Published ahead of print on August 28, 2008, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2006-0444OC
© 2009 American Thoracic Society DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0444OC Role of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Channel in Human Airway Smooth Muscle1 Seymour Heisler Laboratory of the Montreal Chest Institute and Meakins-Christie Laboratories, McGill University; 2 Physiology Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and 3 University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to James G. Martin, M.D., D.Sc., Meakins Christie Laboratories, Department of Medicine, McGill University, 3626 St. Urbain, Montreal, PQ, H2X 2P2 Canada. E-mail: james.martin{at}mcgill.ca
Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) suffer from asthma-like symptoms and gastrointestinal cramps, attributed to a mutation in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene present in a variety of cells. Pulmonary manifestations of the disease include the production of thickened mucus and symptoms of asthma, such as cough and wheezing. A possible alteration in airway smooth muscle (ASM) cell function of patients with CF has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the (CFTR) channel is present and affects function of human ASM cells. Cell cultures were obtained from the main or lobar bronchi of patients with and without CF, and the presence of the CFTR channel detected by immunofluorescence. Cytosolic Ca2+ was measured using Fura-2 and dual-wavelength microfluorimetry. The results show that CFTR is expressed in airway bronchial tissue and in cultured ASM cells. Peak Ca2+ release in response to histamine was significantly decreased in CF cells compared with non-CF ASM cells (357 ± 53 nM versus 558 ± 20 nM; P < 0.001). The CFTR pharmacological blockers, glibenclamide and N-phenyl anthranilic acid, significantly reduced histamine-induced Ca2+ release in non-CF cells, and similar results were obtained when CFTR expression was varied using antisense oligonucleotides. In conclusion, these data show that the CFTR channel is present in ASM cells, and that it modulates the release of Ca2+ in response to contractile agents. In patients with CF, a dysfunctional CFTR channel could contribute to the asthma diathesis and gastrointestinal problems experienced by these patients.
Key Words: cystic fibrosis histamine chloride channel glibenclamide oligodeoxynucleotide
A substantial fraction of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has symptoms of asthma, such as cough and wheezing, and demonstrates airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine and/or methacholine (1, 2). Although these manifestations may be partly due to epithelial abnormalities, there is a growing consensus that airway hyperresponsiveness mainly reflects airway smooth muscle (ASM) dysfunction (3). Indeed, ASM cells from patients with asthma have been studied and shown to differ from individuals without asthma (4). However, the ASM cells from patients with CF have not, to our knowledge, been investigated. In addition, although consequences of a loss of function of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel have been investigated extensively in epithelial cells, little is known about the physiological role of this channel in other cell types. The primary function of the CFTR channel is to mediate cAMP-activated Cl– conductance across the plasma membrane of epithelial cells. Consistent with this Cl– channel function, mutations in the CFTR gene lead to clinical manifestations, such as the thick mucus secretion that impairs airway clearance and obstructs ducts in the pancreas and other organs. Furthermore, additional functions have been attributed to the CFTR, including regulation of the epithelial Na+ channel and other channels and transporters (5–11). Effects of the CFTR channel on vesicle trafficking, bicarbonate transport, and the expression of inflammatory mediators, such as regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), IL-8, IL-10, and inducible nitrous oxide synthase, have also been reported (12, 13). Studies of CFTR expression indicate that it is also present in nonepithelial cell types, including lymphocytes, cardiac ventricular cells, endothelial cells, and, more recently, in rodent vascular and tracheal smooth muscle cells (14–18). Its expression in cardiac myocytes was described 10 years ago (19, 20) and, although there is some evidence for alternative splicing at exon 5, electrophysiological studies indicate that the properties of cardiac CFTR are closely similar, if not identical, to those of epithelial CFTR (21). However, the physiological function of the channel, and its possible role in modulating the contractile properties of cardiac myocytes, remain uncertain. Very recently, CFTR has been reported to modulate rodent vascular and tracheal smooth muscle relaxant responses (16–18). In precontracted arteries of rat, or tracheas of Cftr(+/+) mice, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and other CFTR activators induced vasorelaxation. Conversely, the absence of CFTR in the vascular smooth muscle cells was associated with a higher contraction in Cftr(–/–) mice, suggesting that loss or dysfunction of CFTR impairs the physiological control of vascular tone. In the present study, we investigate the possible role of CFTR Cl– channel to modulate human ASM contractility and relaxation by determining if it is present in human ASM, and whether it influences intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, a critical second messenger in smooth muscle contraction.
Cell Cultures Fragments of lobar bronchi were obtained from donors and recipients of lung transplants at the time of transplantation. The ASM cells from subjects without CF were isolated as previously described (22). Briefly, the tissue was washed thoroughly in Ca2+-free Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS), cut into 5-mm x 5-mm pieces, and digested for 90 minutes at 37°C in HBSS containing 0.4 mg/ml collagenase type IV, 1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 0.38 mg/ml elastase type IV. The resulting cell suspension was filtered through 125-µm Nytex mesh, and dissociated cells collected by centrifugation and then resuspended in 1:1 Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium/Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.244% NaHCO3, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and amphotericin (0.25 µg/ml), and plated in 25-cm2 culture flasks.
ASM cells from subjects with CF (five females and two males, all affected by the
Confluent cells were detached with a 0.025% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA solution and grown on 25-mm-diameter glass coverslips for Ca2+ imaging and immunofluorescence studies. Confluent cells from first to fourth passage were used. ASM cells in primary cultures were identified by immunostaining for smooth muscle cell–specific The project was approved by the local institutional review boards.
Immunofluorescence Studies
In tissue sections, staining was preceded by high-temperature epitope unmasking in antigen retrieval solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, ON, Canada) and permeabilization in 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were then blocked with 20% horse serum (Vector Laboratories) in universal blocking solution (Dako Cytomation, Mississauga, ON, Canada), and the anti-CFTR C-terminal monoclonal primary antibody was detected with biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG, avidin/biotin-alkaline phosphatase complex, and then developed with BCIP/NBT chromogen substrate (Vector Laboratories). Double immunostaining with anti–smooth muscle
Ca2+ Imaging
Antisense experiments.
Data are presented as means ± SEM. The Student's t test was used to compare means, and a difference was considered to be statistically significant when the P value was less than 0.05.
Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype and CFTR Expression Both CF- and non-CF–cultured ASM cells expressed smooth muscle–specific -actin. In addition, the cell phenotype was confirmed by immunostaining with calponin antibody (24), as shown in Figure 1.
CFTR expression was assessed in airway tissue and cultured non-CF ASM cells by immunostaining using a monoclonal antibody against the CFTR carboxyl terminus. Figure 2A is a tissue section from a lobar bronchus of a subject without CF. Double immunostaining shows that CFTR (dark blue) is present in mucus glands and in the smooth muscle layer (stained red). Figure 2B shows diffuse expression of CFTR throughout the cytoplasm of cultured non-CF ASM cells.
Effects of Histamine on Intracellular Ca2+ Release The effect of a contractile agonist, histamine, on Ca2+ release was measured in cells isolated from both subjects with and without CF. As shown in Figure 3A and 3B, exposure to 10–4 M histamine induced the release of Ca2+ in both CF and non-CF cells, but the peak release was lower in CF ASM cells compared with non-CF cells (357 ± 53 nM [n = 56 cells, 7 slides] versus 558 ± 20 nM [n = 134 cells, 16 slides] P < 0.001) (Figure 3B). Resting [Ca2+]i was slightly but significantly lower in CF than in non-CF cells (107 ± 4 nM versus 129 ± 6 nM; P = 0.001). Considering that the cultured CF smooth muscle cells had been exposed to a mixture of antibiotics for the first 48–72 hours, we conducted experiments to ascertain that this decreased response to histamine by the CF cells was not secondary to antibiotic exposure. The results show that exposure to antibiotics for 48–72 hours did not affect Ca2+ release in non-CF ASM cells. Peak [Ca2+]i response to 10–4 M histamine was 537 ± 24 nM (n = 47 cells, 6 slides) in antibiotic-exposed cells, while peak response of cells exposed to the standard growth medium was 532 ± 23 nM (n = 48 cells, 6 slides).
The role of extracellular Ca2+ was tested by measuring Ca2+ mobilization after histamine stimulation when cells were placed in Ca2+-free medium. The increase in Ca2+ was 242 ± 15 nM (n = 90 cells, 11 independent measurements) in non-CF cells versus 268 ± 45 nM (n = 58 cells, 8 independent measurements) in CF cells (Figure 3C). These results show that the difference in peak Ca2+ release in response to histamine between CF and non-CF ASM cells was abolished, and that differences are due to extracellular Ca2+ influx, probably through ion channels.
Effects of CFTR Channel Blockers on Ca2+ Release
Effects of Inhibiting CFTR Protein Expression Using Antisense–ODNs To confirm that glibenclamide inhibition of the Ca2+ release induced by 10–4 M histamine was due to reduced CFTR activity, and not to other pharmacological effects of glibenclamide, histamine-induced Ca2+ release was measured in non-CF ASM cells that had been exposed for 72 hours to either vehicle, FuGENE 6, or to FuGENE 6 plus sense-ODNs or antisense-ODNs. Peak [Ca2+]i release was significantly lower in cells lacking CFTR compared with the other three groups of cells (three independent experiments for each group) (i.e., 151 ± 12 nM versus 243 ± 12 nM in vehicle-exposed cells [n = 33 and 37 cells, respectively; P < 0.001]; 249 ± 15 nM in FuGENE 6–treated cells [n = 37 cells; P < 0.001] and 204 ± 14 nM in cells exposed to sense-ODNs [n = 37 cells; P = 0.005]) (Figure 5).
In Figure 6, CFTR localization by indirect immunofluorescence shows that CFTR was clearly down-regulated in the cells treated with antisense-ODNs (Figure 6B) compared with the cells treated with sense-ODNs (Figure 6A). Figure 6C is a bright-field microscopy picture of the image shown in Figure 6B. The appropriate negative controls, in which exposure to the primary antibody were omitted, were performed and showed no nonspecific staining.
Defects in CFTR have profound effects on epithelial cell function, and abnormal airway function in CF-affected persons is usually interpreted as resulting from these effects. In this study, we demonstrate that CFTR channels are expressed in human ASM cells, and propose that defective function in this location may also have important pathophysiological consequences. Wide-field illumination was used to maximize the signal from indirect immunofluorescence staining, which, although precluding precise cellular localization, nevertheless suggests a diffuse distribution of the CFTR channels as in other nonepithelial cells, such as lymphocytes, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and rodent vascular and tracheal smooth muscle cells (14–16, 18). There are few studies of CFTR in tissues other than epithelium. Recently, activation of the CFTR channels by specific agonists in rat vascular and tracheal smooth muscle strips has been shown to induce relaxation of precontracted tissue, leading to the speculation that the relaxation is due to an inward flow of anions triggered by the opening of the CFTR channel. In turn, this inward flow promotes hyperpolarization of the cell, and counteracts the depolarization induced by the contractile agonist and the inward flow of Ca2+ ions (16). Such a mechanism could have important consequences for airway function if alterations in Ca2+ handling were indeed caused by defective CFTR and would be expected to result in enhanced smooth muscle contraction. A difference in Ca2+ regulation in response to histamine has been observed in tracheal gland cells and in nasal epithelial cells of patients with CF, but the reason for this abnormality was not explored (28). Considering that Ca2+ is an important regulator of smooth muscle constriction, and that an abnormal response to contractile agonist could contribute to the asthma diathesis observed in patients with CF, we measured the response of CF and non-CF ASM cells to the contractile agonist, histamine. CF ASM cells have a slightly lower resting [Ca2+]i, and the peak Ca2+ release in response to histamine is decreased. This decrease in peak Ca2+ response is not specific for histamine, as we also observed it in CF cells exposed to IL-8 (29) and UTP (unpublished data). A potential role for Cl– channels, although not specifically CFTR, in the regulation of [Ca2+]i in ASM cells has been recently proposed by Janssen (30), who suggests that, after agonist exposure, Ca2+ is released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, thus increasing the negative charge on the inner side of the membrane of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. This change in electrochemical gradient in turn hinders further release of Ca2+. However, the leak of Cl– from the sarcoplasmic reticulum into the cytoplasm diminishes the electronegativity, thus allowing more Ca2+ to be released. Accumulation of Cl– ions in the cytosol hinders both processes until the opening of Cl– channels on the plasmalemma allows the Cl– ions to diffuse out of the cell and permits the ongoing diffusion of Cl– from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, thereby enhancing Ca2+ release. This hypothesis is consistent with the present data, showing a decreased release of Ca2+ in response to agonist in CF smooth muscle cells. To determine if such a mechanism could operate in ASM cells, we first determined whether the difference in Ca2+ release in response to histamine was dependent on membrane channels by measuring the histamine-induced Ca2+ release in Ca2+-free extracellular medium. The results show that the difference between CF and non-CF ASM cells was abolished, thus indicating that it is attributable to ion exchange between the cells and the extracellular medium. The possible role of the CFTR channel was then assessed by using the standard CFTR pharmacological blocker, glibenclamide, at a concentration shown to effectively block Cl– channels (30). Exposure to glibenclamide slightly increased the resting [Ca2+]i, an increase possibly attributable to the fact that glibenclamide is also a blocker of KATP channels. Indeed, blocking the K channels could result in cell depolarization and the subsequent entry of extracellular Ca2+. Exposure to glibenclamide and to DPC, another Cl– channel blocker, decreased the peak release of Ca2+ in response to histamine, which strongly suggests that the CFTR channels are involved in the regulation of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through changes in electrochemical gradient. Although the precise location of intracellular CFTR channels was not determined in our cultured ASM cells, it has been reported that functional CFTR channels are present in the endoplasmic reticulum (31), and Hirota and colleagues (32) recently showed that Cl– channels are present on tracheal smooth muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. Also, Vandebrouck and colleagues (18) have demonstrated that the CFTR channel is functional in rat tracheal smooth muscle, although the diffuse pattern of CFTR immunostaining in rat tracheal smooth muscle did not indicate CFTR localization to the plasma membrane. To confirm that these effects of the pharmacological blockers on Ca2+ release are directly attributable to the inhibition of the CFTR channels, and not to other potential pharmacological effects of the drugs, we selectively inhibited CFTR protein expression by transfecting the cells with antisense oligonucleotides. The results show that Ca2+ release was lower in the cells transfected with antisense ODN compared with those treated with control sense-ODN, or with the transfection agent FuGENE 6, thus confirming that the CFTR channel is implicated in intracellular Ca2+ regulation. Considering that Ca2+ is one of the major determinants of smooth muscle contraction, these data suggest that the modulation of contraction is affected in CF smooth muscle cells. The role of various ion channels, including Cl– channels, has been investigated in various types of smooth muscle cells, and it is now widely acknowledged that the membrane potential of vascular smooth muscle cells is determined by the flow of ions through the various channels present on the plasma membrane. In ASM cells, on the other hand, the role of ion channels in modulating contraction and relaxation is not as clear, as both contraction and relaxation can be elicited in the presence of various ion channel blockers. Fortner and colleagues (33) report that the epithelium-dependent relaxation of precontracted murine trachea by substance P or ATP is inhibited by the Cl– channel inhibitor, DPC, suggesting that the CFTR channel may be involved; however, the relative importance of the epithelial versus smooth muscle CFTR channels in mediating the relaxation was not determined. Also, ATP- and SP-induced tracheal relaxation are enhanced when Cl– secretion by epithelial cells is increased, confirming a role for Cl– ions in the relaxation. Very recently, Hirota and colleagues (32) have shown that Cl– channel blockers inhibit peak ASM contraction. They attribute this decrease in contraction to the presence of Cl– channels on the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which neutralize charge accumulation, and thus modulate Ca2+ release and uptake, as discussed above. These observations were corroborated by Alapati and colleagues (34), who observed that the contraction of bovine arteries was decreased in Cl–-free medium. These observations are consistent with our data showing a decrease in peak [Ca2+]i release in response to contractile agonists. They are, however, difficult to reconcile with reports that CFTR activation promotes smooth muscle relaxation of rat tracheal and vascular smooth muscle. However, the experimental conditions are different. In the first case, the inhibition of the Cl– channel inhibits the development of peak contraction, presumably through interference with Ca2+ release. In the second case, the authors show the effect of CFTR stimulation once contraction has been fully established. In this latter case, the influx of anions would promote hyperpolarization of the cell, and counteract the depolarization induced by the contractile agonist. In humans, the importance of CFTR regulation of smooth muscle contractility is not known. However, many of the clinical manifestations of CF that are attributed to abnormalities in mucus secretion and clearance, such as bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness, gastric dysmotility, and intestinal obstruction, could be due, at least in part, to smooth muscle dysfunction. Indeed, the fact that ASM cells of patients with CF are hypercontractile to IL-8 (35), coupled to the fact that CFTR activation induces relaxation, lends credence to this hypothesis. In conclusion, our data show that the CFTR channel is expressed and functional in human ASM cells, and is involved in intracellular Ca2+ regulation in response to a contractile agonist. We also demonstrate that intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis is affected in CF ASM cells. The importance of these observations in relation to the various clinical problems described in patients with CF remains to be determined.
This work was supported by the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and a McGill University Health Center Research Institute fellowship (R.R.). Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0444OC on August 28, 2008 Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. Received in original form December 1, 2006 Accepted in final form June 27, 2008
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||