help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on August 23, 2007, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2007-0045OC

Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., Volume 38, Number 2, February 2008, 227-238

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0045OCv1
38/2/227    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. M
Right arrow Articles by Kubes, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M. M
Right arrow Articles by Kubes, P.

Submitted on February 13, 2007
Revised on August 23, 2007

The Lung Responds to Zymosan in a Unique Manner Independent of TLRs, Complement and Dectin-1

Margaret M Kelly1, Kelly McNagny2, David L Williams3, Nico van Rooijen4, Lori Maxwell5, Carol Gwozd5, Christopher H Mody6, and Paul Kubes5*

1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2 Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 3 Departments of Surgery and Pharmacology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA, 4 Department of Cell Biology and Immunology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 5 Department of Physiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 6 Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pkubes{at}ucalgary.ca.

Background: In vitro studies indicate that the inflammatory response to zymosan, a fungal wall preparation, is dependent on toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, and that this response is enhanced by the dectin-1 receptor. Complement may also play an important role in this inflammatory response. However, the relevance of these molecules within the in vivo pulmonary environment remains unknown. Objective: To examine pulmonary in vivo inflammatory responses of the lung to zymosan. Methods: Zymosan was administered by intratracheal aerosolization to C57BL/6, TLR2-, TLR4-, MyD88- and complement-deficient mice. Outcomes included bronchoalveolar fluid cell counts. We next examined effects of dectin-1 inhibition on response to zymosan in alveolar macrophages in vitro and in lungs of C57BL/6, TLR2 and complement-deficient mice. Finally, the effect of alveolar macrophage depletion on in vivo pulmonary responses was assessed. Results: Marked zymosan-induced neutrophil responses were unaltered in TLR2-deficient mice despite a TLR2-dependent response seen with synthetic TLR2 agonists. TLR4, MyD88 and complement activation were not required for the inflammatory response to zymosan. Although dectin-1 receptor inhibition blocked the inflammatory response of alveolar macrophages to zymosan in vitro, in vivo pulmonary leukocyte recruitment was not altered even in the absence of toll-like receptor 2 or complement. Depletion of alveolar macrophages did not affect the response to zymosan. Conclusion: Neither complement, macrophages nor TLR2, TLR4, MyD88 and/or dectin-1 receptors were involved in the pulmonary in vivo inflammatory response to zymosan.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society.