lm values) are similar to those recorded in TO mice in response to atRA (15).

By contrast, ICR strain mice failed to regenerate when treated with a standard 2 mg/kg dose of atRA (Table 2; Figures 3C and 4A). If the experiment had stopped at this point, we would have reported a negative result for this strain. However, when the atRA dose was increased 5-fold to 10 mg/kg, alveolar regeneration was successfully induced, with a 52% recovery of Lm and 41% recovery of SA/LV. The response rate, based on individual Lm values, was 72%. Again, these quantitative measures of alveolar regeneration compare favorably with previously reported TO strain figures (15). The 5-fold increase in atRA dose was chosen based on our understanding of in vivo retinoid pharmacokinetics and our experience of frequent toxic events with a 10-fold increase in dose (data not shown).

We can conclude from these results that RA-induced alveolar regeneration is not an isolated, strain-dependent phenomenon. Regeneration has now been demonstrated using the Dex-treated mouse model in four mouse strains (NIHS, ICR, TO [5, 15], and C57BL/6 [14–16]).

Retinoid Metabolism May Vary between Strains
It is also apparent from our results that the dose threshold for regeneration can differ between strains. ICR mice required a significantly higher dose of atRA for treatment effect to be seen (Tables 1 and 2). This is likely to reflect a difference in retinoid pharmacokinetics. ICR mice have a high incidence of ocular retinal degeneration. Although this observation has not been fully explained in the literature, since retinoid metabolism plays an integral role in photoreceptor function, and human retinal degeneration can result from accumulation of retinoid metabolic products (31), it is tempting to suggest that outbred ICR strain mice have an inherited abnormality of retinoid metabolism. If so, this may also explain our results.

The pharmacokinetics of retinoids can vary considerably among species, due to differences in bioavailability, volume of distribution, clearance rate, and metabolism. This can result in very different systemic exposures from seemingly equivalent doses. Such differences between animal strains might explain the previous reports of failed alveolar regeneration in response to atRA, since these studies all employed similar doses within a narrow range. With this in mind, it would be wise for future studies to incorporate a broader range of atRA doses to definitively determine whether alveolar regeneration can be induced in the model used.

Evidence of Alveolar Regeneration in Male and Female Mice
Recent studies of alveolar sexual dimorphism indicate that regulation of alveolar formation and maintenance is more complex in females than males (32–36). A number of investigators have therefore chosen to use a single sex of animals in trials of RA-induced alveolar regeneration (3, 13, 14, 16–20, 22, 23). When male rats or mice were used, regeneration succeeded (3, 13, 16, 17) with the exception of one rat study conducted at altitude (20). In contrast, both female-only mouse studies failed (18, 19). This might suggest that female rodents are unable to regenerate in response to RA. However, two of the published positive studies included both sexes (5, 15).

To examine any sex-related difference in response to RA, ICR results were analyzed separately for males and females. Observation of individual mice in the 5x RA group showed clear histologic evidence of alveolar regeneration in several mice of both sexes. When these changes were quantified, the degree of response to atRA was similar for both sexes (Table 3). However, the difference between the mean values of Lm and SA/LV for female Dex and 5x RA groups failed to reach statistical significance, unlike the male groups. This appears to be due to a greater variance of individual values in these female groups (Table 3), and may simply reflect the small group sizes. It might also raise the possibility that the estrogen axis interacts with Dex and atRA treatment effects.

NIHS strain female mice in the RA group showed a statistically significant reduction of mean Lm compared with female Dex group mice (P < 0.001), a regeneration rate of 40%, a partial response rate of 60%, and overall response rate of 100% (n = 5, data not shown).

These results indicate that RA-induced alveolar regeneration can occur in both male and female mice.

Other variables may also explain the published failures of alveolar regeneration, such as age at time of atRA treatment. Alveolar regeneration may represent a recapitulation of postnatal developmental alveolar septation, and as such, could be an age-restricted phenomenon. Animal age at the time of atRA treatment was not stated in all studies. However, animals in successful mouse studies (5, 14–16) were significantly younger than those in failed studies (18, 21). Further experiments at increasing age will be required to resolve this issue. It is also noteworthy that two of the negative studies were conducted in centers at high altitude (18, 21). Hypoxia inhibits alveologenesis in newborn rats (37–40), and so relative hypoxia may explain why C57BL/6 mice failed to regenerate in Denver (18) but succeeded at sea level in London (15), Washington (16), and Sendai, Japan (14). However, the fact that developmental alveologenesis was not impaired in these mice before treatment could argue against this hypothesis.

It could be argued that the Dex-treated mouse model is more directly applicable to BPD than emphysema, since the "emphysematous" lung phenotype is generated by inhibition of normal development rather than alveolar destruction. However, Dex-treated mice develop more homogeneous enlargement of alveoli than elastase-treated animals, and therefore could be said to provide a better substrate to assess the morphologic treatment effects of RA. Rather than attaching a parallel clinical label, it may be seen as a robust and repeatable model to investigate the basic mechanisms of alveolar septation.

In summary, we have shown that RA-induced alveolar regeneration is neither strain- nor sex-dependent. We have also provided a possible explanation for previously reported failures of alveolar regeneration. Our results support the theory that mechanisms of alveolar formation, maintenance, and regeneration are conserved between strains and species. Further work, to uncover the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved, promises to unlock the potential for therapeutic induction of alveolar regeneration or rescue of failed alveologenesis in humans in the future.


   Footnotes
 
This work was funded by the Medical Research Council via a M.R.C. Clinical Research Training Fellowship to S.V.S.

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0252OC on August 23, 2007

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form July 2, 2007

Accepted in final form August 9, 2007


   References
Top
 Abstract
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Thurlbeck WM, Muller NL. Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1017–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Coalson JJ. Pathology of new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Neonatol 2003;8:73–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Massaro GD, Massaro D. Retinoic acid treatment abrogates elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema in rats. Nat Med 1997;3:675–677.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Massaro GD, Massaro D. Postnatal treatment with retinoic acid increases the number of pulmonary alveoli in rats. Am J Physiol 1996;270:L305–L310.[Medline]
  5. Hind M, Maden M. Retinoic acid induces alveolar regeneration in the adult mouse lung. Eur Respir J 2004;23:20–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McGowan SE, Harvey CS, Jackson SK. Retinoids, retinoic acid receptors, and cytoplasmic retinoid binding proteins in perinatal rat lung fibroblasts. Am J Physiol 1995;269:L463–L472.[Medline]
  7. Hind M, Corcoran J, Maden M. Alveolar proliferation, retinoid synthesizing enzymes, and endogenous retinoids in the postnatal mouse lung: different roles for Aldh-1 and Raldh-2. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:67–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Baybutt RC, Hu L, Molteni A. Vitamin A deficiency injures lung and liver parenchyma and impairs function of rat type II pneumocytes. J Nutr 2000;130:1159–1165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Massaro GD, Radaeva S, Clerch LB, Massaro D. Lung alveoli: endogenous programmed destruction and regeneration. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;283:L305–L309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cook VJ, Coxson HO, Mason AG, Bai TR. Bullae, bronchiectasis and nutritional emphysema in severe anorexia nervosa. Can Respir J 2001;8:361–365.[Medline]
  11. Coxson HO, Chan IH, Mayo JR, Hlynsky J, Nakano Y, Birmingham CL. Early emphysema in patients with anorexia nervosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:748–752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Roth MD, Connett JE, D'Armiento JM, Foronjy RF, Friedman PJ, Goldin JG, Louis TA, Mao JT, Muindi JR, O'Connor GT, et al. Feasibility of retinoids for the treatment of emphysema study. Chest 2006;130:1334–1345.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Belloni PN, Garvin L, Mao CP, Bailey-Healy I, Leaffer D. Effects of all-trans-retinoic acid in promoting alveolar repair. Chest 2000;117:235S–241S.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ishizawa K, Kubo H, Yamada M, Kobayashi S, Numasaki M, Ueda S, Suzuki T, Sasaki H. Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to lung regeneration after elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema. FEBS Lett 2004;556:249–252.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Maden M. Retinoids have differing efficacies on alveolar regeneration in a dexamethasone treated mouse. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;35:260–267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Massaro GD, Massaro D. Retinoic acid treatment partially rescues failed septation in rats and in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;278:L955–L960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tepper J, Pfeiffer J, Aldrich M, Tumas D, Kern J, Hoffman E, McLennan G, Hyde D. Can retinoic acid ameliorate the physiologic and morphologic effects of elastase instillation in the rat? Chest 2000;117:242S–244S.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Fujita M, Ye Q, Ouchi H, Nakashima N, Hamada N, Hagimoto N, Kuwano K, Mason RJ, Nakanishi Y. Retinoic acid fails to reverse emphysema in adult mouse models. Thorax 2004;59:224–230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lucey EC, Goldstein RH, Breuer R, Rexer BN, Ong DE, Snider GL. Retinoic acid does not affect alveolar septation in adult FVB mice with elastase-induced emphysema. Respiration 2003;70:200–205.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. March TH, Cossey PY, Esparza DC, Dix KJ, McDonald JD, Bowen LE. Inhalation administration of all-trans-retinoic acid for treatment of elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema in Fischer 344 rats. Exp Lung Res 2004;30:383–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. March TH, Bowen LE, Finch GL, Nikula KJ, Wayne BJ, Hobbs CH. Effects of strain and treatment with inhaled aII-trans-retinoic acid on cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary emphysema in mice. COPD 2005;2:289–302.[Medline]
  22. Meshi B, Vitalis TZ, Ionescu D, Elliott WM, Liu CX, Wang XD, Hayashi S, Hogg JC. Emphysematous lung destruction by cigarette smoke: the effects of latent adenoviral infection on the lung inflammatory response. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:52–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nishi Y, Boswell V, Ansari T, Piprawala F, Satchi S, Page CP. Elastase-induced changes in lung function: relationship to morphometry and effect of drugs. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2003;16:221–229.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Weibel ER. Morphometry of the human lung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1963.
  25. Massaro D, Teich N, Maxwell S, Massaro GD, Whitney P. Postnatal development of alveoli. Regulation and evidence for a critical period in rats. J Clin Invest 1985;76:1297–1305.[Medline]
  26. Garber SJ, Zhang H, Foley JP, Zhao H, Butler SJ, Godinez RI, Godinez MH, Gow AJ, Savani RC. Hormonal regulation of alveolarization: structure-function correlation. Respir Res 2006;7:47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Clerch LB, Baras AS, Massaro GD, Hoffman EP, Massaro D. DNA microarray analysis of neonatal mouse lung connects regulation of KDR with dexamethasone-induced inhibition of alveolar formation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004;286:L411–L419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. McMenamy KR, Anderson MJ, Zachman RD. Effect of dexamethasone and oxygen exposure on neonatal rat lung retinoic acid receptor proteins. Pediatr Pulmonol 1994;18:232–238.[Medline]
  29. Whitney D, Massaro GD, Massaro D, Clerch LB. Gene expression of cellular retinoid-binding proteins: modulation by retinoic acid and dexamethasone in postnatal rat lung. Pediatr Res 1999;45:2–7.[Medline]
  30. Dirami G, Massaro GD, Clerch LB, Ryan US, Reczek PR, Massaro D. Lung retinol storing cells synthesize and secrete retinoic acid, an inducer of alveolus formation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004;286:L249–L256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Thompson DA, Gal A. Vitamin A metabolism in the retinal pigment epithelium: genes, mutations, and diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:683–703.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Massaro D, Massaro GD. Estrogen regulates pulmonary alveolar formation, loss, and regeneration in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004;287:L1154–L1159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Massaro D, Massaro GD. Estrogen receptor regulation of pulmonary alveolar dimensions: alveolar sexual dimorphism in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006;290:L866–L870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Massaro D, Clerch LB, Massaro GD. Estrogen receptor alpha regulates pulmonary alveolar loss and regeneration in female mice: Morphometric and gene expression studies. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007;292:L1313–L1326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Massaro GD, Mortola JP, Massaro D. Estrogen modulates the dimensions of the lung's gas-exchange surface area and alveoli in female rats. Am J Physiol 1996;270:L110–L114.[Medline]
  36. Massaro GD, Mortola JP, Massaro D. Sexual dimorphism in the architecture of the lung's gas-exchange region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:1105–1107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Blanco LN, Massaro D, Massaro GD. Alveolar size, number, and surface area: developmentally dependent response to 13% O2. Am J Physiol 1991;261:L370–L377.[Medline]
  38. Massaro GD, Olivier J, Massaro D. Short-term perinatal 10% O2 alters postnatal development of lung alveoli. Am J Physiol 1989;257:L221–L225.[Medline]
  39. Mortola JP, Xu LJ, Lauzon AM. Body growth, lung and heart weight, and DNA content in newborn rats exposed to different levels of chronic hypoxia. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990;68:1590–1594.[Medline]
  40. Mortola JP, Morgan CA, Virgona V. Respiratory adaptation to chronic hypoxia in newborn rats. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:1329–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A.-K. T. Perl and E. Gale
FGF signaling is required for myofibroblast differentiation during alveolar regeneration
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): L299 - L308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
M Hind, A Gilthorpe, S Stinchcombe, and M Maden
Retinoid induction of alveolar regeneration: from mice to man?
Thorax, May 1, 2009; 64(5): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
P. J. Barnes
Emerging Pharmacotherapies for COPD
Chest, December 1, 2008; 134(6): 1278 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
L Plantier, C Rochette-Egly, D Goven, A Boutten, M Bonay, G Leseche, M Fournier, B Crestani, and J Boczkowski
Dysregulation of elastin expression by fibroblasts in pulmonary emphysema: role of cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2
Thorax, November 1, 2008; 63(11): 1012 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0252OCv1
38/2/185    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stinchcombe, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Maden, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stinchcombe, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Maden, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society.